Jump to content

Featured Replies

4 minutes ago, Red and Blue realist said:

I thought this before the weekend, and given our set up this has confirmed it more so for me, but May while a very good player, is more a stand next to a gorilla and nullify them, rather than fit into a zone and be able to play on bigs and smalls. He is a very good full back, but I don't necessarily see him as also potentially a CHB or 3rd tall. Given we're very much into the zone structure we need guys with a bit more flexibility, Frost, TMac and even OMac can play all of FB, CHB and 3rd tall. 

I still think Trengove from Port might be a better fit to the way we play, plus as a free agent won't cost us as much in what we have to give up. Might be the same $ but no draft picks or loss of players.  

May looked very quick and is a decent kick with a good grab. He and TMac would be a strong combo against talls, and both have very good pace.

 
Just now, Bay Riffin said:

May looked very quick and is a decent kick with a good grab. He and TMac would be a strong combo against talls, and both have very good pace.

Don't get me wrong, I think he's a very high quality player in particular in his primary role. However, I think with the way we play he'd be asked to be part of the zone more often than not, and he got caught out a couple of times having to double back or zone off (as someone mentioned earlier he got done over by Garlett). So I think he might not work fully with our game plan. Plus the cost would be high - both $ and acquisition (draft picks/players).  

Hibberd      T.McDonald        Hunt

  Jetta              May              Frost

 

A back-line like above has a lot of pace, flexibility and hardness. The positive thing is that we have 5/6 positions filled already. May might not be the player we are targeting, but it is clear that we lack another quality KPD. 

Edited by Demon Disciple

 

I preferred their player Jack Leslie, if he was available, or gettable. Probably on a lot less than May so an offer of around 500 a season would be a good deal for us I reckon.

3 hours ago, Members' Wing said:

Brett Anderson who's got pretty good sources and is a huge Dees man has been saying for the past few weeks that we're having huge cracks at both May and Lever. 

Fair enough.  I have no doubt we will be asking the questions, but it feels like we're on the periphery at the moment.

3 hours ago, stevethemanjordan said:

 

Nobody knows anything, I'm not sure why you've drawn a conclusion from the fact you haven't officially heard that we're targeting May.

 

I know everything.

Seriously though Steve, I've drawn that conclusion from what I've heard this year.  What else can I do?  I'm sure we are doing our due diligence but, at the moment, it seems we're on the periphery and if Steven May does decide to leave then the Hawks are in the box seat.  Doesn't mean we're out of it, but I just don't think we will see Steven May in the red and blue next season.  I'd love it if he was, though.


51 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

Seriously though Steve, I've drawn that conclusion from what I've heard this year.  What else can I do?  I'm sure we are doing our due diligence but, at the moment, it seems we're on the periphery and if Steven May does decide to leave then the Hawks are in the box seat.  Doesn't mean we're out of it, but I just don't think we will see Steven May in the red and blue next season.  I'd love it if he was, though.

Don't doubt you Wise, but what can the Hawks give? May is not a Free Agent, and they gave up their first rounder for this year in last year's trade period. That only leaves them with next year's first rounder. Sure they still have some decent players' but last year showed that none of these players' want to leave.

Just now, Demon Disciple said:

Don't doubt you Wise, but what can the Hawks give? May is not a Free Agent, and they gave up their first rounder for this year in last year's trade period. That only leaves them with next year's first rounder. Sure they still have some decent players' but last year showed that none of these players' want to leave.

That's true, DD.  I often forget that aspect when it comes to the Hawks and they've kind of shot themselves in the foot a little.  If they go full rebuild they are already missing picks, but if they try and top up their list they don't have the means to do it without sacrificing a good player in the process.

They have players on the list who would have currency, but they won't want to give them up.  If May wants to get there then the Hawks may need to pull off an absolute miracle to get it done, but if anyone can do it then it's the Hawks.

4 hours ago, deespicable me said:

I preferred their player Jack Leslie, if he was available, or gettable. Probably on a lot less than May so an offer of around 500 a season would be a good deal for us I reckon.

Ahhh - I see you've fallen for the player that is a spud against every other team, but played alright against Melbourne once in their career.  See Tim O'Brien.

 
1 hour ago, Demon Disciple said:

Don't doubt you Wise, but what can the Hawks give? May is not a Free Agent, and they gave up their first rounder for this year in last year's trade period. That only leaves them with next year's first rounder. Sure they still have some decent players' but last year showed that none of these players' want to leave.

Giving up what may be pick 1 or 2 for May seems a bit steep.

6 minutes ago, TRIGON said:

Giving up what may be pick 1 or 2 for May seems a bit steep.

They don't have pick 1 or 2 


2 hours ago, Wiseblood said:

Fair enough.  I have no doubt we will be asking the questions, but it feels like we're on the periphery at the moment.

I know everything.

Seriously though Steve, I've drawn that conclusion from what I've heard this year.  What else can I do?  I'm sure we are doing our due diligence but, at the moment, it seems we're on the periphery and if Steven May does decide to leave then the Hawks are in the box seat.  Doesn't mean we're out of it, but I just don't think we will see Steven May in the red and blue next season.  I'd love it if he was, though.

Is May a FA? If he's not not sure how the Hawks can get the deal done.

Edit - never mind just saw subsequent posts

Edited by Dr. Gonzo

9 hours ago, Demons11 said:

They don't have pick 1 or 2 

2018...and it was tongue in cheek 

Steven May is to short. What we do not need at Melbourne is another 193cm key position player. We need 200+cm. 

14 minutes ago, hank said:

Steven May is to short. What we do not need at Melbourne is another 193cm key position player. We need 200+cm. 

a Fitzpatrick type?

7 minutes ago, 3Dee said:

a Fitzpatrick type?

He would've been handy to help as a ruck in the absence of Gawn and Spencer

Just sayin'...


The other advantage of Trengove (over May) is his flexibility whereby he can play in the ruck and also pinch-hit up forward as required.

I'm definitely warming to getting him as a free agent and holding onto our first round pick rather than giving anything up for May / Lever, as much as I love Lever.

You'd expect they'd all be on similar $$ but getting Trengove would cost us nada in terms of giving anything up (other than the cap space) to get him in.

How about we get Goody, Hibberd and Melk to do some serious recruiting and get in Michael Hurleys ear.

Talk about the perfect player to top off our potential premiership list.  Problem is it would cost us something like our 1st rounder + Angus Brayshaw.

1 minute ago, Petraccattack said:

How about we get Goody, Hibberd and Melk to do some serious recruiting and get in Michael Hurleys ear.

Talk about the perfect player to top off our potential premiership list.  Problem is it would cost us something like our 1st rounder + Angus Brayshaw.

Done in a heartbeat.

17 minutes ago, 3Dee said:

a Fitzpatrick type?

Fitzpatrick was not a KPP he was a ruckman / forward and not to good at either. 

15 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

He would've been handy to help as a ruck in the absence of Gawn and Spencer

Just sayin'...

No he wouldn't. Pedersen playing as an old fashioned follower is more effective than having Fitzpatrick on the field.


33 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

How about we get Goody, Hibberd and Melk to do some serious recruiting and get in Michael Hurleys ear.

Talk about the perfect player to top off our potential premiership list.  Problem is it would cost us something like our 1st rounder + Angus Brayshaw.

He just re-signed last year, I think we had a fair crack and he decided to stay. Plus dealing with Essendon would cost at least our first this year and next, Brayshaw, Tracc, Oliver, Gawn, Hogan and Viney. 

11 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Is May a FA? If he's not not sure how the Hawks can get the deal done.

Edit - never mind just saw subsequent posts

It would be hard for the hawks but may I say how incredibly terrible for the league and a vomit in the mouth moment if Hawthron after acquiring Lake from the struggling Doggies, then acquiring Frawley for the struggling Dees (and acquiring premierships because of it), then just go and get a third key back in May.

How sickening that would be, if its not already showing how free agency is the catasptrophic flaw in evening up the competition.

Seriously Hawthorn have no objective to develop through the draft, to develop Hawthorn players. just pillage other teams lists and the AFL rules are to blame. and its sickening to watch.

 

38 minutes ago, hank said:

Fitzpatrick was not a KPP he was a ruckman / forward and not to good at either. 

I can recall him playing somewhat of a breakout game against the Hawks as a defender, maybe that's why they picked him up?

Point being 200cm+ don't really exist.

 
1 hour ago, hank said:

Steven May is to short. What we do not need at Melbourne is another 193cm key position player. We need 200+cm. 

It's about the quality of player you are. If you're a high quality defender, you're going to know how to combat 7+ cm in height. 

May and Hurley are both 193 cm but are better than any defender we have. They use their bodies, strength and timing to outmanoeuvre taller opponents. 

The height issue is overtalked. 

Of course, if there is little pressure on the ball carrier coming in and the kick is too good, no defender will be able to stop that. 

There are no elite defenders in the league that stand at 200cm. 

Edited by stevethemanjordan

5 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

It's about the quality of player you are. If you're a high quality defender, you're going to know how to combat 7+ cm in height. 

May and Hurley are both 193 cm but are better than any defender we have. They use their bodies, strength and timing to outmanoeuvre taller opponents. 

The height issue is overtalked. 

Of course, if there is little pressure on the ball carrier coming in and the kick is too good, no defender will be able to stop that. 

There are no elite defenders in the league that stand at 200cm. 

The irony is that posters keep saying they want May because he is a bigger type of defender than the ones we have. He's not.

Personally I don't think recruiting May would solve many problems. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies