Colin Garland, Melbourne, has been charged with a level one engaging in rough conduct offence (125 points, one match) against Kurt Tippett, Adelaide Crows, during the fourth quarter of the round 22 match between Melbourne and the Adelaide Crows, played at the MCG on Sunday August 26, 2012.

In summary, due to a five-year good record, he can accept a reprimand with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Adelaide Crows Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a level one offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has an existing five-year good record, reducing the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 70.31 points towards his future record.

Rohan Bail, Melbourne, has been charged with a level one engaging in rough conduct offence (125 points, one match) against Michael Doughty, Adelaide Crows, during the third quarter of the round 22 match between Melbourne and the Adelaide Crows, played at the MCG on Sunday August 26, 2012.

In summary, he can accept a reprimand with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Adelaide Crows Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a level one offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record, An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.

Colin Garland, Melbourne, has been charged with a level one engaging in rough conduct offence (125 points, one match) against Kurt Tippett, Adelaide Crows, during the fourth quarter of the round 22 match between Melbourne and the Adelaide Crows, played at the MCG on Sunday August 26, 2012.

In summary, due to a five-year good record, he can accept a reprimand with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Adelaide Crows Football Club, the incident was assessed as negligent conduct (one point), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a level one offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has an existing five-year good record, reducing the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 70.31 points towards his future record.

Rohan Bail, Melbourne, has been charged with a level one engaging in rough conduct offence (125 points, one match) against Michael Doughty, Adelaide Crows, during the third quarter of the round 22 match between Melbourne and the Adelaide Crows, played at the MCG on Sunday August 26, 2012.

In summary, he can accept a reprimand with an early plea.

Based on the video evidence available and a medical report from the Adelaide Crows Football Club, the incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and body contact (one point). This is a total of four activation points, resulting in a classification of a level one offence, drawing 125 demerit points and a one-match sanction. He has no existing good or bad record, An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to a reprimand and 93.75 points towards his future record.

Thanks goodness they're good boys with good records of behaviour and can play next Saturday against Fremantle.

I hope they continue to behave nicely when they go over there because I've been told the crowds in Perth are very dangerous - Ugly crowd scenes at Patersons Stadium.

Was Bail's the fence incident? with the naked eye, and 1 replay it didn't look like much.... made so much worse by the boot making a decent noise when striking the fence...

I have no idea about the Garland incident, but Bail is very lucky.

That was super dumb and he could have seriously injured his opponent. If the situation was reversed I'd be livid.

But, thank goodness they can both play on Saturday night and keep those finals dreams alive

Can someone explain the difference between a "good record" and "no record, good or bad"? If I've never incurred a speeding ticket or any other driving infringement, do I have a "good record", or "no record, good or bad"?

Can someone explain the difference between a "good record" and "no record, good or bad"? If I've never incurred a speeding ticket or any other driving infringement, do I have a "good record", or "no record, good or bad"?

I think the "no record, good or bad" means the player hasn't got a five year history.

I think the "no record, good or bad" means the player hasn't got a five year history.

Ah okay, thanks for that.

Clever *wink*

Can someone explain the difference between a "good record" and "no record, good or bad"? If I've never incurred a speeding ticket or any other driving infringement, do I have a "good record", or "no record, good or bad"?

You have a good record. And believe it or not, if Dustin Fletcher plays another five years without a suspension, he will have a good record as well.

Nothing for the head high hit on Jones in the first minute when he had his head over the ball???????

Bail is very lucky imo. Obviously took a dose of agro pills before the game (which I don't mind in the least) but throwing an opponent into the fence is not a 'tough' act.

Can someone explain the difference between a "good record" and "no record, good or bad"? If I've never incurred a speeding ticket or any other driving infringement, do I have a "good record", or "no record, good or bad"?

a good-record is afl-speak for no-record for 5 years

With the last game coming up I would take the one week penalty for each and start the new season with nothing hanging over their heads. Probably be accused of tanking but I would seriously do it.

Apparently there are 15 more MFC players charged by the MRP after the loss to Adelaide on the weekend.

They are each charged with falsely impersonating an AFL footballer.

The penalty handed down is........

Apparently there are 15 more MFC players charged by the MRP after the loss to Adelaide on the weekend.

They are each charged with falsely impersonating an AFL footballer.

The penalty handed down is........

Signing on to Demonland and starting a thread about yourself including a poll on whether you should be traded/sold/horsewhipped.

I'm surprised the MRP is game to cite a medical report from the crows after last time. Surely having been so badly duped by Dangerfield's serious concussion they would take anything Adelaide submits with more than a grain of salt.

I have no idea about the Garland incident, but Bail is very lucky.

That was super dumb and he could have seriously injured his opponent. If the situation was reversed I'd be livid.

But, thank goodness they can both play on Saturday night and keep those finals dreams alive

Garland's tackle on Tippett was almost a sling where he had his arms pinned.

Didn't look good, considering Tippett's headaches.