Revised 2020 Fixture

[Sir Why You Little 36,638]

58 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

They've clearly caved into Dangerfield who wants less games, shorter quarters and more money.

Less supporters if they are not very careful....

[Dr. Gonzo 23,708]

49 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Yes i am sure they do. But a 3 hour time segment can be just as lucrative 

That is just lazy. I know how advertising schedules work. 
if they employed better commentators, for a start, that would vibe up the hours instantly 

People turn off because the Commentary is so bad. I do the same with the Cricket ? now. Unwatchable so often,  because of James Brayshaw style of Commentary where they pump themselves up bigger than the game!!

2x 2hr games is better than 2x 3hr games - it would allow them to have all games over the weekend with no overlapping. Would also mean games on Thurs/Mon nights are more lucrative as they will finish earlier on tv

[Sir Why You Little 36,638]

31 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

2x 2hr games is better than 2x 3hr games - it would allow them to have all games over the weekend with no overlapping. Would also mean games on Thurs/Mon nights are more lucrative as they will finish earlier on tv

Yes i know. Just like 20/20 Cricket

Less of a game always....

[dworship 3,342]

5 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Exactly. These Cowboys have to go

Eddie should have been banished after the Adam Goodes imbroglio 

For him to still be a Media Spokeman is disgraceful 

Stop it, you're making my head hurt.

[dworship 3,342]

5 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Exactly. 
What are the alteria motives 

Hocking justifying his position?

The game is 100 minnues +- Time on

That's much better, but why are you interested in a Pokemon's motives?

Ok I agree with you, the game time shouldn't be changed or tinkered with. From what I see the Corvid stuff was just an excuse. So the turnaround and fixture issues may have caused player fatigue. Well it's going to be a shorter season now so adapt and overcome. Potentially we might have seen some fringe players given more time or some given a debut. I'm sick of the AFL and it's meddling with the rules so they can "improve the game"  Contest can come in many forms and I like the idea that a fitter team can get on top of a more skillful team as fatigue sets in. Often that's how tight finishes come about.

Oh wait, that was one of our big improvements over summer. I've often wondered how the WC game might have ended with an EXTRA 20 MINS. Curse you Red Fox!!

[Coq au vin 755]

Let’s have five a side, 20 on the bench, 10 minute quarters, 30 minute breaks for advertising betting and fattening take away foods, no access on free to air tv, so much noise each break due to advertising and general nonsense that the coaches can’t be heard, excessive running training so that all players have stress fractures in their feet, a ban on any fun at all for players: no sex, no alcohol for fifty million years, no jokes, No going out at night ever. Also no contact at all ever. That’s what the AFL wants. Let’s give it to them. Oh and five games a year maximum.

No fans will attend.

Then we can all go and watch the soccer or rugby league and forget this RUINED game.

Edited May 26, 2020 by President Dee Trump

[58er 5,957]

On 5/25/2020 at 2:25 PM, Diamond_Jim said:

will definitely answer a lot of questions.

Going into 2019 we would pencil all those games in as wins. No excuses especially with Geelong at the MCG.

Of course we have got such an easy draw because we are not worthy of a marquee game. (every game a twilight game !!)

Let's hope we start well as we could with luck see some real prime timespots against big opposition if we were to win the first four.

Sunday's are considered afternoon not twilight and Are  FTAir. 
Yes Thurs and Frid are best but we have got only 4 or 5 more away games in 12 and 2 already interstate trips. Maybe at best 2,more with Alice Springs  still included I think.
Actually we don't play bad at most venues so if we miss GWS away and of course no Geelong it's not a bad draw even if we played in Hobart.

Time to get real and raise the bar as in 2018.

[MyFavouriteMartian 572]

7 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

That is the justification spin. I know all that. I want to know the real rationale of this

There is no need to shorten Quarters...

If they do, for 2020;  I do not want it to continue into coming seasons.  They've stuffed the game enough.

I'd like to see the rules taken back to 1990 rules,  as they were then,  and reset.

 

Now some are saying that ruckmen are in for it.

 

Give the running of the game back to the people.   We are the buyers of the games,  and we know what we like. 

We are the customers, and guess what,  the customer is always right on.

[Mazer Rackham 14,971]

41 minutes ago, President Dee Trump said:

Let’s have five a side, 20 on the bench, 10 minute quarters, 30 minute breaks for advertising betting and fattening take away foods, no access on free to air tv, so much noise each break due to advertising and general nonsense that the coaches can’t be heard, excessive running training so that all players have stress fractures in their feet, a ban on any fun at all for players: no sex, no alcohol for fifty million years, no jokes, No going out at night ever. Also no contact at all ever. That’s what the AFL wants. Let’s give it to them. Oh and five games a year maximum.

No fans will attend.

Who needs fans. Simulate them with computers.

