6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 ...

6. Watts

5. Petterd

4. McKenzie

3. Trengove

2. Nicholson

1. Blease

I know I'm desperate when the sub is getting a bloody vote.

6 - Ricky Petterd

5 - Jack Trengove

4 - Jordie McKenzie

3 - Jack Watts

[censored]...

2 - Stefan Martin

Uhh...

1 -

Ummm...

1 -

Ughh...okay...

1 - Nathan Jones

6 - Watts

5 - McKenzie

4 - Trengove

3 - Rivers

2 - Petterd

1 - Frawley

6 Trengove

5 Mckenzie

4 Watts

3 Petterd

2 Frawley

1 Howe

Just couldn't sneak Morton in the votes tonight...

Another failed test by Bailey, tonight's not gonna help his credentials!

Edited July 1, 201114 yr by Bring-Back-Powell

We were clearly outplayed tonight by bigger bodied opponents. It was a 'tired' performance by the Dees, and very hard to find four quarter contributors. My votes:

6. Trengove

5. Watts

4. McKenzie

3. Petterd

2. Jones

1. Howe

6. Trengove

5. Watts

4. Petterd

3. McKenzie

2. Frawley

1. Strauss

6. Petterd

5. Watts

4. Trengove

3. Frawley

2. McKenzie

1. Nicholson

I thought Gysberts was ok in the first half also and that's about it!

6. Petterd

5. Trengove

4. Martin

3. Watts

2. McKenzie

1. Jones

6 Trengove

5 McKenzie

4 Watts

3 Petterd

2 Frawley

1 Nicholson

6. McKenzie (Outstanding, again, by far our best for me)

5. Petterd

4. Trengove

3. Howe

2. Watts

1. Jones

6. Trengove

5. Watts

4. Petterd

3. Jones

2. Strauss

1. McKenzie (only for winning the ball. Griffen carved him up tonight).

6 - Mckenzie

5 - Watts

4 - Petterd

3 - Trengove

2 - Martin

1 - Howe

6. Trengove

5. Watts

4. Petterd

3. Jones

2. Strauss

1. McKenzie (only for winning the ball. Griffen carved him up tonight).

Spot on.

Martin was good again too.

Petterd worked hard but gees he's a shite decision maker!

6 Captain Trengove

5 Watts

4 McKenzie

3 Petterd

2 Martin

1 Jones

6. McKenzie (Outstanding, again, by far our best for me)

5. Petterd

4. Trengove

3. Howe

2. Watts

1. Jones

hardly by far our best, yes he won a lot of his own ball but his opponent was best on ground FFS, love jordie but he got towled up by griffin tonight, bad match up, griffin wayyyy to quick for mckenzie

6 - Trengove

5 - Watts

4 - McKenzie

3 - Petterd

2 - Frawley

1 - Howe

Edited July 1, 201114 yr by Range Rover

Votes for Strauss...is this the best six or the worst six?

I thought he had a terrible game.

I understand though that it's pretty hard to find six good players tonight.

Amazing how one week you could squeeze about 15 players in the votes, the next you struggle to find six decent performers.

6. The bar staff

6. Watts

5. Trengove

4. Petterd

3. Frawley

2. McKenzie

1. Martin

6. Watts

5. McKenzie

4. Trengove

3. Frawley

2. Howe

1. Petterd

Minus 100 votes to those on this forum who jump on and off the bandwagon depending on whether we win or lose! How can they say we are brilliant one week and rubbish the next. Patience ladies and gentlemen. Very young teams will suffer from inconsistency. We had one of our bad nights but support our boys don't rubbish them! 4 posters in the first half didn't help our cause either.

Edited July 1, 201114 yr by bobby mckenzie

Votes for Strauss...is this the best six or the worst six?

I thought he had a terrible game.

I understand though that it's pretty hard to find six good players tonight.

Amazing how one week you could squeeze about 15 players in the votes, the next you struggle to find six decent performers.

I nearly gave Strauss a vote. 21 possessions isn't too bad for a bloke who had a 'terrible game'.

6. Petterd

5. Trengove

4. Watts

3. Howe

2. Frawley

1. McKenzie

6. Watts

5. Trengove

4. Petterd

3. McKenzie

2. Howe

1. Martin

Votes for Strauss...is this the best six or the worst six?

I thought he had a terrible game.

I understand though that it's pretty hard to find six good players tonight.

Amazing how one week you could squeeze about 15 players in the votes, the next you struggle to find six decent performers.

For mine he lost one contest that I recall. Had 21 touches and hardly turned it over. Had one brain fade under pressure.