Jump to content

Featured Replies

Took us some time, and we're putting up with some lopsided umpiring, but even with us not at our best we're still well and truly in the game.

Petracca and J Smith were the standouts that term.  I feel like Trac is switched on this year and ready to take some games apart on his own.  I think the new rules will take us a little time to adjust to, but I think our backline clicked more in that term and we set up our wall across half back quite well.

Zero worries from me so far.  Lions having a red hot dip but the cream for us is beginning to rise to the top.

 

Really liking Tracs game today. He's nailed the set shot, laid some big tackles and found a lot of ball. Definitely up there as our best to half time, and on track to have a career best game. Good signs heading into round 1 for the potential superstar!

From a coaching point of view, I'm disappointed to see we haven't developed any strategies to take advantage of the new kick in rule. We could be gaining so much more territory with the new rules, but we're still anchored to the goal square and kicking short. 

 
4 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Holding the ball? Nope. I guess that rule is gone now too. 

Jaded, didn’t you know if you pick it up and drop it like a hot potato while being tackled is ok, but picking it up and being tackled immediately by 3 opponents and trying to get rid of it is holding the ball lol ?

1 minute ago, blue and red in the head said:

Any chance of looking for a target in the forward 50 instead on just bombing it 20m out from goal? 

Give it time, the way Gil and Hocking love to make up [censored] on the fly, they'll soon be reducing the playing field 20m either end to increase scoring.

We'll look pretty good then!


Harmes out of the game for the day.  I don't know if it's precautionary or if it's a little more serious than that, but they just showed him in the rooms in his polo top.

Another positive from that term was our tackline pressure.  I think the stat towards the end was roughly 20-5 our way.  Add to the fact that we had more of the ball as well and that translates to much, much better pressure than the first term.

Hopefully it’s not a broken finger. 

 
4 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

From a coaching point of view, I'm disappointed to see we haven't developed any strategies to take advantage of the new kick in rule. We could be gaining so much more territory with the new rules, but we're still anchored to the goal square and kicking short. 

That’s humour yeah?

1 minute ago, Wiseblood said:

Harmes out of the game for the day.  I don't know if it's precautionary or if it's a little more serious than that, but they just showed him in the rooms in his polo top.

Off for an X-ray is my guess. Fingers can be really nasty. Got to hope it can be a quick fix 


6 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

I think you're referring to Christensen there GCDee. He came out of the ducking factory of Geelong so no surprises.

No no I mean Matheson... massive [censored]. 

Agree RE Christensen 

5 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

From a coaching point of view, I'm disappointed to see we haven't developed any strategies to take advantage of the new kick in rule. We could be gaining so much more territory with the new rules, but we're still anchored to the goal square and kicking short. 

Hopefully it’s a case of saving it for the real stuff 

28 minutes ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

How bad is Riewoldt as a commentator

Loved and hated him as a player. Hated him because he was so good against us.

Terrible commentator. Commented early that Steph Martin was clever for pushing forward and dragging Max back with him. Make Max play back which he isnt comfortable with and take away his ability to push forward. Will try to wear Max out.

It's like Riewoldt hasn't seen Max play.

1. Max goes back regularly. It's one of the main reasons why he is so good. He goes forward, back, midfield and takes the majority of the hit outs.

2. Max is the fittest ruck man in the comp. If anything Martin will wear himself out before Max.

Harmes is a worry.

We kicked more than we handballed, increased our entries into the forward 50 as a result, and significantly lifted our tackling rate that quarter.

Funny what happens when we decide to gaf, play simple football and do the non-negotiables well.


Lions I50 contested marking>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dees I50 contested marking.

We start taking a few and we walk away from them. The second QTR was a 180 turn as far as effort went by our boys.

Win or lose we just need to play like we intend to in the season proper.

Harmes reported as compound fracture...

FMD

Edited by ding

How many weeks is a compound fracture?

Edited by Males

2 minutes ago, GCDee said:

No no I mean Matheson... massive [censored]. 

Agree RE Christensen 

Agree with you on Mathieson. I'd love to take a bat to his face, but someone has obviously beaten me to it. Christensen got 2 of the duckiest free kicks to end that quarter. I don't wish injuries on players', but if he continues with that, he'll deserve the injury that is coming his way.

2 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

We kicked more than we handballed, increased our entries into the forward 50 as a result, and significantly lifted our tackling rate that quarter.

Funny what happens when we decide to gaf, play simple football and do the non-negotiables well.

And who knows what changed.  Did the Lions just surprise us a little out of the blocks?  Did we try and few things early, then tweaked them in the second term?  That stuff normally happens in JLT.  


6 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

Harmes out of the game for the day.  I don't know if it's precautionary or if it's a little more serious than that, but they just showed him in the rooms in his polo top.

Compound fracture, they are saying on the tv

Why do we continue to deliberately kick to top of the goal square? all high slow balls coming in.

 
1 minute ago, Demonland said:

Harmes compound fracture. 

What's the time frame for that?

If it's a decent length then, to me, that will be the only negative for the day.  A big one though for sure.

Just now, Damo said:

Why do we continue to deliberately kick to top of the goal square? all high slow balls coming in.

Did this last year as well. Disappointing to have not improved upon this so far


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies