Jump to content

Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>

Featured Replies

Can ASADA now proceed with the show cause notices? Even if Ess appeal? Any legal eagles here clarify what happens next?

"

So the show cause notices stand. The next step would be for ASADA to re-impose its deadline for player responses to those show cause notices"

 
 

What a pleasure to hear a well-reasoned analysis, coloured neither by the Essendon apologist cheer-squad of journos, nor for that matter by those of us who have a range of reasons for wishing Essendon sunk.

Clear as day. And to top it off, even if he had found it was improper, he wouldn't tell ASADA to wipe its memory.

Can ASADA now proceed with the show cause notices? Even if Ess appeal? Any legal eagles here clarify what happens next?

Yes

Middleton: No useful purpose would be served by setting aside the notices.

Richard Ings @ringsau Follow

So the show cause notices stand. The next step would be for ASADA to re-impose its deadline for player responses to those show cause notices


Se Marvin...there was a KABOOM !!! :)

Schadenfreude.

Should I feel bad? Hell no!

What a pleasure to hear a well-reasoned analysis, coloured neither by the Essendon apologist cheer-squad of journos, nor for that matter by those of us who have a range of reasons for wishing Essendon sunk.

Clear as day. And to top it off, even if he had found it was improper, he wouldn't tell ASADA to wipe its memory.

How are those apologists going to try and spin this is going to be amazing to see!!!

 

Essendon are stuffed. They surely wouldn't waste money on an appeal, but they might be pig-headed enough to do so.

Hopefully now we can get down to what they all took, which is the real issue.

How are those apologists going to try and spin this is going to be amazing to see!!!

Conspiracy accusations I assume?

Man I hope the new ASADA deadline for the players' responses to notices is soon.


One thing he didn't directly address is what if Essendon players & Hird had refused to answer question until ASADA officials left the room.

However he did indirectly by saying that if the AFL had alone done an investigation it would have been proper for the AFL to give ASADA the details.

Does the ninth placed team appeal having missed the finals because of the afl allowing the bombers to play with this over their heads?

Worth the wait.

Squirm you basstards


Thought I'd have a look at bomberbliz just for a laugh. Site currently unavailable.

Hahahahahah!

My day has brightened by a substantial margin

not a doubter any longer eh OD :)

Thought I'd have a look at bomberbliz just for a laugh. Site currently unavailable.

Hahahahahah!

All. Things Essendon have crashed !!! Lol

Thought I'd have a look at bomberbliz just for a laugh. Site currently unavailable.

Hahahahahah!

Wouldn't matter anyway. The drugs section of their forum is private.

It was also interesting how the judge went into details about the way Hird et al impugned the ex-head of ASADA's evidence and at least by implication, her character. He said she took her time to answer questions because she was being careful to tell the truth.

Edited by sue

 

You keep missing my point bb

I have only ever said the players will get off with a low penalty.

Never said I did not want to see them ( EFC and Hird ) get smashed.

I have never said they did not do the wrong thing.

Like you I am enjoying this and the near future.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 114 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 31 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 22 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Love
    • 329 replies