Jump to content

Featured Replies

Early indications are we got our first two picks right 

A comparison...

Jared Verse: 74 pass rush snaps, 16 QB pressures, 18% rate of pressures, 5 quick pressures

Micah Parsons: 110 pass rush snaps, 20 QB pressures, 17.5% rate of pressures, 6 quick pressures

 

A comparison...

Braden Fiske: 87 pass rush snaps, 14 pressures, 15.9% pressures, 4 quick pressures

Maxx Crosby: 100 pass rush snaps, 12 pressures, 11.7% pressures, 5 quick pressures

 

I know it's early but that's good company to be trending with. And yes they other teams will scheme for for those two stars but it's the tuft of grass on the cliff I'm holding on to 😂

 
 

Atlanta wins!

The Bucs were always winning until they weren't!  

 

No idea how we won that game… I turned it off after the missed conversion on 4th & 15 with a minute to go only to turn it back on to see it going into OT! 504 yards & 4 TDs for Kirk


On 01/10/2024 at 20:51, Macca said:

@Dr. Gonzo @layzie

The 3 Lead-pipe locks all failed to salute unless we did a Seinfeld and went the opposite!

So shove that idea!!

Yeah last week was pretty diabolical for my tipping. This week not much better, I'd go Steelers as my lock with Parsons and Lawrence both out and you just know Sal having to front up for Guess The Lines straight after means a loss for the Cowboys.

Don't see how Giants cover either with Malik Nabers unlikely so Seattle also a good bet even though they're giving a lot of points. And while the London games always throw up funny results I don't see how the Jets O-line withstands Flores' Vikings D. Jefferson, Addison and Nailor three decent receivers which we'll find it hard to cover too, only saving grace for the Jets is Darnold turns back into a pumpkin but more likely he gives an FU performance.

On 04/10/2024 at 17:01, Gorgoroth said:

Big miss by the refs at the end, Buccs should have had a facemask. But that's the game.

Holding at the line of scrimmage occurs first.


Bills  Ravens  Packers

Baltimore, Green Bay, Dallas


2 minutes ago, layzie said:

Mine are in Macca

Colts, Packers, Ravens 

Jets & Vikings on at 12.30am ... if I wasn't working I'd be tempted to do an all-nighter

Oh for the days when I could just take Monday's off! Probably get through the first half of the Jets/Vikes game though

SNF & MNF are good match-ups this week

2 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Wrong fred.

If you could ever get your head around a sport where gaining 2 or 3 yards in territory is often seem as a huge positive, then the NFL might be your go, ET

It's certainly an acquired taste and it can take years to fully appreciate.  But as slow as the sport can look, each play is unique and is hard to predict

And any sort of score can come from nowhere.  No 2 games are alike as well

The sport is way less violent these days but players will still use their helmet as weapons

And the Quarterbacks are well protected!!

 
6 minutes ago, Macca said:

If you could ever get your head around a sport where gaining 2 or 3 yards in territory is often seem as a huge positive, then the NFL might be your go, ET

It's certainly an acquired taste and it can take years to fully appreciate.  But as slow as the sport can look, each play is unique and is hard to predict

And any sort of score can come from nowhere.  No 2 games are alike as well

The sport is way less violent these days but players will still use their helmet as weapons

And the Quarterbacks are well protected!!

Tell me it’s more exciting than NRL? At least more athletic? I’m definitely willing to give it a try, would be good to get into a different/another sport. I only watch AFL and the NBA.

1 hour ago, Macca said:

Jets & Vikings on at 12.30am ... if I wasn't working I'd be tempted to do an all-nighter

Oh for the days when I could just take Monday's off! Probably get through the first half of the Jets/Vikes game though

SNF & MNF are good match-ups this week

I'd be happy even just with Monday  mornings off 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 629 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies