Jump to content

Dangerfield - A true off-field intelligent unique AFL role model

Featured Replies

Posted

This guy has his head screwed on and feet firmly planted on the ground.  

The way he departed Adelaide was all class; leaving Judd, Ablett and to a lesser extent, the young pressured Scully in his wake.  Didn't lie.  Didn't ask clubs to present to him when his mind was made up.  Just didn't treat the fan like a moron.  Judd thinks he has a PhD on life, so difficult for Judy not to treat anyone like a moron actually.  Paddy could have got 1.5k a year, but prioritised family, heart and team success to accept 60% of his worth.

Danger's comments that supported the trans-gender community, squarely aimed at Newman and the carcass that is the Footy Show, was so accurate, that it flustered the unusually unflappable Newman.

 

Dangerfield' view of footballers walking media street and separating it from onfield events is so refreshing and un-Paganesque in an era of the media and fans investing in their (players) huge and well-deserved rewards.

 

He is so unlike the SEN simpleton.  He thinks with clarity and courage.  He gets a seat at my hypothetical last supper, with PJK, Roosy, Wallet, Julia Eileen, Ben Lexcen, Bevo, Rossy Lyon, Bruce McAvaney, BT (MC), Springsteen, Turnbull, Elvis, Lennon, and JFK.

The guy with the PhD and his trophy superficial wife can get take away.  (I withdraw this last line as I do not know them personally, and just went on the basis of a potentially flawed but usually correct perception)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TGR dips his lid.

Edited by TGR
Caulfield Grammar

 

I watched Dangerfield on Talking Footy the other night: smart, articulate bloke and far, far better than the other panelists. 

Also very well regarded by people in Geelong

 

Had similar thoughts after Dangerfield's calm, measured response to Newman's daft little posturing.

Footballer of the past, meet footballer of the future.

Can't help wondering what Dangerfield will do after football. Or maybe he'll just surf and raise chooks in a nice home with a view of the sea.

1 hour ago, Dee Dee said:

I watched Dangerfield on Talking Footy the other night: smart, articulate bloke and far, far better than the other panelists. 

Also very well regarded by people in Geelong

I thought he sooked it up big time when they laughed at his buddy would kick 2000 goals statement. 

But overall I agree that he is pretty good.


Wow i must be the only one who thinks Danger is an absolute [censored] of the highest order. Loves bathing in his own water and whats worse is we'll have to hear him more after he retires because he is the channel 7 golden child along with Hamish, Darcy and BT.

Has too much to say in the media and needs to focus on playing and keeping his mouth shut.

Has plackards on his self.

I agree with you DDavey, Danger is very bright and knows his football but I would suggest he not engage in non-football issues.

Why should Sam apologise? Political Correctness will destroy this country .

Bruce Jenner was a man who competed in the Olympics, was married and had children and now is now a fully functioning women. I'm confused to what he or she is meant to be.

 

 

Not sure how I feel about him. Strikes me as the sort of bloke who has to tell everyone his opinion. I was confused as to why he needed to get involved on the Fasolo issue so early. Seemed opportunistic to me.

Dangerfield likes his own work a little too much for me.

I'd prefer to listen to Maxy. He doesn't seem to be trying to posture for a long term media role, he has a laugh at his own expense, and he seems passionate about life in a way you can't fake. How good was it at half time last week when he turned to Peter Bell and said 'wouldn't mind you roving to me'? 

I like Bob Murphy for the same reasons I like Max. Enthusiasm is infectious, and an ability to see the game as part of something simultaneously much bigger, and smaller, than life.

 


Quote

He is so unlike the SEN simpleton.

Ah yes, the "Holier than thou, Do as I say, Not as I do" intellectual elitism of modern day insults.

  • Author
6 minutes ago, Jibroni said:

I agree with you DDavey, Danger is very bright and knows his football but I would suggest he not engage in non-football issues.

Why should Sam apologise? Political Correctness will destroy this country .

Bruce Jenner was a man who competed in the Olympics, was married and had children and now is now a fully functioning women. I'm confused to what he or she is meant to be.

 

I think you are just confused

Love to know Bernie's thoughts :rolleyes:

4 minutes ago, Jibroni said:

I agree with you DDavey, Danger is very bright and knows his football but I would suggest he not engage in non-football issues.

Why should Sam apologise? Political Correctness will destroy this country .

Bruce Jenner was a man who competed in the Olympics, was married and had children and now is now a fully functioning women. I'm confused to what he or she is meant to be.

 

huh?

It's not hard. Was a guy, is now a girl.

He is now she.

This is not confusing in the slightest.

It's not like she's an owlkin listing her pronouns on Tumblr and biting off your head when you don't know to use 'phe' or something.

Having a go at a media personality who can't make a simple change like swapping a pronoun is valid in my book.

Just because you can't deal with something so simple doesn't mean others can't, or that the 'political correctness' boogeyman is to blame and will lead to the downfall of society.

  • Author
6 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

Dangerfield likes his own work a little too much for me.

I'd prefer to listen to Maxy. He doesn't seem to be trying to posture for a long term media role, he has a laugh at his own expense, and he seems passionate about life in a way you can't fake. How good was it at half time last week when he turned to Peter Bell and said 'wouldn't mind you roving to me'? 

I like Bob Murphy for the same reasons I like Max. Enthusiasm is infectious, and an ability to see the game as part of something simultaneously much bigger, and smaller, than life.

 

Bob Murphy is on a par with Danger.  Both grounded but more spiritual and deep is Bob.

 

Was Brendan McCartney's greatest mistake the fact that Ryan Griffen was appointed captain and not a slightly younger Bob Murphy???  Or was it the way he treated the Stevens family, and Kobe in particular, leading up to his milestone game?

 


1 minute ago, TGR said:

Bob Murphy is on a par with Danger.  Both grounded but more spiritual and deep is Bob.

 

Was Brendan McCartney's greatest mistake the fact that Ryan Griffen was appointed captain and not a slightly younger Bob Murphy???  Or was it the way he treated the Stevens family, and Kobe in particular, leading up to his milestone game?

 

Honestly TGR, who gives a [censored]

Its game day. Go dees.

5 minutes ago, Choke said:

huh?

It's not hard. Was a guy, is now a girl.

He is now she.

This is not confusing in the slightest.

It's not like she's an owlkin listing her pronouns on Tumblr and biting off your head when you don't know to use 'phe' or something.

Having a go at a media personality who can't make a simple change like swapping a pronoun is valid in my book.

Just because you can't deal with something so simple doesn't mean others can't, or that the 'political correctness' boogeyman is to blame and will lead to the downfall of society.

So which part of what Newman's comments about Jenner did you find offensive? I dont understand the backlash against him, hence my comment re: Political Correctness.

PS: I think Newman is a [censored] most of the time.

Just now, Jibroni said:

So which part of what Newman's comments about Jenner did you find offensive? I dont understand the backlash against him, hence my comment re: Political Correctness.

PS: I think Newman is a [censored] most of the time.

I didn't say I found Newman offensive.

I said it's valid to have a go at him because he couldn't work out a simple pronoun change.

IIRC Newman referred to her at "it". This is unacceptable.

 

Agreed, Newman is a tool.

1 hour ago, Choke said:

huh?

It's not hard. Was a guy, is now a girl.

He is now she.

This is not confusing in the slightest.

It's not like she's an owlkin listing her pronouns on Tumblr and biting off your head when you don't know to use 'phe' or something.

Having a go at a media personality who can't make a simple change like swapping a pronoun is valid in my book.

Just because you can't deal with something so simple doesn't mean others can't, or that the 'political correctness' boogeyman is to blame and will lead to the downfall of society.

So, you are endorsing that, for the educated, it is fair game to "have a go at" those that are uneducated?

9 minutes ago, The Chazz said:

So, you are endorsing that, for the educated, it is fair game to "have a go at" those that are uneducated?

If the uneducated holds a media position, absolutely.


1 minute ago, Choke said:

If the uneducated holds a media position, absolutely.

Unfortunately Choke, Newman is not uneducated, he is just paid a ridiculous amount of money to be a boorish oaf

Danger is a great player and an articulate person.  But he doesn't have a lot of cred with me.

Adelaide picked him up at pick 10, left him in school for a year for no benefit, put a lot of IP and footy smarts into him, developed him beautifully and then, I believe in the year Walsh was murdered, walked out on the club when they desperately needed him.

Homesick?  Give me a break.  Geelong is 90 minutes away, he gets multiple weeks holiday a year to be with family, he would have been as financially successful at Adelaide and perhaps equally or more successful in his playing career if he'd stayed.  There are literally tens of thousands of people in many walks of life that move from home to pursue a career and make sacrifices to achieve success.  But Danger was too precious.  Ran out on a club that had invested big time and done absolutely everything right by him.  But he was a little homesick so walked out on those that played a big part in making him what he is.

He like Judd is smart.  The media won't take him on.  Love watching him, respect him as a footballer but not a person.

 

 

Really? A thread wasted on an opposition player on a huge day in our recent history. Who cares anyway? Good bloke,ordinary bloke. Just like the repetitive Jordan Lewis thread. Complete non issue.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 85 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 20 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 21 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Like
    • 292 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Carlton

    It's Game Day and Clarry's 200th game and for anyone who hates Carlton as much as I do this is our Grand Final. Go Dees.

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 669 replies
  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies