Just announced in the Supreme Court that Hird's costs order, to be paid to ASADA , of about $750k, have been paid by a white knight.

They weren't a LITTLE amount.

I wonder who the white knight could be.

Hird's claim against the Insurer has now been halved.

PS. Didn't see your post, Choke.

Edited February 16, 20169 yr by Redleg

fmd...I cant get anyone to pay a parking ticket and this scumbag gets a 3/4Million  handout !!

unreal

 

Crikey ... I didn't know Slobbo earned all that much!

Maybe someone else "chipped in".

6 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Just announced in the Supreme Court that Hird's costs order, to be paid to ASADA , of about $750k, have been paid by a white knight.

They weren't a LITTLE amount.

I wonder who the white knight could be.

Hird's claim against the Insurer has now been halved.

PS. Didn't see your post, Choke.

Redleg, I'm just trying to decode your little hint about the mystery benefactor. Surely "white knight" isn't code for Matthew Knights?

4 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Redleg, I'm just trying to decode your little hint about the mystery benefactor. Surely "white knight" isn't code for Matthew Knights?

The term " white knight" came from the article.

The "bolded" description was my guess.

Edited February 16, 20169 yr by Redleg

12 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

fmd...I cant get anyone to pay a parking ticket and this scumbag gets a 3/4Million  handout !!

unreal

 

but you don't have any secrets to hush up, bub 

3 minutes ago, Redleg said:

The term " white knight" came from the article.

The "bolded" description was my guess.

Hmm. I see nothing in bold. But LITTLE was capitalised. Is that a hint? All too subtle for me.

9 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

but you don't have any secrets to hush up, bub 

Don't you believe that. Know for a fact a certain dlander eats his weight in Chinese often....just saying ...lol

Edited February 16, 20169 yr by beelzebub

7 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Hmm. I see nothing in bold. But LITTLE was capitalised. Is that a hint? All too subtle for me.

Oi vey !!!

11 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

He might need the money. Some interesting rumours about the man and a supposed affair with a french girl that has delivered a bouncing baby this week.......

All according to my uber driver!

that would be priceless, if true. and dovetails into other rumours nicely.

1 hour ago, Choke said:

Apparently a 'mystery benefactor' paid his $750,000 legal bill to ASADA:

 Mystery benefactor paid off James Hird's $750,000 legal debt

Haha he is a lucky fella old Jimmy, wish I had friends like that.

5 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Oi vey !!!

JOE GUTNICK WAS THE BENEFACTOR!?!?!? Now I've hird everything.

1 hour ago, Choke said:

Apparently a 'mystery benefactor' paid his $750,000 legal bill to ASADA:

 Mystery benefactor paid off James Hird's $750,000 legal debt

As others have said, Little doubt as to who may feel so generous towards the twerp.

Can't believe that Teflon coated pretty boy has avoided consequences of his actions once again. Wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't orchestrated by the AFL. It makes my blood boil that his narcissistic sense of entitlement has yet been further boosted. That money should go to a far more deserving cause.

Think I need a Valium.

Edited February 16, 20169 yr by chook fowler

By all accounts Little and Hird weren't very buddy, buddy towards the end and neither was the AFL with Hird. 

I tend to think a coterie member put up the $750k... you know one of the influential type that miraculously 'convinced' Charter, Alavi etc not to testify at the AFL Tribunal. 

If my hunch is right, never fear, they will likely call in the favour one of these day, then Hird will pay his dues. 

Nobody stumps up $750K cool ones for no reason ... we may not hear about it but whoever it was will want to collect from the teflon one

Edited February 16, 20169 yr by Lucifer's Hero

I don't understand this action. 

Stumping up money to protect originally, I understand.

But he lost. He is disgraced. There is no longer a benefit to your club.

Why waste the money? 

11 minutes ago, deanox said:

I don't understand this action. 

Stumping up money to protect originally, I understand.

But he lost. He is disgraced. There is no longer a benefit to your club. Why waste the money? 

Unless.....

15 minutes ago, deanox said:

I don't understand this action. 

Stumping up money to protect originally, I understand.

But he lost. He is disgraced. There is no longer a benefit to your club.

Why waste the money? 

Obviously not disgraced in the eyes of the benefactor. 

And maybe it wasn't for the benefit of the club...re read my post just before yours...its the most logical explanation...

Schools warned not to use banned players

"Victorian schools have been warned not to use the banned  34 Essendon players in any coaching or mentoring capacity even if it is unpaid work...The warning to schools came after one leading grammar school in Melbourne sought clarification from the AFL if they could use one of the 34 players in their football program".

WOW!  I'm gobsmacked!  What symbolic message is this so called 'leading' school giving students: its ok to cheat, its ok to take drugs!  Can they not see the danger?  I wonder what the parents think?

Crickey, I'm beginning to wonder if it is only DL's who keep fighting the good fight, for drug free sport! 

1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

By all accounts Little and Hird weren't very buddy, buddy towards the end and neither was the AFL with Hird. 

I tend to think a coterie member put up the $750k... you know one of the influential type that miraculously 'convinced' Charter, Alavi etc not to testify at the AFL Tribunal. 

If my hunch is right, never fear, they will likely call in the favour one of these day, then Hird will pay his dues. 

Nobody stumps up $750K cool ones for no reason ... we may not hear about it but whoever it was will want to collect from the teflon one

I reckon that SALTA fellow may be involved.

1 hour ago, beelzebub said:

Unless.....

....it's what he knows.....

33 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/essendon-bombers/essendon-supplements-scandal-schools-warned-not-to-use-banned-players-20160216-gmvs16.html

"Victorian schools have been warned not to use the banned  34 Essendon players in any coaching or mentoring capacity even if it is unpaid work...The warning to schools came after one leading grammar school in Melbourne sought clarification from the AFL if they could use one of the 34 players in their football program".

WOW!  I'm gobsmacked!  What symbolic message is this so called 'leading' school giving students: its ok to cheat, its ok to take drugs!  Can they not see the danger?  I wonder what the parents think?

Crickey, I'm beginning to wonder if it is only DL's who keep fighting the good fight, for drug free sport! 

yes, but, but, the essendon 34 are surely different from real drug cheats

5 hours ago, beelzebub said:

fmd...I cant get anyone to pay a parking ticket and this scumbag gets a 3/4Million  handout !!

unreal

 

But you don't sell smoke, mirrors and cool aid ... 

2 hours ago, willmoy said:

....it's what he knows.....

Of course.....but what and on who. Lol

2 hours ago, daisycutter said:

yes, but, but, the essendon 34 are surely different from real drug cheats

Correct, they got caught.