Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 On 13/09/2019 at 01:47, Mach5 said: No chance. GC aren’t looking for a win-win. They’re looking to make a statement, that players won’t be allowed to just leave each year, even if it means cutting off their nose to spite their face. Similar to Port with nick stevens. Expand you're probably right, i just think it's foolish on their part. Quote
Mach5 4,768 Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 On 13/09/2019 at 01:49, Patches O’houlihan said: you're probably right, i just think it's foolish on their part. Expand Yes and no. Gotta make a stand at some point. Otherwise install a revolving door. 1 Quote
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 On 13/09/2019 at 01:59, Mach5 said: Yes and no. Gotta make a stand at some point. Otherwise install a revolving door. Expand I think they'd be much better off addressing the problems they have before they make a stand. King imo is going to leave this year, or next year, and with pick 3 on the table they might as well get max value and hope the off field changes enable them to keep their top 3 picks 1 Quote
Moonshadow 17,678 Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 On 13/09/2019 at 02:02, Patches O’houlihan said: I think they'd be much better off addressing the problems they have before they make a stand. King imo is going to leave this year, or next year, and with pick 3 on the table they might as well get max value and hope the off field changes enable them to keep their top 3 picks Expand What if, by chance, GCS don't get picks 1 & 2. Would you trade 2 for King? Anderson and Rowell are tantalising. Quote
Demon Disciple 12,538 Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 On 13/09/2019 at 06:44, Moonshadow said: What if, by chance, GCS don't get picks 1 & 2. Expand I guess we'll cross that bridge if we come to it. Quote
spirit of norm smith 16,679 Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 Unlikely bridge. Afl are soft when it comes to their two “children” (Giants and Suns). Quote
Moonshadow 17,678 Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 On 13/09/2019 at 07:11, Demon Disciple said: I guess we'll cross that bridge if we come to it. Expand Ok then, so we can't speculate on a footy forum? Righto. Quote
Bombay Airconditioning 6,510 Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 On 13/09/2019 at 06:44, Moonshadow said: What if, by chance, GCS don't get picks 1 & 2. Would you trade 2 for King? Anderson and Rowell are tantalising. Expand How good is King? We still need midfield class if we are serious about competing. I understand scoring was an issue this year but I believe that can be addressed easier than our midfield problems. 1 Quote
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 On 13/09/2019 at 06:44, Moonshadow said: What if, by chance, GCS don't get picks 1 & 2. Would you trade 2 for King? Anderson and Rowell are tantalising. Expand I'd still take King over Anderson, just, gotta go with the key forward. Quote
TRIGON 4,821 Posted September 13, 2019 Posted September 13, 2019 (edited) Fantasy trade/draft pick wish list V2, if Laird is not on the trade table. If P2: draft Anderson, Langdon (trading 2nd round), Tomlinson, Elliot: If P3: split picks, draft Stephens and Weightman, the rest as above. Edited September 13, 2019 by TRIGON Quote
samcantstandya 1,081 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 13/09/2019 at 22:11, TRIGON said: Fantasy trade/draft pick wish list V2, if Laird is not on the trade table. If P2: draft Anderson, Langdon (trading 2nd round), Tomlinson, Elliot: If P3: split picks, draft Stephens and Weightman, the rest as above. Expand Either option has its positives. 1 Quote
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 Just saw on the news that we've shown interest in Weightman as high as 2/3 potentially so if the club realistically thinks he might be there at pick 11 i think we'll do the split. because they'd get a bloke they wanted and another free hit at the draft, plus probably something else from the Giants as well. Quote
whatwhat say what 23,875 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 14/09/2019 at 02:36, Patches O’houlihan said: Just saw on the news that we've shown interest in Weightman as high as 2/3 potentially so if the club realistically thinks he might be there at pick 11 i think we'll do the split. because they'd get a bloke they wanted and another free hit at the draft, plus probably something else from the Giants as well. Expand i think that's the real key the split pick could end up being worth pick 12 and pick 18 - all tbd at this point Quote
Ithinkimgawnalever 90 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 08/09/2019 at 15:02, FlashInThePan said: Here’s how I think this is going down. GC will get the priority pick and 2 becomes 3, not ideal but they probably need all the help they can get just now. Anderson is out of reach and so we do the following: Langdon for pick 21 Tomlinson as FA option 1 (left field): We get Jamie Elliot as FA and we take pick 3 to the draft for Young option 2: We trade 3 to GWS for 12 and 15 and go for players like Ash and Cody Weightman. Expand Why trade 3 for 12 and 15? Quote
Demon Disciple 12,538 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 14/09/2019 at 05:08, Ithinkimgawnalever said: Why trade 3 for 12 and 15? Expand Agree, if it's for picks, there's gonna need to be more than 12 & 15 coming back. 1 Quote
spirit of norm smith 16,679 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 14/09/2019 at 05:19, Demon Disciple said: Agree, if it's for picks, there's gonna need to be more than 12 & 15 coming back. Expand Agree. That’s not the greatest deal. Giants would jump at that. Quote
Redleg 42,181 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 14/09/2019 at 05:35, spirit of norm smith said: Agree. That’s not the greatest deal. Giants would jump at that. Expand That's why the suggestion of Tomlinson's GWS compo pick is also thrown in the mix, meaning you get FA Tomlinson, picks 12 and 14 and Langdon for the compo pick. To me that is a good deal. Quote
Red and Blue realist 2,063 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 14/09/2019 at 06:00, Redleg said: That's why the suggestion of Tomlinson's GWS compo pick is also thrown in the mix, meaning you get FA Tomlinson, picks 12 and 14 and Langdon for the compo pick. To me that is a good deal. Expand More likely to be a player than the compo pick, GWS will need points for their academy kid who'll get an early bid. 3 for 13, 15 (of they lose tonight) and one of their young kids before they need a bigger contact extension over the next few years. 1 Quote
Redleg 42,181 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 14/09/2019 at 06:35, Red and Blue realist said: More likely to be a player than the compo pick, GWS will need points for their academy kid who'll get an early bid. 3 for 13, 15 (of they lose tonight) and one of their young kids before they need a bigger contact extension over the next few years. Expand I would be happy with Tomlinson FA, 12, Langdon for the Tomlinson compo pick and a player from GWS, say Caldwell. 1 1 Quote
Mach5 4,768 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 14/09/2019 at 06:46, Redleg said: I would be happy with Tomlinson FA, 12, Langdon for the Tomlinson compo pick and a player from GWS, say Caldwell. Expand That’d be a great result. Quote
dazzledavey36 56,348 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 14/09/2019 at 06:46, Redleg said: I would be happy with Tomlinson FA, 12, Langdon for the Tomlinson compo pick and a player from GWS, say Caldwell. Expand I'd love Caldwell too, but he is very highly rated at the Giants and I just cannot see them trading him away after 1 year. 1 Quote
Redleg 42,181 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 14/09/2019 at 07:01, dazzledavey36 said: I'd love Caldwell too, but he is very highly rated at the Giants and I just cannot see them trading him away after 1 year. Expand I suppose it depends on how much they want 2/3. 1 Quote
Dees247 140 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 (edited) On 14/09/2019 at 02:36, Patches O’houlihan said: Just saw on the news that we've shown interest in Weightman as high as 2/3 potentially so if the club realistically thinks he might be there at pick 11 i think we'll do the split. because they'd get a bloke they wanted and another free hit at the draft, plus probably something else from the Giants as well. Expand Which news (what channel)? I’d like to watch it! Edited September 14, 2019 by Dees247 Quote
Lord Travis 10,819 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 14/09/2019 at 06:46, Redleg said: I would be happy with Tomlinson FA, 12, Langdon for the Tomlinson compo pick and a player from GWS, say Caldwell. Expand All could realistically happen except for the Caldwell part. He was pick 11 a year ago, and wouldn’t be part of any deal unless we added another first rounder. He looks like he could become a gun midfielder and I’d gladly give a first rounder for him if he was up for a move. Someone like Bonar might be a more realistic option to get added to the pick split trade if it happens. Quote
whatwhat say what 23,875 Posted September 14, 2019 Posted September 14, 2019 On 14/09/2019 at 07:42, Lord Travis said: All could realistically happen except for the Caldwell part. He was pick 11 a year ago, and wouldn’t be part of any deal unless we added another first rounder. He looks like he could become a gun midfielder and I’d gladly give a first rounder for him if he was up for a move. Someone like Bonar might be a more realistic option to get added to the pick split trade if it happens. Expand i'm very keen on bonar big body and great burst speed Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.