Jump to content

Illicit Drug Use in AFL

Lucifers Hero
Lucifers Hero
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, DV8 said:

.........

Let the hair tests begin...  from the top down.   Starting with  Gillon,  and the commissions themselves...  then all the way down thru club CEO's,  and administrations,  and onto staff,  and then players.

Test them all,  if they want things to change.

and them pretenders in the northern stand too, eh?

  • Quote
    •  
    3 hours ago, rjay said:

    ...and they are treated as such if they are found in their system on game day as happened to the C/wood player last season.

    So there is no problem if the AFL don't test, the performance enhancing aspect is already covered by WADA.

     

    Collingwood players never tested positive for illicit drugs on game day. They tested positive to performance enhancing drugs. Which they claimed was within the illicit drugs they had took on the weekend.

  • Quote
    4 hours ago, rjay said:

    So there is no problem if the AFL don't test, the performance enhancing aspect is already covered by WADA.

    If WADA had their way the AFL would conduct weekly or fortnightly blood tests (for PED use)

    As it stands the AFL conducts (on average) 1 urine test per player per year.  Which is a token effort.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    36 minutes ago, Macca said:

    If WADA had their way the AFL would conduct weekly or fortnightly blood tests (for PED use)

    As it stands the AFL conducts (on average) 1 urine test per player per year.  Which is a token effort.

    The AFL conducts the urine tests? I thought it was ASADA that did that.

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Grimes Times said:

    Collingwood players never tested positive for illicit drugs on game day. They tested positive to performance enhancing drugs. Which they claimed was within the illicit drugs they had took on the weekend.

    Not this case 'Grimes'

    ...but Sam Murray who was tested positive on match day.

    https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/magpie-sam-murray-being-investigated-by-asada-20180824-p4zzh0.html

  • Quote

    Interesting discussion.

    From childhood we are taught that cheating is wrong. Therefore, the majority view the taking of performance enhancing substances as cheating.  And we pass judgement. 

    Cheats are people that break the rules.

    But it is not that simple. Some substances are banned, some not. Sports scientists around the world are always looking to find or develop substances that improve performance. When steroids were exposed the science and the sportspeople had moved on to EPO, and, later still, growth hormone and similar substances. So the line between banned and non banned substances is thin, despite the fact that non banned substances may improve performance. Caffeine for example.  But we don't regard drinking coffee or taking caffeine pills before an event as cheating.

    Most sports participants consume or take supplements that they think will improve performance and the chance of winning. Some are banned, some not.  Often the moral question is blurred by the view that everyone else is doing it, therefore making it more acceptable. 

    In regard to illicit recreational drugs, there are those that think it is wrong and should be punished. And in most cases it is a criminal offence. There are others that regard taking drugs as a normal and acceptable pastime. The use of marijuana is a case in point. Marijuana can be pleasurable and safe for some and also can assist those in pain and with mental illness.  Yet at the same time, it can damage peoples health and well being. In some cases these recreational drugs can improve physical performance. In other cases, it can adversely affect performance. 

    What's, the answer ?

    Like all health issues, information and education can assist.

    Drug testing and punishment only goes so far and will never eradicate the behaviour.

    Human nature being what it is, many will continue to take substances that make themselves feel better, improve performance and in the case of sport, give themselves an advantage, whether it is viewed as cheating or not 

    In some cases, it can lead to the ravages of addiction. Cousins is an example of a life destroyed. 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Ignoring the moral arguments, I'm amazed that professional athletes who seem to have to pursue highly specific diets and exercise regimens would then participate in taking substances that wouldn't be on any list approved by the club's dietitians or sports scientists.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    57 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    The AFL conducts the urine tests? I thought it was ASADA that did that.

    I obviously 'meant' conducted tests ... whoever does those tests was never my point.

    So what do you think about the AFL's token efforts towards PED use?

    I urune test per year per player ... it might be 2 tests. 

    Do you think the sport is clean?

  • Quote
    •  
    14 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    Ignoring the moral arguments, I'm amazed that professional athletes who seem to have to pursue highly specific diets and exercise regimens would then participate in taking substances that wouldn't be on any list approved by the club's dietitians or sports scientists.

    And when Hogan was photographed smoking a cigarette that freaked me out a bit. What was the point, there is no upside. At least with most recreational drugs there is some sort of nice mood altering pay off. Ciggies are merely the worlds slowest form of suicide

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    2 hours ago, daisycutter said:

    and them pretenders in the northern stand too, eh?

    If they are board members, dc, YES.

     

    How much white powders do you think we would all find out about, if all CEO's and Board Members across the Australian business nation,  were Hair Tested ?

     

    Like the catholic news today, we would all be shocked by the revelations.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    42 minutes ago, Macca said:

    I obviously 'meant' conducted tests ... whoever does those tests was never my point.

    So what do you think about the AFL's token efforts towards PED use?

    I urune test per year per player ... it might be 2 tests. 

    Do you think the sport is clean?

    Where does the one or two tests per year figure come from?

    To answer your question, I don't know whether the AFL's efforts are "token" or otherwise. What I do know is that I find any use of performance enhancing drugs or masking agents abhorrent and any use of recreational drugs by professional athletes to be bizarrely stupid behaviour. 

  • Quote

    The last few days Grant Thomas has stated players are citing "mental health issues" to dodge the illicit drug policy. Nick Riewoldt has backed it up by saying players are taking the p.iss. Now Jack Steven is taking indefinite leave from the Saints for "mental health" reasons

    Just sayin....

    We wish Jack all the best.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    7 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    Where does the one or two tests per year figure come from?

    Try google  - you'll have your answer in no time.

  • Quote

    The trouble with the AFL policy is any player who takes time off with mental problems (or a long term mystery injury) will be painted with the drug brush even if it is far from true.

  • Quote
    17 minutes ago, Macca said:

    Try google  - you'll have your answer in no time.

    Tried...and failed. Mind you, it's not that I don't want to believe you, I'm just following Ronald Reagan's policy of "Trust but verify".

  • Quote

    18 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    Tried...and failed. Mind you, it's not that I don't want to believe you, I'm just following Ronald Reagan's policy of "Trust but verify".

    Bottom line ...

    They may as well shut WADA down ... a miniscule organisation with no teeth.  Not their fault either ... it is just the way it is LDvC.

  • Quote
    On 2/25/2019 at 11:32 AM, Ethan Tremblay said:

    One strike and I lose my job. The AFL are ridiculously lenient on their players. I have no doubt that this ‘leniency’ contributes to players dabbling in illegal drug use. 

    Exactly right. 

    Drugs are illegal. You get caught you get punished. Sure you don’t get a jail sentence on a first strike, but you’ll likely get a good behavior bond, maybe community service or a suspended sentence. Why are AFL players excluded from that?

  • Quote
    3 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    Tried...and failed

    You're right,  there's not much there (although there was a few years ago)

    Found this article but I think if the figure was North of 1500 tests per year these days there would be some sort of recent internet history pointing us that way.  And with 700+ players in the system,  the average wouldn't be more than 2 tests per year.   And they aren't blood tests (which is another issue)

    By the way,  the reason I've brought PED use into the conversation is that I see a correlation & connection between illicit drugs & performance enhancing drugs.  Just my opinion but the dealers would be dealing both so why wouldn't those seeking these drugs seek both?  

    AFL targets stars for performance-enhancing drugs testing (May 2011)

  • Quote
    3 hours ago, Macca said:

    You're right,  there's not much there (although there was a few years ago)

    Found this article but I think if the figure was North of 1500 tests per year these days there would be some sort of recent internet history pointing us that way.  And with 700+ players in the system,  the average wouldn't be more than 2 tests per year.   And they aren't blood tests (which is another issue)

    By the way,  the reason I've brought PED use into the conversation is that I see a correlation & connection between illicit drugs & performance enhancing drugs.  Just my opinion but the dealers would be dealing both so why wouldn't those seeking these drugs seek both?  

    AFL targets stars for performance-enhancing drugs testing (May 2011)

    Maybe the holes in the NET weren't big enough, 'DC' ?

    144914-004-4BF6B923.gif

     

  • Quote

    Me thinks Eddie protests too much.
    I heard a rumour a while back it was his mob dodging tests with mental health issues.

    Edited by Fork 'em

  • Quote

    15 hours ago, jnrmac said:

    The last few days Grant Thomas has stated players are citing "mental health issues" to dodge the illicit drug policy. Nick Riewoldt has backed it up by saying players are taking the p.iss. Now Jack Steven is taking indefinite leave from the Saints for "mental health" reasons

    Just sayin....

    We wish Jack all the best.

    So an official declaration from any club that "player X now has a mental health issue and is stepping aside from the game for an undefined period of time" means he is ineligible for testing while absent?

  • Quote
    12 hours ago, Macca said:

    You're right,  there's not much there (although there was a few years ago)

    Found this article but I think if the figure was North of 1500 tests per year these days there would be some sort of recent internet history pointing us that way.  And with 700+ players in the system,  the average wouldn't be more than 2 tests per year.   And they aren't blood tests (which is another issue)

    By the way,  the reason I've brought PED use into the conversation is that I see a correlation & connection between illicit drugs & performance enhancing drugs.  Just my opinion but the dealers would be dealing both so why wouldn't those seeking these drugs seek both?  

    AFL targets stars for performance-enhancing drugs testing (May 2011)

    I think including PEDs in the discussion is unavoidable. There's a fine line between "recreational" and "performance enhancing" at the best of times which becomes even more blurred when you include masking agents.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    15 hours ago, Jaded said:

    Exactly right. 

    Drugs are illegal. You get caught you get punished. Sure you don’t get a jail sentence on a first strike, but you’ll likely get a good behavior bond, maybe community service or a suspended sentence. Why are AFL players excluded from that?

    They're not. If the police catch them with drugs they get charged. Simple.

    It is not the AFL's - or any employer for that matter - job to catch and punish players who break the law. If it is why stop at drug use. What about tax avoidance?  Assault? Copyright?

  • Quote
    • Like 4
     
    5 minutes ago, binman said:

    They're not. If the police catch them with drugs they get charged. Simple.

    It is not the AFL's - or any employer for that matter - job to catch and punish players who break the law. If it is why stop at drug use. What about tax avoidance?  Assault? Copyright?

    The AFL, and professional sport in general, is not like most workplaces. That's why the AFL has an enforceable rule that allows action to be taken against a player or official who may not have even broken a law but "brings the game into disrepute". Not many businesses (or vocations) have the ability to take action for bringing that particular industry (vocation) into "disrepute". Though recent findings of some Royal Commissions perhaps suggest it would be a good idea. 

  • Quote
    11 hours ago, Rusty Nails said:

    So an official declaration from any club that "player X now has a mental health issue and is stepping aside from the game for an undefined period of time" means he is ineligible for testing while absent?

    Not sure but its an interesting point. MH would take precendence you would think.

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 10

      The Sir Doug Nicholls Round kicks off in Darwin with a Top 4 clash between the Suns and the Hawks. On Friday night the Swans will be seeking to rebound from a challenging start to the season, while the Blues have the Top 8 in their sights after their sluggish start. Saturdays matches kick off with a blockbuster between the Collingwood and Kuwarna with the Magpies looking to maintain their strong form and the Crows aiming to make a statement on the road. The Power face a difficult task to revive their season against a resilient Cats side looking to make amends for their narrow loss last week. The Giants aim to reinforce their top-eight status, while the Dockers will be looking to break the travel hoodoo. The sole Saturday game is a critical matchup for both teams, as the Bulldogs strive to cemet their spot in the top six and the Bombers desperately want break into the 8. Sundays start with a bottom 3 clash between the Tigers and Kangaroos with both teams wanting to avoid the being in wooden spoon contention. The Round concludes with the Eagles still searching for their first win of the season, while the Saints look to keep their finals hopes alive with a crucial away victory. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

        • Thanks
      • 1 reply
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Brisbane

      And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 9 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Hawthorn

      There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Footscray

      At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

        • Thanks
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Brisbane

      The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 141 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Hawthorn

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 52 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All