Jump to content

Featured Replies

By my count we have:

Delisted 4 - Bugg, McKenna, King and  Pedo as well as 1 rookie - Filopovic

2 have retired - Vince and Balic

Kent has asked for a trade to StKilda.

Hogan may be requesting a trade to Freo

That amounts to up to 8 spots plus a rookie spot, 7 are a certainty. That seems like a lot of space being freed up for a club with no first round pick and probably only 3 selections worth anything at all. 

I know from past form that Jason, Todd and the crew always have a plan, I wonder what it is. Any inside knowledge on Demonland?

 

It sounds like Preuss will be one addition, although for what I'm not sure.  If it's for a pick then it cancels itself out.

Could we have our eye on a few state league additions that we can nab with late picks?  I'd say we might be in the frame to upgrade Keilty, especially with Pedersen retiring, so that takes one spot so we can rookie another player.

Either way it does seem that we have a variety of options going into the off season which can only be a good thing.

I'd hope the club is looking to bring in a free agent or 2. The only one I am aware of that is any good is Gaff and the rumour is he may be off to North. I'm not sure if there are any others worth looking at, other d'landers may have more info?

If Hogan goes then the deal probably turns into 3 or 4 draft picks that we on trade for players we have already earmarked or we then use them in the draft(not desired).

 

We have been running the max 40 + 4. We could run the minimum 38 + 4 + 2 Cat B.  Then we've got 2 less spots to fill

Given we're really clearing out the cupboard, a number of players must be about to nominate us. Otherwise, it doesn't make a lot of sense to me given our lack of decent picks.

The list strategy is clearly to up the ante now that we are in our premiership window though. Exciting.


so so far the retirements, delistings, next gen academy selection, plus trade rumour mill has it as...

OUT: Balic, Vince, Bugg, McKenna, King. Pedersen, Filopovic (rookie), Kent (to St. Kilda), Hogan (to Fremantle)
IN: Preuss, May, Kade Kolodjashnij, Bedford (likely to cost our first current pick)

with four short on the list, i'd like to think we're getting two high end picks PLUS may for hogan, but sadly think it's less rather than more likely

plus there's the standard rumour that tyson is on the chopping block, avb and jkh are still yet to be signed as far as i am aware, 

but presuming they stay and we don't add another experienced player to that list, here's a rough go at best squad for round 1 next year, up against the reigning premiers collingwood on a friday night at the g, with thankfully no fitness concerns...

B: Jetta - May - Lever
HB: Salem - O Mac - Hibberd
?: Viney - Brayshaw - KK
HF: Petracca - T Mac - ANB
F: Preuss - Weideman - Melksham
Foll: Gawn - Oliver - Harmes
I/c: Jones - Spargo - vandenBerg - Fritsch
Emerg: Lewis - Frost - Hannan - J Smith

Funny that Joel Smith is borderline to get an emergency spot (choice of him or Hunt), in my ideal world, when we most recently played an preliminary final - a change to the side that i completely understood from a match-up point at the time...even if Smith did end up playing forward at stages

Edited by whatwhatsaywhat

 

A lot of discussion about perceived large list changes.  Here's the numbers from last year:

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.triplem.com.au/sport/afl/news/2017-afl-retirements-and-delistings/amp

Adelaide 8. Brisbane 12. Carlton 13. Collingwood 8. Essendon 8. Fremantle 12. Geelong 7. Gold Coast 12. GWS 8. Hawthorn 8. Melbourne 8. North 8. Port 11. Richmond 7. Saints 8. Sydney 8. West Coast 12. Dogs 9.

8 is the magic number, minimum is two 7s.  Our projected number of around 10 is not an outlier.  WC 12 and in the GF

Retired. Balic and Vince

Delisted.  King Pedersen Bugg Mckenna Filopovc (rookie)

Potential trade out ?? Kent stkilda Hogan Freo Vandenburg swans 

thats 10 out??

potential trade ins. May. Preuss.  kolodashnji

Hoping for a miracle to get a Shiel Gaff or Kelly 

thats a busy period ahead


5 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

A lot of discussion about perceived large list changes.  Here's the numbers from last year:

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www.triplem.com.au/sport/afl/news/2017-afl-retirements-and-delistings/amp

Adelaide 8. Brisbane 12. Carlton 13. Collingwood 8. Essendon 8. Fremantle 12. Geelong 7. Gold Coast 12. GWS 8. Hawthorn 8. Melbourne 8. North 8. Port 11. Richmond 7. Saints 8. Sydney 8. West Coast 12. Dogs 9.

8 is the magic number, minimum is two 7s.  Our projected number of around 10 is not an outlier.  WC 12 and in the GF

Great informative post, interesting. Brisbane big improvers with 12 and West Coast a premiership with 12 also, puts my mind at ease.

i wonder if we'd look at fasolo as a crumbling forward?.. i'd rather gamble on him than anyone from the saints.

can someone tell me why we aren't interested in chad wingard? for a team that torched so many shots at goal id love wingard up there. he also helps our leg speed when playing stints in the middle. 

