Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

THE BOMBERS' SWISS ADVENTURE

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, monoccular said:

An absolutely gutless cop out by an organization full of pomp and ceremony with no substance (sounds like a well known wannabe head of the UN)  

Won't be watching even before this cop out 

Well that makes three of us mono.

 
18 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Wow. I like the way you've jumped from Robbo "intimating" that the Bombers tanked to accepting it as fact. 

 

he followed it up with an article in the hun today. pretty strong intimation too. The article was titled "that's a bit rich" but i can't find it online 

 

 

btw.......must be close to getting a decision on essendrugs appeal in switzerland. anyone heard anything?

 
6 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

btw.......must be close to getting a decision on essendrugs appeal in switzerland. anyone heard anything?

No idea dc but they may have been a little busy lately.

I heard there was a small story about Russia.

1 hour ago, old dee said:

No idea dc but they may have been a little busy lately.

I heard there was a small story about Russia.

Well that's just so unfair for the powers that be to focus on real foreign drug cheats rather than our true-blue Aussie victims. I think Essendon should have the lawyers draft up a request to drop this whole thing seeing as how long it's dragging on and, for God's sake haven't these boys suffered enough. I mean who knows how much damage is being done to their bodies, liver in particular, during this year of punishment.


1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

he followed it up with an article in the hun today. pretty strong intimation too. The article was titled "that's a bit rich" but i can't find it online 

 

 

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/not-tagging-daniel-rich-was-either-poor-coaching-unlucky-coaching-or-selfsabotage-says-mark-robinson/news-story/3d607be2e2984737a1e8a7dec9793334

and use the usual ruse to get around the paywall (more like a payswisscheese)

1 hour ago, old dee said:

No idea dc but they may have been a little busy lately.

I heard there was a small story about Russia.

and probably a shortage of cash too, od

some wag in the letters section of the paper pointed out that the last time essendrug won the wooden spoon  was when hitler came to power in 1933, and now approach their next wooden spoon just as trump is likely to gain power

an omen? or just another case of godwin's law?

Edited by daisycutter

 
4 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Wow. I like the way you've jumped from Robbo "intimating" that the Bombers tanked to accepting it as fact. 

 

You think they didn't ? 

37 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

You think they didn't ? 

I didn't see the game. But here's no logical reason for them to tank. The evidence of many years drafting shows that there is no significant difference in the likely success of two players picked successively, whether it's with picks 1 and 2 or picks 41 and 42.  


Just now, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I didn't see the game. But here's no logical reason for them to tank. The evidence of many years drafting shows that there is no significant difference in the likely success of two players picked successively, whether it's with picks 1 and 2 or picks 41 and 42.  

But there's a BIG difference is positive press AND it also means they get first pick in the PSD in case someone ( they may already have planned for)  conveniently drops into that category. 

8 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I didn't see the game. But here's no logical reason for them to tank. The evidence of many years drafting shows that there is no significant difference in the likely success of two players picked successively, whether it's with picks 1 and 2 or picks 41 and 42.  

They left Daniel Rich untagged Trapper Style .They stanked !!

Like in the last quarter of the game. Let's get close but not that close...

5 minutes ago, Wells 11 said:

But there's a BIG difference is positive press AND it also means they get first pick in the PSD in case someone ( they may already have planned for)  conveniently drops into that category. 

I know a few Essendon supporters. Their view is that any "positive press" from having the number 1 pick is offset and more by the negativity of receiving the wooden spoon (without any additional opprobrium from being accused of tanking to get there). As far as having planned for a player, I'm sure they've planned for more than one player and will be happy with whoever they choose whether its at pick #1 or #2.

6 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I know a few Essendon supporters. Their view is that any "positive press" from having the number 1 pick is offset and more by the negativity of receiving the wooden spoon (without any additional opprobrium from being accused of tanking to get there). As far as having planned for a player, I'm sure they've planned for more than one player and will be happy with whoever they choose whether its at pick #1 or #2.

End the "season from hell" get all their players back, turn a new leaf, get the number one draft pick. Lets see come draft day what feels more important the spoon or the excitement. 


I don't think that it is true that EFC or any club doesn't care whether they get pick 1 or 2 despite the fact that #2 can often turn out to be a better player.  If a club is desperately in need of a full forward and the two standouts in the draft are a mid and a full forward,  they'd care.

1 hour ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I didn't see the game. But here's no logical reason for them to tank. The evidence of many years drafting shows that there is no significant difference in the likely success of two players picked successively, whether it's with picks 1 and 2 or picks 41 and 42.  

 

1 hour ago, Wells 11 said:

But there's a BIG difference is positive press AND it also means they get first pick in the PSD in case someone ( they may already have planned for)  conveniently drops into that category. 

 

1 hour ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I know a few Essendon supporters. Their view is that any "positive press" from having the number 1 pick is offset and more by the negativity of receiving the wooden spoon (without any additional opprobrium from being accused of tanking to get there). As far as having planned for a player, I'm sure they've planned for more than one player and will be happy with whoever they choose whether its at pick #1 or #2.

As 'Wells 11' says, the big advantage is in the PSD where if they have identified someone they can get them to walk to that draft and pick them up for nothing.

Lets say the worlds greatest footballer was out of contract and wanted to go to EFC, he could put himself into the PSD and EFC could pick him up for nix. At worst it would give them a pretty decent bargaining chip to work with and screw the other club over with.

