Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Saints are gunna get shafted here and cough up pick 5 for him.

5 hours ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Saints are gunna get shafted here and cough up pick 5 for him.

Given the length and amount of the contract, Saints certainly think he’s worth pick 5. They’re shafting themselves. 

 

Saints are at Norf level desperate to get anyone to sign with them.

2 hours ago, Clintosaurus said:

Saints are at Norf level desperate to get anyone to sign with them.

Agreed. Sure Hill is a good player, but he is nowhere near $900K good.

That kind of money is more for A-grade, heading into A+ category player's. Hill is a solid B+ at best.


As we well know, when you've been down the bottom for a while, you do have to overpay in order to lure good players. You'd think it'd be heavily front-ended.

8 hours ago, Clintosaurus said:

Saints are at Norf level desperate to get anyone to sign with them.

Not sure I get that logic, I’d rather Hill than at least 3/4 of our list. 

1 hour ago, Cards13 said:

Not sure I get that logic, I’d rather Hill than at least 3/4 of our list. 

Not for $900k a season.

 
On 9/13/2019 at 11:16 AM, Nelo said:

Nominated Saints as preferred club. 6 year deal worth 5.4 mil and freo want their pick 5. I know he’s a good player but gee that’s seems like a lot. 

Yep, feels like overs.

By about 350%.

 

19 hours ago, A F said:

As we well know, when you've been down the bottom for a while, you do have to overpay in order to lure good players. You'd think it'd be heavily front-ended.

Or you just draft well ... (I.e Carlton)


3 hours ago, Alex Flood said:

Or you just draft well ... (I.e Carlton)

Carlton have had just as many misses, if not more, than us over the years.

  • 4 weeks later...

imagine being fremantle and thinking Brad Hill is worth a top 5 pick and another first rounder but being absolutely certain Jesse Hogan isn't. 

He's barely worth pick 6 let alone another first rounder. Keep dreaming Bell

St Kilda were always going to have this issue when they offered Hill $900k per season. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay


17 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Fremantle up to their old tricks. 

 

After paying pick 27 or something for him? Dreaming.

3 minutes ago, Demonland said:

They'd needed a lure to get him to nominate them so that Freo would only deal with them and now they are reaping what they sowed.

Exactly. $900k a year on a six year contract. IMO he’s not worth two first round picks however St Kilda’s offer says he is.

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

Two first rounders for Hill is way over but I suppose we paid that for Lever. 


18 minutes ago, Nelo said:

Two first rounders for Hill is way over but I suppose we paid that for Lever. 

Sure did... if you think pick 6 and pick 19 hold the same value.

 

 

26 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

After paying pick 27 or something for him? Dreaming.

What does what they paid have to do with true value? 

24 minutes ago, Nelo said:

Two first rounders for Hill is way over but I suppose we paid that for Lever. 

Pick 6 and future first (St Kilda’s, let’s say pick 8 next year) vs pick 10 and a future pick 19 (with pick 35 coming back) ......

The first round is a long round and covers everything from pick 1 to a pick in the low 20s.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Adelaide

    The atmosphere at the Melbourne Football Club at the beginning of the season was aspirational following an injury-plagued year in 2024. Coach Simon Goodwin had lofty expectations with the return of key players, the anticipated improvement from a maturing group with a few years of experience under their belts, and some exceptional young talent also joining the ranks. All of that went by the wayside as the team failed to click into action early on. It rallied briefly with a new strategy but has fallen again with five more  consecutive defeats. 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Coburg

    The Casey Demons returned to their home ground which was once a graveyard for opposing teams but they managed to gift the four points on offer to Coburg with yet another of their trademark displays of inaccuracy in front of goals and some undisciplined football that earned the displeasure of the umpires late in the game. The home team was welcomed by a small crowd at Casey Fields and looked right at home as it dominated the first three quarters and led for all bar the last five minutes of the game. In the end, they came away with nothing, despite winning everywhere but on the scoreboard and the free kick count.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne

    After four weeks on the road the Demons make their long awaited return to the MCG next Sunday to play in a classic late season dead rubber against the North Melbourne Kangaroos. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 105 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demons were wasteful early before putting the foot down early in the 2nd quarter but they chased tail for the remainder of the match. They could not get their first use of the footy after half time and when they did poor skills, execution and decision making let them down.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 241 replies
  • PODCAST: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Crows.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 23 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kysaiah Pickett and Clayton Oliver. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 27 replies