In fact, simulate entire games. Who needs players? Run the whole thing on computers. You could do the whole season in advance, one weekend in January, then dole out the results over 23 weeks. No injuries to real people, no players association, no players getting on the turps or worse. So profitable! I mean, so ... entertaining.

[MyFavouriteMartian 572]

8 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

Run the whole thing on computers

'e' footy_    whodafunk.

[Pates 9,625]

On the fixture, there is absolutely no excuses for us. 3 of them very winnable (would go so far to say should win), one of them we will be definite underdogs but it's at the MCG which helps us.

If last year was the odd one out, then we should be winning 3 out of 4 at least.

[Pates 9,625]

On 5/25/2020 at 4:14 AM, Gunna’s said:

No prime time

not surprised though

One advantage the AFL has going with the "make it up as you go" fixture is they might be able to be more flexible with how they create the draw through the year. If a team starts to show some excitement and entertainment they could be bumped into higher exposure timeslots. This should 100% be an aim for us to be pushing into the minds of Seven and the AFL to get us into those prime time slots by the end of the year.

[58er 5,957]

On 5/25/2020 at 1:24 PM, buck_nekkid said:

Glad there are no crowds allowed.  We play in the Sunday arvo death slot 3 times, but it is made for tv!

BN why is that's the death slit that's the late Sunday  GameStop 6pm!

[58er 5,957]

On 5/25/2020 at 1:14 PM, Gunna’s said:

No prime time

not surprised though

Any F to Air is considered prime time ie 3.30pm in Sunday is a good time better than 1 pm or 6pm 

[Demonland 70,271]

[Dr. Gonzo 23,708]

31 minutes ago, Demonland said:

It says we're the biggest loser but then goes on to say Freo & Sydney had easier ranked draws initially so it's a rubbish article.

Also the only reason we're the "biggest loser" is based on our double-ups in the initial draw which are not going ahead.

I'd say escaping a trip to Geelong is a tick for the win column.

[La Dee-vina Comedia 16,645]

32 minutes ago, Demonland said:

I think Cal Twomey needs to think this through a bit better. The logic of his article is that Melbourne is the biggest loser from the draw because we had the 3rd easiest fixture according to Champion Data's analysis. Now that every team plays each other team just once, the advantage of who you play twice is lost. Surely, however, if he wants to accept the Champion Data analysis (itself arguable), the team with the easiest draw (Fremantle) is the biggest loser. 

[La Dee-vina Comedia 16,645]

4 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

It says we're the biggest loser but then goes on to say Freo & Sydney had easier ranked draws initially so it's a rubbish article.

Also the only reason we're the "biggest loser" is based on our double-ups in the initial draw which are not going ahead.

I'd say escaping a trip to Geelong is a tick for the win column.

Snap.

I'd also argue that St Kilda with no free-to-air games in the first batch of 4 rounds is the biggest loser.

 

[old55 22,793]

18 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

The game is 100 minnues +- Time on

It was in 1964 at least - where you are stuck.

[Coq au vin 755]

Each quarter is 20 minutes plus time on. Until the AFL makes each quarter 17 minutes or 5 minutes or whatever!

[binman 41,964]

I sort of see what twomey is getting at but really he is talking about a parallel universe where covid don't happen. What's the point of thinking about that?

You might as well say wc and Freo are the losers because they lose their considerable home ground advantage.

Where we are unlucky is having to play west coast in round one. Both in terms of the game coming straight after the announcement the season was on hold and having that game in Perth. It's possible, but probably unlikely, that no other teams will have to play there.

But personally I love the fact we only play each team once. It is how each season should be (with an expanded finals series of some sort). The finalists will all deserve their spot this year

[Bring-Back-Powell 14,364]

1 hour ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

I'd say escaping a trip to Geelong is a tick for the win column.

100% agree.

Turns a near certain loss into a possibility.

Probably be the one year we escape a trip to Geelong seeing as though the marquee teams will be playing there as a once off.

[Six6Six 1,507]

3 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

I'd say escaping a trip to Geelong is a tick for the win column.

I wouldn't talk to soon with regard to that. The AFL are just as likely to fixture games not involving Geelong at GMBH stadium to ease the load on the MCG and Marvel. I know who one of their preferred candidates would be.

[Demonland 70,271]

22 minutes ago, Six6Six said:

I wouldn't talk to soon with regard to that. The AFL are just as likely to fixture games not involving Geelong at GMBH stadium to ease the load on the MCG and Marvel. I know who one of their preferred candidates would be.

Without getting too far ahead of myself we could end up playing there in October (perhaps with some type of home crowd).

[buck_nekkid 5,818]

8 hours ago, 58er said:

BN why is that's the death slit that's the late Sunday  GameStop 6pm!

I think I knew her at uni...

Yep, death slot for crowds, but a boon for us in tv.  And we will be 4:1 away games, so if crowds come back, we may get better revenues from attendances than others