Jump to content

Featured Replies

16 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

So apparently it was mentioned on SEN this afternoon and then later on channel 7 that we are making a late play for Bruce?

Did anyone catch this??

Was it from the hosts or did someone call in?

 
11 minutes ago, AaronDaveyChipsAndGravey said:

I thought he’d agreed to the Dogs on personal terms, was just a matter of the clubs putting a suitable trade together. Unless we pull a Sydney-Lockett style rug pulling why would he have reason to change his mind. Dogs would surely have more $$ than us to offer

The suitable trade hasn’t been found. 

Both parties have valued his worth differently at this point  

 

1 minute ago, Sir Why You Little said:

The suitable trade hasn’t been found. 

Both parties have valued his worth differently at this point  

 

And it's always good to up his value and make sure the Dogs pay top price ???

 

Really rate him and would be happy to pass the Elliot contract over to him.

 

Next year’s second round pick..?

How old is he?


9 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

The suitable trade hasn’t been found. 

Both parties have valued his worth differently at this point  

 

I cant see us offering much better. Unless we offer this years or next years 2nd (one of which is going for Langdon) then I don’t see him going to us

Edited by AaronDaveyChipsAndGravey

4 minutes ago, DeeZee said:

How old is he?

27

 

 

 

 
43 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

So apparently it was mentioned on SEN this afternoon and then later on channel 7 that we are making a late play for Bruce?

Did anyone catch this??

Yes i heard this on the trade game, don't mind it at all, they'd be after our 2nd rounder isn't that pick 21?

 If everything else fell into place with salary/ contract yrs etc.

Would represent a good bit of business.

Saints clearing the decks for Ben King to come on board next year.

Edited by Win4theAges

Just now, Win4theAges said:

Yes i heard this on the trade game, don't mind it at all, they'd be after our 2nd rounder isn't that pick 21?

 If everything else fell into place with salary/ contract yrs etc.

That’d be going to Fremantle for Langdon I’d say.

Perhaps on trading the Frost pick..?  I have no idea what that might be, but Frost for Bruce sounds close to the mark.


1 minute ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

That’d be going to Fremantle for Langdon I’d say.

Perhaps on trading the Frost pick..?  I have no idea what that might be, but Frost for Bruce sounds close to the mark.

Even better?

If we really are into him I hope we get him, not because I rate him but if we miss out we’re going to start looking like Norf soon. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

1 minute ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

If we really are into him I hope we get him, not because I rate him but if we miss out we’re going to start looking like Norf soon. 

Is his middle name Basil? 

10 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Frost for Bruce sounds close to the mark.

My first thought was no way (Bruce more valuable than Frost) but then I checked this year's B & F results - they both finished 9th!


28 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

And it's always good to up his value and make sure the Dogs pay top price ???

Yes, except they have no intention of doing so

Greetings 3rd Party.... 

5 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

If we really are into him I hope we get him, not because I rate him but if we miss out we’re going to start looking like Norf soon. 

Tomlinson and Langdon say HI!

My issue is everyone is saying saints need to clear space to get king. If we grab him we have no room for king (salary cap wise). So if we want king it's a no, if they want a second round pick (one to Freo and one to saints to me is a no as well as the draft is so even this year especially). But the club will do whatever it wants.

2 minutes ago, Wunders said:

My issue is everyone is saying saints need to clear space to get king. If we grab him we have no room for king (salary cap wise). So if we want king it's a no, if they want a second round pick (one to Freo and one to saints to me is a no as well as the draft is so even this year especially). But the club will do whatever it wants.

I think the Saints need to take care of this year's shopping list before they look to King.

They need picks and cash to cover Hill, Jones, Ryder, etc.

Something's gotta give.

4 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I think the Saints need to take care of this year's shopping list before they look to King.

They need picks and cash to cover Hill, Jones, Ryder, etc.

Something's gotta give.

Hill for 6  is easy but then Howard, Jones, Ryder and Butler maybe, when their next pick is 59.

I suppose the picks for Bruce and Steven could get Jones and Howard and Ryder could be 59 and Butler could be a 2020 pick.

They have cap room and lose Bruce/Newnes/Steven and others to make more room.


33 minutes ago, AaronDaveyChipsAndGravey said:

I cant see us offering much better. Unless we offer this years or next years 2nd (one of which is going for Langdon) then I don’t see him going to us

It depends how far apart the negotiations are. The Aints need some good numbers to help get all their other deals done. 

The Dogs know it

We should be waiting, just off to the side..

  • Author

More than happy to add Bruce to the forward line, can take a grab, average set shot. it'll be like Hogan is back

 
1 hour ago, Wiseblood said:

Is his middle name Basil? 

Not his middle name, however..

In the 1939 Sherlock Homes movie, Holmes and Watson were played by Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce respectively. This is how he got the nickname.....Basil. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

2 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

In the 1939 Sherlock Homes movie, Holmes and Watson were played by Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce respectively. This is how he got the nickname of Basil. 

It’s pretty well documented that the players’ collective-favourite author is Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, so that checks out. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 88 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 320 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies