GOODBYE MITCH CLARK

[JV7 2,354]

But from where would the backlash come? I wouldn't expect there to be much except from the minority of the most bitter Demons fans (I think many here, myself included, would wish Mitch all the best whatever he decides to do in the future). Not that I wouldn't be a little bit further heartbroken by such a scenario. The wider footballing world surely wouldn't give a fig.

Backlash probably wasn't the right word but the media would be all over it and some people would been questioning him about hesding to another club.. Just think if he slotted back in at the dees he'd be less scrutinised

[JV7 2,354]

[leucopogon 1,519]

Backlash probably wasn't the right word but the media would be all over it and some people would been questioning him about hesding to another club.. Just think if he slotted back in at the dees he'd be less scrutinised

Agreed, but given the mental health background it would be pretty low for the media to hound the guy over loyalty issues. In fact, such is the MFC hatred that prevails in most AFL media circles they would probably congratulate Mitch for taking himself away from the "toxic" MFC environment.

Edited September 2, 2014 by leucopogon

[Matt Demon 1,482]

I can't handle all this speculation!!

[Deecisive 1,709]

I like all here would love to see Mitch run out on the the MCG with the Dees next year. Though if this is not to happen i would hope that Mitch would at least provide the MFC with the chance to trade him to Freo or to where ever he intends to go, rather than just walking off to another club and leaving the Dees down a top 20 pick and no compensation. I believe he is a decent enough person to look after the dees as far as he can.

[WhyAlwaysMe 237]

I can't handle all this speculation!!

Call Mantherapy. They have a way of dealing with this.

[Moonshadow 17,677]

image.jpg

Does that mean he's going to Richmond?

[Ron Burgundy 8,584]

How much of a shot in the arm would it be to have the forward line we had thought we'd have at the start of this year for 2015: Clark, Hogan, Dawes, Kent, JKH and Howe.

[beelzebub 23,383]

How much of a shot in the arm would it be to have the forward line we had thought we'd have at the start of this year for 2015: Clark, Hogan, Dawes, Kent, JKH and Howe.

and then.........we wake up .........

[P-man 13,366]

I can't handle all this speculation!!

I hear ya.

It's ruddy torture supporting this club.

[McQueen 17,867]

and then.........we wake up .........

...a bit sticky.

[beelzebub 23,383]

...a bit sticky.

tmi

[Uncle Fester 2,848]

How much of a shot in the arm would it be to have the forward line we had thought we'd have at the start of this year for 2015: Clark, Hogan, Dawes, Kent, JKH and Howe.

That will never happen. Dawes got rubbed out, remember?

[McQueen 17,867]

tmi

True.

[P-man 13,366]

...a bit sticky.

tmi

Dawes got rubbed out, remember?

An unfortunate sequence of posts.

[Redleg 41,428]

How much of a shot in the arm would it be to have the forward line we had thought we'd have at the start of this year for 2015: Clark, Hogan, Dawes, Kent, JKH and Howe.

The same 6, I postulated as our forward line next year. If only.

[Curry & Beer 5,444]

anybody else just scan this thread for a new GNF post and ignore the rest?

[What 18,810]

anybody else just scan this thread for a new GNF post and ignore the rest?

yup lol

[deeflog 679]

anybody else just scan this thread for a new GNF post and ignore the rest?

i do that on about 90% of threads

[Still Waiting 94]

The MFC and Mitch Clark agreed to a mutual termination of the players contract. Financial details were not to be made public, as agreed to by both parties.

He is not on our list!

(ref; Josh Mahoney May 1 2014)

[titan_uranus 25,043]

The MFC and Mitch Clark agreed to a mutual termination of the players contract. Financial details were not to be made public, as agreed to by both parties.

He is not on our list!

(ref; Josh Mahoney May 1 2014)

Source?

I have this: "Clark will remain on the Demons' list for 2014 before being delisted at the end of the year, although Mahoney would not be drawn on the financial settlement surrounding Clark's contract – labelling it "inappropriate" to discuss at the time."

[Redleg 41,428]

The MFC and Mitch Clark agreed to a mutual termination of the players contract. Financial details were not to be made public, as agreed to by both parties.

He is not on our list!

(ref; Josh Mahoney May 1 2014)

Incorrect.

[Matt Demon 1,482]

The MFC and Mitch Clark agreed to a mutual termination of the players contract. Financial details were not to be made public, as agreed to by both parties.

He is not on our list!

(ref; Josh Mahoney May 1 2014)

Gerard Whateley & David King both checked with the AFL & he's definitely still on our list, It was mentioned on AFL360.

[Tyson_Viney_Toumpas 269]

So he's on the player list until list lodgement day but isn't contracted to the club as his contract has been terminated?? Is that what's going on here??

[Redleg 41,428]

So he's on the player list until list lodgement day but isn't contracted to the club as his contract has been terminated?? Is that what's going on here??

I am not sure that is the case either. I believe we came to a settlement of this year's obligations.