Jump to content

Featured Replies

This is the list managements last chance to do a good/bargain deal for us. Can we please try to not give something too high for him. 

 
7 minutes ago, Pates said:

This is the list managements last chance to do a good/bargain deal for us. Can we please try to not give something too high for him. 

Wishful thinking perhaps, Pates.

An angry supporter called SEN and said Mahoney's negotiation is just like the team this year:  In a great position to win and expected to get a win, then cave in and lose.  Referring to the Lever and Watts trade.  

I thought the caller made a very good point.  We, as a club do not know how to convert a winning position.  Like you I hope that changes with Balic, even for symbolic reasons - people are laughing at MFC especially over the Watts gift to Port.

We have: 29, 31, 36, 47 and 66. 

They have: 41, 42, 57, 60 and 79.

I doubt we will use 66 even if Garland retires. We are better off having a look at delisted free agents, the preseason draft or an extra rookie and then having flexibility to promote one of them.

66 I'd suggest is on the table but the Dockers will want more. So we can do 47 down to 57 or 36 down to 42 or similar but ideally it comes with a 3rd party who might be keen on taking on later picks to move one our picks up the order.

 
21 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Wishful thinking perhaps, Pates.

An angry supporter called SEN and said Mahoney's negotiation is just like the team this year:  In a great position to win and expected to get a win, then cave in and lose.  Referring to the Lever and Watts trade.  

I thought the caller made a very good point.  We, as a club do not know how to convert a winning position.  Like you I hope that changes with Balic, even for symbolic reasons - people are laughing at MFC especially over the Watts gift to Port.

Making parallels between negotiating at the trade table and form onfield is beyond silly.

Balic for Pick 47 will be fine by me.

We take 3 second rounders into the draft while also adding Lever and Balic.  Not that bad if you ask me.


10 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

We have: 29, 31, 36, 47 and 66. 

They have: 41, 42, 57, 60 and 79.

I doubt we will use 66 even if Garland retires. We are better off having a look at delisted free agents, the preseason draft or an extra rookie and then having flexibility to promote one of them.

66 I'd suggest is on the table but the Dockers will want more. So we can do 47 down to 57 or 36 down to 42 or similar but ideally it comes with a 3rd party who might be keen on taking on later picks to move one our picks up the order.

Mahoney will prob give pic 29 for Balic and say it’s a fair deal for both clubs. 

Sound familar?????

 
16 minutes ago, DemonOX said:

Mahoney will prob give pic 29 for Balic and say it’s a fair deal for both clubs. 

Sound familar?????

Take your butt hurt to the JW thread

1 minute ago, Unleash Hell said:

Take your butt hurt to the JW thread

Don’t worry I’ve already been there. 


Just now, DemonOX said:

Don’t worry I’ve already been there. 

Haha fair enough mate, not meaning to be rude just for some of us life goes on.

Just now, Unleash Hell said:

Haha fair enough mate, not meaning to be rude just for some of us life goes on.

Don’t worry I know life goes on but it would be nice to come out on top for a change. 

1 minute ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Make Him The New Whipping Boy

Bit rough on the young fella.... hahaha I assumed O Mac would take the mantle now?

1 minute ago, DemonOX said:

Don’t worry I know life goes on but it would be nice to come out on top for a change. 

Agreed.  It would have been nice to have a fairy tale but footy is full of sad endings unfortunately. Jack won't be the last


1 hour ago, DemonOX said:

Don’t worry I know life goes on but it would be nice to come out on top for a change. 

Does Hibberd ring a bell?

19 minutes ago, Leoncelli_36 said:

http://m.afl.com.au/news/2017-10-17/docker-one-step-from-becoming-a-demon

 

So according to his manager, mfc were waiting to see what they got for watts before moving on Balic...the recent form suggests we will probably give up pick 31 for a former pick 38. That's our current track record isn't it? 

Bain (ballics manager) said it would be a late pick.

But good humor lots of laughs

1 minute ago, Unleash Hell said:

Bain (ballics manager) said it would be a late pick.

But good humor lots of laughs

31 a late pick yeah? Or is 31 a top end pick? We've been bent over in every deal this year and a few last year..may the trend continue

2 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

We have: 29, 31, 36, 47 and 66. 

Great! Quick Mahoney, it's not too late to give all 5 picks to Fremantle for Balic.


47 minutes ago, Leoncelli_36 said:

31 a late pick yeah? Or is 31 a top end pick? We've been bent over in every deal this year and a few last year..may the trend continue

An opinion.  A wrong one, but an opinion all the same.

We did alright with Hibberd last year as well, but don't let the facts get in the way of a fictional story.

36 minutes ago, Leoncelli_36 said:

I would give 66...this bloke has some major off field issues..not sure we all understand the baggage we are taking on here. 

It's already been reported in Real Footy that the trade will happen tomorrow and that we will be giving pick 66 for him... as mentioned above by another poster.

His off-field issues related to anxiety caused by being away from his extremely close family... apparently his mother was quite distraught that he went to the west and his father had, jokingly, offered him $70,000 to stay home. But of course that probably doesn't fit the doom and gloom narrative that is ever popular amongst many posters on this site.

2 minutes ago, hardtack said:

It's already been reported in Real Footy that the trade will happen tomorrow and that we will be giving pick 66 for him... as mentioned above by another poster.

His off-field issues related to anxiety caused by being away from his extremely close family... apparently his mother was quite distraught that he went to the west and his father had, jokingly, offered him $70,000 to stay home. But of course that probably doesn't fit the doom and gloom narrative that is ever popular amongst many posters on this site.

Pick 66 would be a bargin and well worth it. Maybe use pick 29 and 31 and swap for a early 2nd rounder or late 1st rounder.

 
1 minute ago, Dirts said:

Pick 66 would be a bargin and well worth it. Maybe use pick 29 and 31 and swap for a early 2nd rounder or late 1st rounder.

Yes, it goes some way to making up for the Watts trade and leaves us with 29, 31 and 38(?) and is it one other pick in the 80's? Not sure what they'll do next as they might need all available picks to top up the list in the event that Garland does announce his retirement.

Jeezus! Wish my dad offered me $70k to not take a job. WTF didn't he give the money anyway? Is parental love conditional? Strange cat.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Clap
    • 30 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 145 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 36 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 529 replies