Jump to content

Is this the end of the VFL

Diamond_Jim
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

Strange article in the Age about the AFL considering:

1. Increasing the draft age by 6 months (sounds sensible I think)

2. Decreasing the number of coaches

3. Decreasing the number of players on a club's list.

Why I say it is strange is that it reads like they want development to occur outside the AFL system and a natural affect of decreasing list size is that the clubs would not be able to field a reserves side.

The concepts are muddled but need to be discussed.

"The AFL is considering changes to the draft age and cutting the number of players and coaches at clubs as part of an overhaul of football departments.

The number of coaches at clubs or the number permitted to work at games on match day could also be cut as part of the changes being discussed.

The option to increase the draft age by six months and to trim the number of players on club lists to a number yet to be determined are among options being canvassed by the AFL as a way of overhauling club lists."

"The argument for cutting lists sizes isthat with fewer players on a list you require fewer coaches at clubs and that it is the least talented players that take up most of the time of development coaches at AFL level."

https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl/afl-considers-cutting-number-of-players-coaches-at-clubs-20180725-p4ztgg.html

  • Quote
    •  

    Why does the AFL care how many coaches are squeezed into the coaches box?  And if some were outside the box, how do you limit the number of people coaching?  Does advice from Demonlanders in the Match Day thread count as coaching......

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
    • Author
    2 minutes ago, sue said:

    Why does the AFL care how many coaches are squeezed into the coaches box?  And if some were outside the box, how do you limit the number of people coaching?  Does advice from Demonlanders in the Match Day thread count as coaching......

    the argument seems to be that the game is "overcoached" and players are not performing to their natural best

  • Quote
    •  
    10 minutes ago, sue said:

    Why does the AFL care how many coaches are squeezed into the coaches box?  And if some were outside the box, how do you limit the number of people coaching?  Does advice from Demonlanders in the Match Day thread count as coaching......

    probably at the suggestion of channel 7 but i can't find any logic to it from channel 7's view but then who says there is any logic in the afl's decisions anyway

    a better idea would be to reduce the size of the afl media unit. there is obviously too much unproductive development of unskilled journos going on there. and cut back the salaries and bonuses of afl execs too because they would have less staff to lord it over 

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    • Love 1
    • Haha 1

    Is Gil the biggest idiot to ever see over the league? Crash test dummies and erratic reactionary changes

  • Quote
    • Like 12
    • Love 1

    46 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

    1. Increasing the draft age by 6 months (sounds sensible I think)

    In principle this argument as run by the likes of Roos seems sensible.

    Unfortunately as much as the AFL likes to think of itself as the major code and that it will be forever and a day, it won't be.

    The AFL is not run in a vacuum (the only vacuum is in Dill's big head).

    It just opens up the young talent to other sports.

    Cricket is now a real threat with more money and opportunity in the short form game, basketball is growing again and kids have big opportunities o/s, not to mention the huge cash in soccer for talented kids worldwide.

    6 months is a long time for a kid (it basically  means a year in football terms). Will I go to cricket and get my couple of hundred k starting now (opportunity of millions in near future) or should I be running around playing park footy for another year with no guarantee's???

    I believe we will look back on the McLaughlin era as the big error of football that started the rot & pushed it back to being a regional amateur sport like Gaelic football is now.

    I just hope we get a Melbourne premiership whilst it's still a premier sport and means something.

    By the way, anyone who thinks they can build a solid pathway around the country has rocks in their heads. They don't have the money and won't use what will be better spent lining their pockets.

  • Quote

    I think it is AFL head office that needs pruning. Too many highly paid executives and pseudo analysts with too much time on their hands in my opinion. 

    Looks like a list of solutions in search of a problem! 

    Edited by Earl Hood

  • Quote
    • Like 17
    • Love 3
    • Author
    2 hours ago, Earl Hood said:

    I think it is AFL head office that needs pruning. Too many highly paid executives and pseudo analysts with too much time on their hands in my opinion. 

    Looks like a list of solutions in search of a problem! 

    Agree Earl

    As I said in my OP I found the mix of topics strange indeed.

    I think the VFL is a good program although it has a few obvious weaknesses.The obvious concern with it is how the non aligned clubs will survive longer term both from a competitive and financial viewpoint. Then there is the cost of maintaining facilities at places like Coburg, Box Hill etc

  • Quote
    •  
    4 hours ago, rjay said:

    In principle this argument as run by the likes of Roos seems sensible.

    Unfortunately as much as the AFL likes to think of itself as the major code and that it will be forever and a day, it won't be.

    The AFL is not run in a vacuum (the only vacuum is in Dill's big head).

    It just opens up the young talent to other sports.

    Cricket is now a real threat with more money and opportunity in the short form game, basketball is growing again and kids have big opportunities o/s, not to mention the huge cash in soccer for talented kids worldwide.

    6 months is a long time for a kid (it basically  means a year in football terms). Will I go to cricket and get my couple of hundred k starting now (opportunity of millions in near future) or should I be running around playing park footy for another year with no guarantee's???

    I believe we will look back on the McLaughlin era as the big error of football that started the rot & pushed it back to being a regional amateur sport like Gaelic football is now.

    I just hope we get a Melbourne premiership whilst it's still a premier sport and means something.

    By the way, anyone who thinks they can build a solid pathway around the country has rocks in their heads. They don't have the money and won't use what will be better spent lining their pockets.

    A strange post, Gaelic football was always an amateur sport and never enjoyed popularity outside Ireland or expat communities. Footy is expanding at the moment and is the predominant code in most of the country, however the AFL needs to rid itself of the delusion that it can expand overseas. It won’t, and any idea that it ever could was simply a pipe dream.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    The AFL are doing what they do best which is [censored] up the game. If they want better games stop scheduling Carlton StKilda and the Bulldogs on Friday and Saturday nights.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    37 minutes ago, Goffer said:

    A strange post, Gaelic football was always an amateur sport and never enjoyed popularity outside Ireland or expat communities. Footy is expanding at the moment and is the predominant code in most of the country, however the AFL needs to rid itself of the delusion that it can expand overseas. It won’t, and any idea that it ever could was simply a pipe dream.

    Hey Goffer what about AFLX? ?

  • Quote

    I must say I have been worried for the future of the VFL since they scrapped the Development League. 

  • Quote

    Pardon my ignorance, or my stupidity, but what in the hell are those who are developing, returning from injury or 'depth' players supposed to do?

    And what about clubs who get a long injury list if there is a significant reduction in list size?   Do they 'do an Essendon' and ask for supplementary (not supplemented) players?

    Sounds like yet another  typical Gillon inspired half baked idea.

     

  • Quote

    I'm assuming Channel 7 have asked Gill to have all coaches fired except for Chris Scott so they can just film his reactions?

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1

    Speculating, but my gut is saying that the reduction in list size will be one side of a deal that sees the introduction of mid-season rookies to be taken from the 2s. As a back door to then slip in mid-season trades.

    Because one thing we all know, is that the media and AFL HQ are convinced that the biggest spectacle in the game is hyperventilating about stars like Franklin, Ablett, Dangerfield, and Folau...

    The idea itself, of being able to recruit a vfl player to cover injury, isn't so bad provided that the glaringly obvious need to invest a lot more in the '2s' levels across the country.

  • Quote

    3 hours ago, Goffer said:

    Footy is expanding at the moment and is the predominant code in most of the country,

    Footy isn't expanding at the moment, it's in decline.

    The numbers are down & that's why the AFL are looking at radical rule changes.

    They have got to be kidding themselves if they think they can set up a pathway like the US college system here.

  • Quote
    14 hours ago, Goffer said:

    A strange post, Gaelic football was always an amateur sport and never enjoyed popularity outside Ireland or expat communities. Footy is expanding at the moment and is the predominant code in most of the country, however the AFL needs to rid itself of the delusion that it can expand overseas. It won’t, and any idea that it ever could was simply a pipe dream.

    Wholeheartedly agree . It is so naive to think that AFL could “take” in a foreign country when it can’t even conquer the whole of Australia let alone greater western Sydney ! 

  • Quote
    14 hours ago, rjay said:

    Footy isn't expanding at the moment, it's in decline.

    The numbers are down & that's why the AFL are looking at radical rule changes.

    They have got to be kidding themselves if they think they can set up a pathway like the US college system here.

    Which numbers? I expect TV ratings are down, but what about crowd attendances? And overall revenues?

  • Quote
    • Author
    14 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    Which numbers? I expect TV ratings are down, but what about crowd attendances? And overall revenues?

    crowd numbers as a percentage of population are trending down year on year.

    Revenues go up to some extent because of greater corporate revenues and ticket price increases. Of course the bulk of the revenue comes from the media deals.

    A sustained corporate downturn such we saw post 1988 would seriously challenge today's AFL revenue model.

    Edited by Diamond_Jim

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

    There's obviously a bigger picture at play here as these changes don't make a whole deal of sense. I'd suggest the long term goal wouldn't go down very well with current club supporters so it'll be small steps along the way that may sneak through under the radar.

    Raise the draft age and those now ineligible would probably play in a VFL type competition. Reduce the number of players and coaches, and those will also be looking for a gig in a lower competition. So what I'm seeing is an attempt to strengthen those comps.

    Is it possible they're looking at evolving into a tiered competition with 2(?) leagues and promotion/relegation depending on performance? EPL style.

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

        • Thanks
      • 25 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

        • Thanks
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

        • Thanks
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 232 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
    View All