Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

How come Essendon gets to play on every so called significant 'day' on the calendar ? 

 

Because.........um.......oh, theyre so insignificant they need some help?

They only get Anzac Day with Pies

We get Anzac Eve with Tiges

we get QB with Pies

Hawks get Easter Monday with Cats

Tiges get R1 with Carlton 

Recently GF has been Roos v Dogs  Roos pushed for GF for years “RCH game”

trying to justify/tie it to RCH.  North and Footscray were two suburbs nearby the hospital  

for some reason this year, Dogs (don’t think they were seen as good enough for potential showcase game) replaced by Essendon - logical replacement given proximity of RCH to both clubs.

 

Several fans could ask why we get QB ( birthed from 50s folk lore)

 

 

 

Because they have the third or fourth biggest following and Collingwood cannot be everywhere.

We had three prime time evening slots in a row and stank on two of them.

Guess who the public want to see.

Why did both Collingwood and Essendon get 7 and 6 day breaks respectively for ANZAC day and us and Richmond only get 4 day breaks. We should have been given Thursday/Friday games. 


Actually most significant days are September. So long as we are there and not Essendon. 

Just now, Diamond_Jim said:

Why don't Essendon play in Darwin ???

.....permanently.

 
9 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Darwin Bombers?

may not go down well in some circles.

As an aside it was amazing how the story of Darwin was a classified war secret for so long.


1 hour ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Why don't Essendon play in Darwin ???

Baghdad.

1 hour ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Darwin Bombers?

Baghdad Bombers,  flying high on injected Nitrous

57 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

may not go down well in some circles.

As an aside it was amazing how the story of Darwin was a classified war secret for so long.

 

1 hour ago, radar said:

They only get Anzac Day with Pies

We get Anzac Eve with Tiges

we get QB with Pies

Hawks get Easter Monday with Cats

Tiges get R1 with Carlton 

Recently GF has been Roos v Dogs  Roos pushed for GF for years “RCH game”

trying to justify/tie it to RCH.  North and Footscray were two suburbs nearby the hospital  

for some reason this year, Dogs (don’t think they were seen as good enough for potential showcase game) replaced by Essendon - logical replacement given proximity of RCH to both clubs.

 

Several fans could ask why we get QB ( birthed from 50s folk lore)

 

 

You forget the Dream Time Game against Richmond & The Farm Game against Jeelong

Essendrug have a dream run considering the past few years

bastards should have spent 10 years in the amateur league as far as i am concerned

Essendrug have lost their time-honoured mojo. The AFL is attempting to bring it back after recent years of public disgrace. No stone will be left unturned. Hark, the herald angels (fans) sing (complain). Returning silence is appeased and compensated by payments from the AFL. This will assist the Bummers to meet their pharmacology costs, nudge, nudge ... wink, wink. In the meantime, nothing is happening and it is their time to sip freely from the pig's trough. 

The trouble with these dedicated slots is that they distort the draw generally and can lead to poor matches depending on how the 2 teams are travelling at the time - there may be much better matched teams to play in the slot and often this will be predictable by the end of the preceding year. (Of course this is not foolproof, but has to have a higher probability of getting it right than just playing the same 2 teams every year). 

It is hard enough to arrange a draw without these extra constraints (no matter whether the criteria for the draw is be nice to big clubs or one of the other many aims the AFL or supporters may have).   While it may be fairer to the clubs which are not already getting these 'featured annual' slots, if the AFL keep on adding more of these annual events it will all get even harder. 

To produce a better overall draw over the entire season, maybe it would be better to drop the lot of them - even from a commercial point of view.  Won't happen though.

Same reason as why Collingwood hasn't played at Geelong for 20 years and we seem to get that honour every season - it isn't a level playing field 


6 minutes ago, Sydee said:

Same reason as why Collingwood hasn't played at Geelong for 20 years and we seem to get that honour every season - it isn't a level playing field 

Essendon,Collingwood,Richmond, (usually) are spared the handicap of playing at Geelong,the venue that Victorian taxpayers funded, but only Geelong members can fit in.

30 minutes ago, sue said:

The trouble with these dedicated slots is that they distort the draw generally and can lead to poor matches depending on how the 2 teams are travelling at the time - there may be much better matched teams to play in the slot and often this will be predictable by the end of the preceding year. (Of course this is not foolproof, but has to have a higher probability of getting it right than just playing the same 2 teams every year). 

It is hard enough to arrange a draw without these extra constraints (no matter whether the criteria for the draw is be nice to big clubs or one of the other many aims the AFL or supporters may have).   While it may be fairer to the clubs which are not already getting these 'featured annual' slots, if the AFL keep on adding more of these annual events it will all get even harder. 

To produce a better overall draw over the entire season, maybe it would be better to drop the lot of them - even from a commercial point of view.  Won't happen though.

Why don't all the prime slot Games get put into a hat before the start of the season, and before the draw is done and every club gets their name put into the hat, and a draw takes place. Then the rest of the draw for the season is built around who, and who doesn't have their name drawn out. This is called fairness. I realize that  this would be a possible loss of revenue, but surely it could be made up by a small deduction in Salary.......

1 minute ago, willmoy said:

Why don't all the prime slot Games get put into a hat before the start of the season, and before the draw is done and every club gets their name put into the hat, and a draw takes place. Then the rest of the draw for the season is built around who, and who doesn't have their name drawn out. This is called fairness. I realize that  this would be a possible loss of revenue, but surely it could be made up by a small deduction in Salary.......

Are you serious?

A Blockbuster game is that because people want it and watch it

it also makes the Broadcasters a lot of revenue

Good Friday is a strange one, Nought Melbourne are such a sterile entity, if not persistant

7 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Are you serious?

A Blockbuster game is that because people want it and watch it

it also makes the Broadcasters a lot of revenue

Good Friday is a strange one, Nought Melbourne are such a sterile entity, if not persistant

Isn't the mere malaise of "winning at all costs" bad enough.


44 minutes ago, Sydee said:

Same reason as why Collingwood hasn't played at Geelong for 20 years and we seem to get that honour every season - it isn't a level playing field 

It isn't?

But isn't the AFL all about fairness, inclusiveness and equality?

1 hour ago, radar said:

I always felt the Anzac Day game should between the two highest finishing Vic teams from previous season. 

 

Dont think “Birds of Tokyo” appropriate in any way shape or form

https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-australia-47796046

It will get even worse if they do a cover of OMD’s ‘Enola Gay’

1 hour ago, willmoy said:

Why don't all the prime slot Games get put into a hat before the start of the season, and before the draw is done and every club gets their name put into the hat, and a draw takes place. Then the rest of the draw for the season is built around who, and who doesn't have their name drawn out. This is called fairness. I realize that  this would be a possible loss of revenue, but surely it could be made up by a small deduction in Salary.......

Now this is why players, coaches, administrators, etc etc, should never read anything on the internet.

Imagine the anxiety and depression this irresponsible idea could induce in someone like Gil McLachlan if he saw it. It's like a living walking nightmare!

Gil: if you're reading this: the rest of us want double header blockbusters 8 times per season, Collingwood & Essendon every Friday night, and you can f*** off low drawing clubs to Darwin, Shepparton and Hobart permanently. Do this and we in turn promise to watch every match every week on TV including all ads. Chin up mate.

To Mr willmoy: sorry, your concept of "fairness" (interesting word: it apparently means "impartial and just treatment or behaviour without favouritism or discrimination" ... going to be a long night on google for me) has no place in this modern entertainment experience sporting competition.

Edited by Mazer Rackham

 
52 minutes ago, Redleg said:

It isn't?

But isn't the AFL all about fairness, inclusiveness and equality?

The AFL is all about crowds, TV ratings, sporting hegemony, women's rights, racism (anti, in case you were wondering)., LGBTQI (pro), cheaper pies and chips, indigenous rights, millenial relevance, China, social inclusivity, cancer (anti), disease (anti), drugs (anti? to be determined), diggers, peace, dignity, justice and truth. There may be a sporting competition involved but that's not as clear.

....and all of this ironically under the heading  topic of TWSNBN 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 30 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

    • 160 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

    • 546 replies
  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 287 replies