4 minutes ago, Dr.D said:

can someone tell me why we aren't interested in chad wingard? for a team that torched so many shots at goal id love wingard up there. he also helps our leg speed when playing stints in the middle. 

because he wants $1m a year and he ain't worth it

7 hours ago, Rocky said:

i wonder if we'd look at fasolo as a crumbling forward?.. i'd rather gamble on him than anyone from the saints.

going to carlton

4 minutes ago, Dr.D said:

can someone tell me why we aren't interested in chad wingard? for a team that torched so many shots at goal id love wingard up there. he also helps our leg speed when playing stints in the middle. 

He is staying at Port.

He way over valued his worth and no one took a bite, so he's heading back with his tail between his legs.


So i know a few on here attended the Best and Fairest last night.

Surely there were whispers in the rooms in regards to Hogan or future trade targets this trade period??

On 9/29/2018 at 6:59 PM, spirit of norm smith said:

Retired. Balic and Vince

Delisted.  King Pedersen Bugg Mckenna Filopovc (rookie)

Potential trade out ?? Kent stkilda Hogan Freo Vandenburg swans 

thats 10 out??

potential trade ins. May. Preuss.  kolodashnji

Hoping for a miracle to get a Shiel Gaff or Kelly 

thats a busy period ahead

Update.   7 off the list. 

4 trades potentially out. Kent to Saints. Vandenburg to Swans. Hogan to Freo. Tyson to anywhere. 

Trade Ins?  Preuss. May (if Hogan goes home to Freo). Kolodjashnij. 

7 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Update.   7 off the list. 

4 trades potentially out. Kent to Saints. Vandenburg to Swans. Hogan to Freo. Tyson to anywhere. 

Trade Ins?  Preuss. May (if Hogan goes home to Freo). Kolodjashnij. 

By my reckoning we'd still have a squad of 28 ready to play AFL players even with the 11 out and none in. 

44-11=33. Only 5 not ready: Maynard, Baker, Petty, Johnstone and Keilty - even then all of these are close.  So I think the depth crisis that some are worried about is overblown.

Our depth is hiding in plain sight.

If the full 11 are off then there's 28/33 ready to go.

There's the 22 from the PF minus VDB and Tyson = 20

Plus 8 ready to go: Lever, Stretch, JKH, Hunt, Fritsch, Garlett, T.Smith, Wagner

Plus 5 development: Maynard, Baker, Petty, Johnstone, Keilty - some of them could play in 2019 too.

That's if everyone mentioned leaves and before we add any.


If VDB and Tyson are traded, the midfield before any additions looks like:

Core (5): Jones, Harmes, Viney, Brayshaw, Oliver

Mid/Fwds and Mid/Backs (4): Petracca, ANB, Fritsch, Salem

Fringe (2): Stretch, JKH

Development (2): Maynard, Baker

3 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

If VDB and Tyson are traded, the midfield before any additions looks like:

Core (5): Jones, Harmes, Viney, Brayshaw, Oliver

Mid/Fwds and Mid/Backs (4): Petracca, ANB, Fritsch, Salem

Fringe (2): Stretch, JKH

Development (2): Maynard, Baker

Yep, pretty clear we'll need to land a mid who is a big fish. 

Jones played mid for much of the second half of the season (even without Viney).

We really need Petracca to take another step and have a break out game or two next season.

We can't afford to stand still or rest on our laurels. Our midfield is good, statistically great, but I reckon we're still 2 or 3 core and mid/fwd/mid/backs off premiership material. If KK can come in and provide something on a wing and off half back, Petracca lifts another peg, Harmes and Brayshaw continue their development and we land a big mid fish, we can win it in 2019.

If we don't land a big fish and lsoe VBD and Tyson, I reckon we're a bit thin in there. An injury or two and all of a sudden we haven't really improved our midfield.

Yes, there'll be natural improvement, but I hope we're still going hard for that fish.

 
On 10/2/2018 at 7:46 AM, Dr.D said:

can someone tell me why we aren't interested in chad wingard? for a team that torched so many shots at goal id love wingard up there. he also helps our leg speed when playing stints in the middle. 

Don't know...  can you tell me why he is on the outer with Port ?    seems sus to me.?

2 hours ago, A F said:

Yep, pretty clear we'll need to land a mid who is a big fish. 

Jones played mid for much of the second half of the season (even without Viney).

We really need Petracca to take another step and have a break out game or two next season.

We can't afford to stand still or rest on our laurels. Our midfield is good,

statistically great, but I reckon we're still 2 or 3 core and mid/fwd/mid/backs off premiership material.

If KK can come in and provide something on a wing and off half back, Petracca lifts another peg, Harmes and Brayshaw continue their development and we land a big mid fish, we can win it in 2019.

If we don't land a big fish and lsoe VBD and Tyson, I reckon we're a bit thin in there. An injury or two and all of a sudden we haven't really improved our midfield.

Yes, there'll be natural improvement, but I hope we're still going hard for that fish.

I agree, 'AF'.

IMO we were a bit thing before the Grand Final    Now with a couple going off, we are very thin.

We MUST bring in a topline inside mid this trade period...  one who can run with the ball.

 

And some wide types, who are un-afraid.

 

I have just finished Re-watching the Prelim, and the Cats game... 

I am not convinced Re Purrtracca.  A boy in a mans body.

.

Edited by DV8


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 94 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Love
      • Like
    • 356 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies