Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author

That’s definently a rip-off. Ugh, why would we want to rip off a soccer logo. Yuck

 

Whilst I like the crazy eyes from the 80s, I really like the current design, I’m embracing it!

1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

608370C7-AFCA-4721-BE03-55225595BB8F.jpeg.950bc96ef5ec2d5cc62acec5a1ac5123.jpeg

As a Toffee I despise the one on the left. Don't mind Schwabbys logo. Although I actually just like the MFC monogram

 
1 hour ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

608370C7-AFCA-4721-BE03-55225595BB8F.jpeg.950bc96ef5ec2d5cc62acec5a1ac5123.jpeg

Those time-travelling Liverpudlian bastards copied us?


2 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Stuie designed a good logo a few years ago. 

 

unnamed.png

  • Author

Lol I hate soccer. So, although I liked it at the time, I agree it had to go. Even if the soccer club did approve it.

I still don’t think our “retro” gear should be restricted to 1988 though.

 
34 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Best by far.....

images (6).jpeg

Not even close. @praha should have been put on staff at the club for this effort.

ornqe9.jpg

 

 


I love our current logo, and hope we keep it forever and a day,

 

But,

 

I love this fan made logo, I think its from someone on bigfooty

 

 

MelbourneRD.png

 Best logo ever got to tell the late great Jim Stynes the major reason im a demon to this day he loved it the big fella.

Melbourne-logo-1977.gif

7 hours ago, General Malaise said:

Serious? Absolutely no resemblance. Other than a shield.

The symbols Catalan flag/Aussie Strars, Cross of St George (which is symbol of the city of Barcelona)/Trident, Soccer Ball/Footy etc, besides which I asked Schwab straight out and he said yes


  • Author
9 hours ago, Win4theAges said:

 Best logo ever got to tell the late great Jim Stynes the major reason im a demon to this day he loved it the big fella.

Melbourne-logo-1977.gif

Love him, but can’t we have the 1989 logo on retro as well?

15 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

608370C7-AFCA-4721-BE03-55225595BB8F.jpeg.950bc96ef5ec2d5cc62acec5a1ac5123.jpeg

Bloody newcomers. They come along 34 years later and claim we copy them, bah!

20 minutes ago, mauriesy said:

Schwab's might have been better without the trident and southern cross.

Melbourne-logo-2011.gif.5a00c3f680d9ed9d3ba27fbfcacf68da.gif

I always thought it would look much better with the Southern across and Trident, nice work. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

9 hours ago, Satyriconhome said:

The symbols Catalan flag/Aussie Strars, Cross of St George (which is symbol of the city of Barcelona)/Trident, Soccer Ball/Footy etc, besides which I asked Schwab straight out and he said yes

So it's a rip-off of both Liverpool AND Barca, even though they each look nothing like each other?

Similar elements (as admitted by CS) in a totally different design doesn't make it plagiarism. I don't believe ours could remotely be mistaken for theirs.

Heraldic Tradition I say.

img.jpg.2270488974a89fb31c1f259a48370484.jpg

 

Meanwhile the Marylebone Cricket Club called. They want their monogram back.

MCC_logo_svg.thumb.png.9ae57dc6997e5428edd94aba0348d9ab.png

Edited by General Malaise


  • Author

Uh can this stop turning into a soccer topic?

2 hours ago, mauriesy said:

Schwab's might have been better without the trident and southern cross.

Melbourne-logo-2011.gif.5a00c3f680d9ed9d3ba27fbfcacf68da.gif

Spot on.  The Schwabby one always looks like it was designed by a committee and everyone’s ideas needed to be included.  It was cluttered and haphazard.

FWIW I think our current monogram is great.  It’s simple, effective, stands out and is timeless.

30 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

FWIW I think our current monogram is great.  It’s simple, effective, stands out and is timeless.

That was the idea after the cluttered design, we were lucky we didn't get Schwab's original design, that was more cluttered

I was part of a focis group invited to input on what design we would like to see

 
4 hours ago, Cassiew said:

Love him, but can’t we have the 1989 logo on retro as well?

Never said it had to be Cassy, all i said is that it is my favourite.

2 hours ago, Satyriconhome said:

Schwab's original design, that was more cluttered

What else was squeezed on there?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 587 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies