Jump to content

The Jack Watts in 2018 Thread

Ugottobekidding
Ugottobekidding
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

28 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Watts kicks 6 goals in a JLT community game and the posters who wanted to keep him use this as a ‘I told you so’. Wow wee. 

And of course none of those who wanted him gone will say 'I told you so' after any poor performances he makes this year.     

    • Like 2
     
    1 minute ago, sue said:

    And of course none of those who wanted him gone will say 'I told you so' after any poor performances he makes this year.     

    They had their opportunity after his performance in JLT1. I didn’t read any. 

    • Like 1
    19 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

    They had their opportunity after his performance in JLT1. I didn’t read any. 

    I'm sure I saw some.  In any case, a flat performance is unlikely to attract as much 'enthusiasm'  as a 6 goal match so it's not surprising that 'opportunity' didn't create a whole thread.  But I bet we'll see some video clips of dropped easy marks etc during the year if he's still exciting interest in Dland. 

    The best the rest of us can hope for is that his performance (or better, ours) is such that nether side feels the need to indulge in 'I told you so'.  

     
    7 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

    Watts may conceivably win the Brownlow, win the Norm Smith Medal and the Coleman medal with Port Adelaide this year. All that matters though, is whether he would have performed to that standard if he had stayed with us. The evidence to date suggests that he would not. Hence, the club decided it was time for him to move on. Will I feel shortchanged if he stars for PA? Maybe, but my chagrin will be not for trading him, but for woefully mismanaging him in the early years.  

    I think it's a stretch to say that a 26 year old player of Watts' type wouldn't have performed at his peak in a Melbourne jumper this year. Look at his 2016 year. He was trending in the right direction. 2017 was injury affected as we know.

    We put 9 years of development into him with all the patience and hair tearing, only to palm him off right when he's about to enter his best few years of football. It was a bold decision to say the least.  

    The main solace is that we look to have replaced him with another kid who has serious natural ability.

    • Like 3
    7 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

    Watts kicks 6 goals in a JLT community game and the posters who wanted to keep him use this as a ‘I told you so’. Wow wee. 

    Agree, this will never be resolved between the keep him brigade and the send him to purgatory mob. Although, I reckon there are a few more fence sitters today.

    The judgement will rest and fall on the success or failure of the MFC or PA, and Watt's own performance. I was one of the keep him brigade, however, with his departure it feels like a veil has been lifted from the club. 

    I will be one surprised lad if he has a stellar year after 9 years with the Demons and PA make the Granny. If his form is not up to scratch, the PA fans will make mincemeat out of him. A very unforgiving mob. 

    • Like 1

    2 hours ago, P-man said:

    I think it's a stretch to say that a 26 year old player of Watts' type wouldn't have performed at his peak in a Melbourne jumper this year.

    1

    A 26 year old player of Watts' type wouldn't have performed at his peak in a Melbourne jumper this year.

    Any more than he did last year.

    1 hour ago, hemingway said:

    The judgement will rest and fall on the success or failure of the MFC or PA, and Watt's own performance.

    No it won't, because even if he performs well at PA, you can't assume that he would have done the same at Melbourne.

    • Like 2
    20 minutes ago, bing181 said:

    A 26 year old player of Watts' type wouldn't have performed at his peak in a Melbourne jumper this year.

    Any more than he did last year.

    Why? How can you posssibly rule it out that unequivocally? Tell me it’s a reason outside of the pressure of being the number one draft.

    Last year was injury interrupted. Not the best means of assessment. What did you think of his year before that?

    Ugh. I’m slipping into another Watts vortex and he’s not even a Melbourne player anymore. I’ll let you have the last word.

    Edited by P-man

    • Like 1
     
    21 hours ago, P-man said:

    Why? How can you posssibly rule it out that unequivocally? Tell me it’s a reason outside of the pressure of being the number one draft.

    Last year was injury interrupted. Not the best means of assessment. What did you think of his year before that?

    Ugh. I’m slipping into another Watts vortex and he’s not even a Melbourne player anymore. I’ll let you have the last word.

    True, but if I understand correctly, it's would appear to be his less than professional approach to rehab from that injury which finally convinced the club that it was time for the club and him to part ways. 

    • Like 1
    On 13 March 2018 at 8:40 AM, bing181 said:

    A 26 year old player of Watts' type wouldn't have performed at his peak in a Melbourne jumper this year.

    Any more than he did last year.

    A big call.  As a couple of others have suggested, he was travelling pretty well for much of last season.  Anyway, he's gone now and I hope that the FD will have a real good look at what happened and try to improve the way in which we deal with talented, intelligent players of his ilk.  There is no single approach which works with all types of players and, in Watts' case, whatever they decided to do simply didn't work as well as we (and he, I suspect) would have hoped.  There is a great need for players that have limited imagination, who can follow instructions and inspire by example.  There is also a need for the type of player with an appropriate skill-set that can recognise an obscured opportunity and grasp it.  These players are more difficult to counter because they are less predictable.  An appropriate mix of both types would hopefully produce winning football.  Occasionally, one player will be a mixture of both (e.g. Dangerfield, Ablett Jnr).  It will be interesting to see who emerges to fill this apparent void.

     

    • Like 1

    Can this thread (and thread title) be used for all Jack Watts related correspondence for the rest of his career?

     

    Just your one stop shop for all Jack Watts.

    • Like 1
    10 hours ago, Jimcor2 said:

    A big call.  As a couple of others have suggested, he was travelling pretty well for much of last season.  Anyway, he's gone now and I hope that the FD will have a real good look at what happened and try to improve the way in which we deal with talented, intelligent players of his ilk.  There is no single approach which works with all types of players and, in Watts' case, whatever they decided to do simply didn't work as well as we (and he, I suspect) would have hoped.  There is a great need for players that have limited imagination, who can follow instructions and inspire by example.  There is also a need for the type of player with an appropriate skill-set that can recognise an obscured opportunity and grasp it.  These players are more difficult to counter because they are less predictable.  An appropriate mix of both types would hopefully produce winning football.  Occasionally, one player will be a mixture of both (e.g. Dangerfield, Ablett Jnr).  It will be interesting to see who emerges to fill this apparent void.

     

    image.jpeg.37ff223efebb5d629a45232a24f6f4c4.jpeg

    •
    • Like 2
    On 3/13/2018 at 9:02 AM, deejammin' said:

    Geez a second or third key forward who can kick 6 goals and give off a few would be handy if Tom McDonalds foot injury keeps him out for an extended period...

    I said it when we traded him and I see no reason to change, it was a silly decision to trade away a talented player capable of playing as a second or third forward when our KPF stocks are so thin. We are now down to Hogan and Pederson for round one, any bad luck with injury or suspension and we will be forced to play Weiderman or Smith. I hope those guys play as well as Jack will for Port or we’ll look very, very silly.....

    Best return from Jack in a real game? 4 goals

    You'd be the kind of person still waiting for Col Sylvia to have a good pre-season.....

    • Like 3
    11 hours ago, Jimcor2 said:

    A big call.  As a couple of others have suggested, he was travelling pretty well for much of last season.  Anyway, he's gone now and I hope that the FD will have a real good look at what happened and try to improve the way in which we deal with talented, intelligent players of his ilk.  

     

    I agree. I don't want to waste another 9 years on the next great white hope.

     

    • Haha 1

    6 hours ago, jnrmac said:

    Best return from Jack in a real game? 4 goals

    You'd be the kind of person still waiting for Col Sylvia to have a good pre-season.....

    4 goals is a decent return from a second forward who can pinch hit in the ruck. Cameron Pedersen’s best is 3 for example. I think he would’ve been handy backup for Tmac and Cam at the very least. I’ve made my point, we’ll see how it goes. I hope it was the right call.

    As for Sylvia I had no qualms with him leaving and was wrapped to get Bernie for him at the time. 

    You’re clearly the type of person who plays the man not the ball.

    1 hour ago, deejammin' said:

    4 goals is a decent return from a second forward who can pinch hit in the ruck. Cameron Pedersen’s best is 3 for example. I think he would’ve been handy backup for Tmac and Cam at the very least. I’ve made my point, we’ll see how it goes. I hope it was the right call.

    As for Sylvia I had no qualms with him leaving and was wrapped to get Bernie for him at the time. 

    You’re clearly the type of person who plays the man not the ball.

    Tom McDonald kick 5 goals in a game last year having trained as a defender for years.

    Sam Blease kicked 5 in a game.

    I couldn't care if he kicks 10 and wins their B&F.  The MFC outgrew Watts.

    • Like 4

    Surely even the ‘Keep Watts Camp’ would take Lever over Watts. We weren’t getting Lever if we kept Watts.

    • Like 1
    17 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

    Surely even the ‘Keep Watts Camp’ would take Lever over Watts. We weren’t getting Lever if we kept Watts.

    Therein is the truth of the matter ET.  We couldn't have both, so Watts had to go - the rest is window dressing!

    43 minutes ago, ProDee said:

    Tom McDonald kick 5 goals in a game last year having trained as a defender for years.

    Sam Blease kicked 5 in a game.

    I couldn't care if he kicks 10 and wins their B&F.  The MFC outgrew Watts.

    With all due respect, I’ve heard your opinion, you’ve heard mine.

    MFC chose to get rid of Watts, we both support them and hope it was the right decision. We’ll see what happens with the season ahead.

    For what it’s worth though if you don’t care what Watts does/has done you had decided you just wanted him gone then I’m not sure you’re in a position to judge objectively whether it was the right move or not. I’ll happily stop posting on this now, there’s many other exciting things for us to talk about, hopefully even agree on.

    • Like 1

    47 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

    Surely even the ‘Keep Watts Camp’ would take Lever over Watts. We weren’t getting Lever if we kept Watts.

    There’s no truth to this. Mahoney said as much during trade week,  we could have easily paid both salaries and kept both. We’re still paying a proportion of Watts’ salary on top of paying Fritsch a base listed player salary. There’s is a small amount saved but not enough to be the difference between getting Lever and not. Ask anyone from the club, it is categorically not true.

    Stunned the club didn’t publicly state they were trading Watts to being in Lever..

    Edited by Ethan Tremblay

    • Haha 1

    Paul Connors was positioning his client the best way he could after MFC publicly trashed Watt’s reputation during trade period. If this was the reason the club would’ve used it to appease fans like me. They didn’t, because it’s not true. Go to a members function and ask any of the list management team, they will openly tell you as much. The reasons ProDee has stated are the reasons he was let go, Lever has nothing to do with it.

     
    4 minutes ago, deejammin' said:

    Paul Connors was positioning his client the best way he could after MFC publicly trashed Watt’s reputation during trade period. If this was the reason the club would’ve used it to appease fans like me. They didn’t, because it’s not true. Go to a members function and ask any of the list management team, they will openly tell you as much. The reasons ProDee has stated are the reasons he was let go, Lever has nothing to do with it.

    He did have something to do with it, even if it was indirectly.

    Getting Lever on a large contract meant that something had to give - we still have a number of players to sign and the salary cap will probably be tight.  We obviously wanted to move Watts on, but in doing so it freed up some of the cap room that we gave up to sign Lever.  It will no doubt help in our quest to re-sign all the young players going forward, even if it's just in the short term.

    Keeping both Lever and Watts wasn't an option, so Lever played a role, even if it was small, in helping to move Watts to Port Adelaide.


    Guest
    This topic is now closed to further replies.
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Essendon

      As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Essendon

      Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

        • Thanks
      • 475 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 05

      Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Thanks
      • 123 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Geelong

      There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Geelong

      I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 04

      Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

        • Thanks
      • 273 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All