2 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I know a few Essendon supporters. Their view is that any "positive press" from having the number 1 pick is offset and more by the negativity of receiving the wooden spoon (without any additional opprobrium from being accused of tanking to get there). As far as having planned for a player, I'm sure they've planned for more than one player and will be happy with whoever they choose whether its at pick #1 or #2.

They will swap pick 1 for 2 top 10 picks or a player and top pick like our Tyson deal. Then they convince a player to go in PSD and get him for nothing. 

Oh hell yeah they tanked. 

 

Edited by Redleg

2 minutes ago, Redleg said:

They will swap pick 1 for 2 top 10 picks or a player and top pick like our Tyson deal. Then they convince a player to go in PSD and get him for nothing. 

Oh hell yeah they ranked.

They have the gall to ask a player to walk to them in the PSD but won't let their WADA suspended players walk to other clubs as DFA's. 

Their double standards and hypocrisy is astounding. 

No matter how well they play in future that will always be a morally corrupt club.

3 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

They have the gall to ask a player to walk to them in the PSD but won't let their WADA suspended players walk to other clubs as DFA's. 

Their double standards and hypocrisy is astounding. 

No matter how well they play in future that will always be a morally corrupt club.

Very similar to the IOC LH


44 minutes ago, rjay said:

 

 

As 'Wells 11' says, the big advantage is in the PSD where if they have identified someone they can get them to walk to that draft and pick them up for nothing.

Lets say the worlds greatest footballer was out of contract and wanted to go to EFC, he could put himself into the PSD and EFC could pick him up for nix. At worst it would give them a pretty decent bargaining chip to work with and screw the other club over with.

I admit I missed the PSD reference. But (a) how often does a really good player end up in the PSD? and (b) how come I keep reading on here that no player would want to go to the EFC...and now there seems to be the possibility that someone might, there's been a 180 degree shift in the argument. That's Robbo logic!

50 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

They have the gall to ask a player to walk to them in the PSD but won't let their WADA suspended players walk to other clubs as DFA's. 

Their double standards and hypocrisy is astounding. 

No matter how well they play in future that will always be a morally corrupt club.

You know we are discussing Essendon, probably the most difficult club in the AFL to deal with.

 
55 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I admit I missed the PSD reference. But (a) how often does a really good player end up in the PSD? and (b) how come I keep reading on here that no player would want to go to the EFC...and now there seems to be the possibility that someone might, there's been a 180 degree shift in the argument. That's Robbo logic!

I agree laughing Dee, the only compensating factor is players going to Ess are like taking Pu. You don't realise the trouble your in until it's too late.

6 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

They have the gall to ask a player to walk to them in the PSD but won't let their WADA suspended players walk to other clubs as DFA's. 

Their double standards and hypocrisy is astounding. 

No matter how well they play in future that will always be a morally corrupt club.

 

6 hours ago, old dee said:

Very similar to the IOC LH

IOC and FIFA......birds of a feather. 


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • AFLW REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Well, that was a shock. The Demons 4-game unbeaten run came to a grinding halt in a tense, scrappy affair at the sunny, windy Alberton Oval, with the Power holding on for a 2-point win. The Dees had their chances—plenty of them—but couldn't convert when it mattered most. Port’s tackling pressure rattled the Dees, triggering a fumble frenzy and surprising lack of composure from seasoned players.

    • 0 replies
  • Welcome to Demonland: Steven King

    The Melbourne Football Club has selected a new coach for the 2026 season appointing Geelong Football Club assistant coach Steven King to the head role.

      • Like
    • 957 replies
  • AFLW PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    The undefeated Demons venture across the continent to the spiritual home of the Port Adelaide Football Club on Saturday afternoon for the inaugural match for premiership points between these long-historied clubs. Alberton Oval will however, be a ground familiar to our players following a practice match there last year. We lost both the game and Liv Purcell, who missed 7 home and away matches after suffering facial fractures in the dying moments of the game.

    • 1 reply
  • AFLW REPORT: Richmond

    A glorious sunny afternoon with a typically strong Casey Fields breeze favouring the city end greeted this round four clash of the undefeated Narrm against the winless Tigers. Pre-match, the teams entered the ground through the Deearmy’s inclusive banner—"Narrm Football Weaving Communities Together and then Warumungu/Yawuru woman and Fox Boundary Rider, Megan Waters, gave the official acknowledgement of country. Any concerns that Collingwood’s strategy of last week to discombobulate the Dees would be replicated by Ryan Ferguson and his Tigers evaporated in the second quarter when Richmond failed to use the wind advantage and Narrm scored three unanswered goals. 

    • 4 replies
  • CASEY: Frankston

    The late-season run of Casey wins was broken in their first semifinal against Frankston in a heartbreaking end at Kinetic Stadium on Saturday night that in many respects reflected their entire season. When they were bad, they committed all of the football transgressions, including poor disposal, indiscipline, an inability to exert pressure, and some terrible decision-making, as exemplified by the period in the game when they conceded nine unanswered goals from early in the second quarter until halfway through the third term. You rarely win when you do this.

    • 0 replies
  • AFLW PREVIEW: Richmond

    Round four kicks off early Saturday afternoon at Casey Fields, as the mighty Narrm host the winless Richmond Tigers in the second week of Indigenous Round celebrations. With ideal footy conditions forecast—20 degrees, overcast skies, and a gentle breeze — expect a fast-paced contest. Narrm enters with momentum and a dangerous forward line, while Richmond is still searching for its first win. With key injuries on both sides and pride on the line, this clash promises plenty.

    • 3 replies

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.