Jump to content

Featured Replies

To be fair, I think the backline being a tad underdone is going to be a relevant talking point regardless of the Essendon result. May and Lever would be in our top 10 paid players and are most certainly best 22. We are really struggling down back, and having those two fit and firing would certainly have made a difference in the early stages of the season. 

As far as Goody goes, It's a bold approach and I think it shows that he thinks the list is capable of executing his game plan effectively right now. He knows more about where the list is at than I do, so I'm expecting the team to come out swinging on Friday night.

Edited by Adzman

 

I think he is doing what any good coach would: shielding his players from any potential fallout. If we get pantsed, the focus is on him. 

We have had a shortened summer (by a month) for the first time in the careers of all the players.

They are not prepared just yet and I hope they get there soon or the season will get away from us.

But Goodwin knows, from the sporadic selection of our smalls in the forward line and back line, that we don't have trusted talent in those positions.

 

This thread is a classic from classic Demonlanders.

If Goodwin has said something about our bad pre-season, the same posters (ADC, beelzebub, SWYL) would be complaining about him making excuses.

2 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Goodwin's not under a cent of pressure. He's re-signed until end of 2022.

Yeah, because AFL coaches (and MFC coaches in particular) always make it to the end of their contract.

3 hours ago, Satyriconhome said:

It may turnaround this week, but it will require 22 working as a team, that is what has been missing last 2 weeks, no excuses any more

Agree Saty. In terms of individual players' we have been poor apart from Salem in R1 and Clarry in R2, but collectively as a team we have been abysmal.

Need total buy in from all 22 each and every week. The fact that it has not dawned on all players on our senior list highlights we still have a way to go, re: maturing.


2 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Goodwin's not under a cent of pressure. He's re-signed until end of 2022.

Why would you worry about Goodwin , as if he doesn't care ? he didn't ask for the losses or the injuries we have. 

So lay off him he is out there to do his best and we have to stick by him and the players and support them not criticise when thing don't go to plan.  We are a touch behind however we will be better and improve so hang in there support hard .............. We are Melbourne!

3 hours ago, beelzebub said:

How many are in peak fit shape ?? 

What you don't get is we believe the results... believe the vision of getting run circles around...of hands on hips, blowing hard.

The Dee's are starting the season as most teams finish it....stuffed.

 

Now you are the one making excuses, professional footy players, have to ensure they are fit, doing extras etc etc, as another poster said, you really do need something to whine about don't you

I think he wanted to say, "We all need to pull our socks up." But that would have sounded too simple. The journos would have nothing to write about. Instead they fill the sport pages with waffle. We all know about the injuries etc etc.

 
27 minutes ago, Satyriconhome said:

Now you are the one making excuses, professional footy players, have to ensure they are fit, doing extras etc etc, as another poster said, you really do need something to whine about don't you

You define gullible. You believe the club hook Line and sinker. The first language of football is lies.

I'd love Melbourne to actually be successful...not just play at it around the edges.

You're very funny Saty. Youve really got a taste for the koolaid.

This thing that some posters believe about finals appearance causing a late start to the preseason and impacting next year.... 

Players late to get going again. Compromised by unhealed injuries, post surgery recovery period, late to get back into aerobic fitness regime (despite playing and training a few weeks longer than non-finals teams) - yada yada yada 

At least a couple of teams in recent memory say ‘Hi’:

Brisbane Lions 2001-2004

Cats 2007-2011

Hawks 2013-2015

Guess I don’t subscribe to the theory that an athlete’s body goes to lard, butter and jelly the year after playing finals.

HTFUp

Edited by bjDee
forgot cats


12 minutes ago, bjDee said:

This thing that some posters believe about finals appearance causing a late start to the preseason and impacting next year.... 

Players late to get going again. Compromised by unhealed injuries, post surgery recovery period, late to get back into aerobic fitness regime (despite playing and training a few weeks longer than non-finals teams) - yada yada yada 

At least a couple of teams in recent memory say ‘Hi’:

Brisbane Lions 2001-2004

Cats 2007-2011

Hawks 2013-2015

Guess I don’t subscribe to the theory that an athlete’s body goes to lard, butter and jelly the year after playing finals.

HTFUp

Possibly the 3 greatest sides of all time, some of them taking the field nearly 20 years ago. Really relevant history there.

  • Author
20 minutes ago, bjDee said:

This thing that some posters believe about finals appearance causing a late start to the preseason and impacting next year.... 

Players late to get going again. Compromised by unhealed injuries, post surgery recovery period, late to get back into aerobic fitness regime (despite playing and training a few weeks longer than non-finals teams) - yada yada yada 

At least a couple of teams in recent memory say ‘Hi’:

Brisbane Lions 2001-2004

Cats 2007-2011

Hawks 2013-2015

Guess I don’t subscribe to the theory that an athlete’s body goes to lard, butter and jelly the year after playing finals.

HTFUp

Since we have come off a finals campaign for the first  time in over a decade,  apologists have to find some new ludicrous excuse to gild bad losses from the well worn ones when we were perennially bad. 

 

 

 

Edited by america de cali

14 minutes ago, Chook said:

Possibly the 3 greatest sides of all time

Thanks mate. Good luck defending that ambit claim 

 

14 minutes ago, Chook said:

some of them taking the field nearly 20 years ago. Really relevant history there.

But plenty in recent times...

Also Swans, Eagles, Crows, Giants etc with multiple recent (this decade - is that ok?) finals appearances say ‘Hi Chook’

Simple question: why are we making excuses?

Edited by bjDee

6 minutes ago, bjDee said:

Thanks mate. Good luck defending that ambit claim 

 

But plenty in recent times...

Also Swans, Eagles, Crows, Giants etc with multiple recent (this decade - is that ok?) finals appearances say ‘Hi Chook’

Simple question: why are we making excuses?

Who's making excuses? You're the one comparing Melbourne(!) to three of the best sides of all time, let alone this decade.

We've been a terrible footy side for near on 6 months now. I saw it personally in Perth last September, and it hasn't gone away, regardless of the events of the preseason that happened between then and now.

10 minutes ago, Chook said:

Who's making excuses?

Sheesh

That bit wasn’t directed at you. I invite you to read it in the context of my first sentence, post #35

It’s about the ability of teams to generate successive successes - as evidenced in this case by appearances in finals - it’s not about which team has the biggest gonads of all time. I’ll bow to your judgement on that. 

Edited by bjDee


3 minutes ago, bjDee said:

Sheesh

That bit wasn’t directed at you. I invite you to read it in the context of my first sentence, post #35

It’s about the ability of teams to generate successive successes - as evidenced in this case by appearances in finals - it’s not about which team has the biggest gonads of all time. I’ll bow to your judgement on that. 

mmm imagine Successive Successes mmmm

Just now, Sir Why You Little said:

mmm imagine Successive Successes mmmm

Screw that I just want isolated successes.

7 hours ago, hemingway said:

Goodwins comments will look good if we win, but if we don't he can assured that no-one from supporters to the media will be accepting excuses. 

I find it a strange comment, perhaps reflecting the pressure he is under to turn it around.

Two games in and he is talking about no further excuses, it sounds a little desperate after two games. Mid season or end of season, I could understand. 

Better to simply state, we expect to see improvement this week or we are going out expecting to win. 

I disagree. His comments resonate with me. I don't want to hear him come out and make excuses. He's saying there are none and that's what I want to hear from him. I'm sick of our mob from Gawn down, talking the talk in the media and then not backing it up.

Jeez, poor old Goody can't do much more. Damned if you do, damned if you don't stuff.

Just now, A F said:

I disagree. His comments resonate with me. I don't want to hear him come out and make excuses. He's saying there are none and that's what I want to hear from him. I'm sick of our mob from Gawn down, talking the talk in the media and then not backing it up.

Jeez, poor old Goody can't do much more. Damned if you do, damned if you don't stuff.

Goody's coaching skills, nous and tactics are going to be closely examined.

Unfortunately, he has problems with injuries and form, which makes his job that much more difficult. Our games todate make us look well off the pace. So he does have valid excuses. Our injury list and form are not figments of our imagination. 

I understand your sentiments but I think he could have chosen more appropriate words. We lose and his comments are going to hurt. And it is so early in the season. 

33 minutes ago, hemingway said:

Goody's coaching skills, nous and tactics are going to be closely examined.

Unfortunately, he has problems with injuries and form, which makes his job that much more difficult. Our games todate make us look well off the pace. So he does have valid excuses. Our injury list and form are not figments of our imagination. 

I understand your sentiments but I think he could have chosen more appropriate words. We lose and his comments are going to hurt. And it is so early in the season. 

I still disagree. We lose and he says, we have nowhere to hide. I don't see how this is a bad thing or how his comments are going to hurt. If anything, it should drive our group to thrive, not drown.


1 minute ago, A F said:

I still disagree. We lose and he says, we have nowhere to hide. I don't see how this is a bad thing or how his comments are going to hurt. If anything, it should drive our group to thrive, not drown.

As I said, I understand your thinking and I hope you are right.

26 minutes ago, A F said:

I disagree. His comments resonate with me. I don't want to hear him come out and make excuses. He's saying there are none and that's what I want to hear from him. I'm sick of our mob from Gawn down, talking the talk in the media and then not backing it up.

Jeez, poor old Goody can't do much more. Damned if you do, damned if you don't stuff.

 

I too am sick of all the talk.
Have been listening to the BS for decades.
Have to redeem ourselves every second week etc.

As for Goodys coaching.
We've butchered the ball going into the forward 50 with his famed "Chaos ball" since he's been in charge.
Lets just bang it in there and hope we can scrub enough through the goals seems to be the mantra.
Game plan is garbage.
Even worse now with the 666.
Coaches have been caught with their pants down.

Edited by Fork 'em

35 minutes ago, Fork 'em said:

I too am sick of all the talk.
Have been listening to the BS for decades.
Have to redeem ourselves every second week etc.

As for Goodys coaching.
We've butchered the ball going into the forward 50 with his famed "Chaos ball" since he's been in charge.
Lets just bang it in there and hope we can scrub enough through the goals seems to be the mantra.
Game plan is garbage.
Even worse now with the 666.
Coaches have been caught with their pants down.

Disagree. The same plan won Richmond and the Bulldogs a flag. It's not a garbage plan, particularly when you have such a dominant ruckman and midfield.

The debatable point for me is whether we've built a list that actually compliments that midfield and game style.

I'm beginning to feel that we need to invent our own style that uses the midfield dominance, but doesn't hand the opposition a slingshot back the other way to their own attack.

Edited by A F

 

Whereas I think Goodwin knows we have no-one in the midfield who can really deliver to forwards at an elite level so has just gone with the bomb it in there as often as you can and hope for the best mentality.

 

Edited by Fork 'em

6 hours ago, Satyriconhome said:

Absolute twaddle, don't know which bit some on here don't get, we have a team of 22 that has put in two poor performances, one where the midfield failed and were duly criticised,  the other where the midfield started to get it together but the team connection was horrible

We have players stuttering to find match day form, not from an injury point of view but pure and simple form

It may turnaround this week, but it will require 22 working as a team, that is what has been missing last 2 weeks, no excuses any more

Cmon Saty, you know i am not one to bag you, but this is utter rubbish. If you honestly believe we are not underdone and a our lack of fitness is not the key issue then i'm sorry i struggle to take your views on where the clubs is at seriously.

Your desire to tow some imaginary MFC line is like a footy version of the Stocckholm Syndrome. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies