Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Bit nervous about starting a topic but thought this might be interesting. Just talking to my Hawk loving brother who has had witnessed so many premierships and eras. The Hawks are expert at identifying when a golden run ends and making the right decisions to get back and start another era. They don’t do much focus on it being a rebuild but a new chapter in their history. From afar it seems they also have a blueprint of the most important playing positions, player types and strategies to succeed

 

I'd take rebuilding advice from my long-suffering Blues-loving brother before I took advice from anyone Hawk-loving.

Hawks had 11 wins in 2019, so a very tight analogy to our 2024.

In fact, they also went out of finals in strait set sin 2018 and 2016, with a 10-win 2017 in between.

If you're going to tell me that the magic blueprint for success is spending the next four seasons lurking around the bottom four and having our next serious run at being a contender be 2031, I'm politely telling you to check your compass hasn't been magnetized.

Also, they're Hawthorn, so they can get taxidermed.

Their drafting has been good, to be sure. But in fairness the one thing I will definitely credit Hawthorn for is a really good, really consistent record of picking out players they can trade for who will fill set roles very well. Their recruiting from trade/free agency is as strong as Jason Taylor's draft record. Our trading hasn't really caught a bubble in a few years now.

Anyway, I still feel there's something a little bit fragile about the Hawks. Weird to say, given that they'll very likely be 8-0 or 7-1 by the time we face them.

The Hawks made some really poor decisions towards the end of their era as they tried to keep things going, decisions I wouldn't call expert at all. Ty Vickery? Jaeger O'Meara? Urgh...Tom Scully? They took a long time to hit the draft by trying to avoid bottoming out, and they failed.

I know plenty of Hawthorn supporters who weren't happy about those decisions, admittedly from a position of having the privilege of a stack of premierships and an expectation of continued success. Funny bit is they're all envious of how Geelong handled things.

 

We never had a modern era.... just one premiership and MANY LOST CHANCES

1 hour ago, Standard Deviation said:

The Hawks made some really poor decisions towards the end of their era as they tried to keep things going, decisions I wouldn't call expert at all. Ty Vickery? Jaeger O'Meara? Urgh...Tom Scully? They took a long time to hit the draft by trying to avoid bottoming out, and they failed.

I know plenty of Hawthorn supporters who weren't happy about those decisions, admittedly from a position of having the privilege of a stack of premierships and an expectation of continued success. Funny bit is they're all envious of how Geelong handled things.

Just like Collingwoods ability to win close games in ‘22 where we all thought it wouldn’t continue in ‘23.

The only way Hawks don’t dominate for another decade is if the game changes back to a form of contest / stoppage game. If that happens they are well and truly ******.


1 hour ago, picket fence said:

We never had a modern era.... just one premiership and MANY LOST CHANCES

Was going to post similar

We wasted a second chance if not more

It does suck to see the team struggling and seemingly unlikely to regain contender status after what many predicted would be a longer premiership window, but at least this team did win a flag.

Easy to say it was "only one" but some Melbourne fans had to wait a very long time to see it.

There's also quite a few highly regarded young players on the roster, more than you'd normally see for a team two years removed from three consecutive top four finishes, so there are some silver-linings in all of this.

21 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Was going to post similar

We wasted a second chance if not more

2022 we should have rested our best players as Geelong were doing as we often looked spent in the home & away

Finals ... ran out of legs. The one that got away

2023 ... ended up with a D Grade forward line in the finals. Our midfield & defence nearly got us over the line in both finals

2024 Decimated Midfield with a still, dysfunctional forward line. Never a chance

 
4 hours ago, 48 Year Now said:

Bit nervous about starting a topic but thought this might be interesting. Just talking to my Hawk loving brother who has had witnessed so many premierships and eras. The Hawks are expert at identifying when a golden run ends and making the right decisions to get back and start another era. They don’t do much focus on it being a rebuild but a new chapter in their history. From afar it seems they also have a blueprint of the most important playing positions, player types and strategies to succeed

I'm not sure what you're referring to. Hawthorn had an amazing run from 1983 to 1991. Even their 2 previous flags in 1976 and 1978 were arguably part of the same era. Then they waited 17 years for their second era to start, i.e. an average 'drought'. Now they're 9 and a half years into a mini-mini-drought. Maybe they win another flag soon but there's no guarantees. Hawk fans would be beaming ATM but with no actual proof yet of an astoundingly fast rebuild it's all speculation and assumptions.

Is it more kudos to the recruiters than to decisions to move along ageing stars about 8 years ago ? Is the Hawks resurgence because the direct replacements are now fully realising their potential?

5 hours ago, Macca said:

2022 we should have rested our best players as Geelong were doing as we often looked spent in the home & away

Finals ... ran out of legs. The one that got away

2023 ... ended up with a D Grade forward line in the finals. Our midfield & defence nearly got us over the line in both finals

2024 Decimated Midfield with a still, dysfunctional forward line. Never a chance

2025, all of the above plus more!


Sorry, but way to early to be calling it at this point. Yes we've been puss the last two weeks, but I have some faith that with a few players back, a bit of consistency within the team and a bit of confidence back that we will claw our way back to competitiveness this season.

8 hours ago, Macca said:

2022 we should have rested our best players as Geelong were doing as we often looked spent in the home & away

Finals ... ran out of legs. The one that got away

2023 ... ended up with a D Grade forward line in the finals. Our midfield & defence nearly got us over the line in both finals

2024 Decimated Midfield with a still, dysfunctional forward line. Never a chance

How i see it. Ive never seen our team challenged so much as they were in 2022. Its true what they say, everyone brings their best to play the premiers and the season simply was a few games too long. 2023 we had almost no forward and still lost close finals. Matthew Lloyd and others said it yesterday, premierships are hard to win so one is still a great achievement. That said I still have belief they turn it around this week and we get injured players back quickly, who knows!

yeah everyone thought collingwood were finished in 2021 then they got a new coach and went prelim flag with the same players. pendlebury went from cooked to superstar again. same with sidebottom. etc etc.

The last two games have been awful for sure, give the team some time to adapt. I’ve tempered my expectations a lot, will see how we’re going round 11 or 12. If senior players by then haven’t lifted their intensity/application/desire, then we’ll know where we stand.

The only way is through.

  • Author

It’s always difficult to convey full meaning to a football topic. I stand by what I say.

We win a magnificent Premiership, one I doubted I would ever see.

It looked like an era of success, the media thought so too. It has t been . No finals wins since the flag. So one flag in four years means an era is over, unless we win this year.


2 hours ago, biggestred said:

yeah everyone thought collingwood were finished in 2021 then they got a new coach and went prelim flag with the same players. pendlebury went from cooked to superstar again. same with sidebottom. etc etc.

I think that is one great observation re Pendles and Sidebottom. They were well and truly on the express train to retirement. It is amazing what McRae did to that list. Well and truly reinvigorated the club overnight.

I see Bucks in the same way I see Goody. Disciples of outdated , unexciting brand of footy. They belong to the halls of history that tried to change and adapt but failed. We need to think about transitioning from Goody in a way that doesn’t pull the rug out from underneath the players feet. I

11 hours ago, burnthefushias said:

It does suck to see the team struggling and seemingly unlikely to regain contender status after what many predicted would be a longer premiership window, but at least this team did win a flag.

Easy to say it was "only one" but some Melbourne fans had to wait a very long time to see it.

There's also quite a few highly regarded young players on the roster, more than you'd normally see for a team two years removed from three consecutive top four finishes, so there are some silver-linings in all of this.

Many Melbourne supporters were born and passed away before seeing a premiership. We should be grateful but an opportunity was lost as well.

14 hours ago, Little Goffy said:

I'd take rebuilding advice from my long-suffering Blues-loving brother before I took advice from anyone Hawk-loving.

Hawks had 11 wins in 2019, so a very tight analogy to our 2024.

In fact, they also went out of finals in strait set sin 2018 and 2016, with a 10-win 2017 in between.

If you're going to tell me that the magic blueprint for success is spending the next four seasons lurking around the bottom four and having our next serious run at being a contender be 2031, I'm politely telling you to check your compass hasn't been magnetized.

Also, they're Hawthorn, so they can get taxidermed.

Their drafting has been good, to be sure. But in fairness the one thing I will definitely credit Hawthorn for is a really good, really consistent record of picking out players they can trade for who will fill set roles very well. Their recruiting from trade/free agency is as strong as Jason Taylor's draft record. Our trading hasn't really caught a bubble in a few years now.

Anyway, I still feel there's something a little bit fragile about the Hawks. Weird to say, given that they'll very likely be 8-0 or 7-1 by the time we face them.

Hawks have won 16 of last 18 games. Far from fragile sadly Goffy.

They are also damn good to watch as hard as that is to say out loud.

8 hours ago, picket fence said:

2025, all of the above plus more!

Not feeling the love Mr Fence?

  • Author
3 hours ago, Front and centre said:

Many Melbourne supporters were born and passed away before seeing a premiership. We should be grateful but an opportunity was lost as well.

Absolutely


  • Author

Just looked at 21 team

Missing

Hibberd. Tough experienced ( not replaced)

Brayshaw. Heart and soul (Langford one game in)

Neil Bullen Hard at it (Thorstrup long way to go)

Jackson Our trump card ( JVR)

Ben Brown one of our best recruits of all time (Turner)

Harmes solid back up ( Windsor)

Jordan solid back up. Lindsay)

1 hour ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Not feeling the love Mr Fence?

Um Nope!

It’s the end and beginning of era’s. If you look at our list objectively it’s stronger now than when we won our Flag.

We’ve lost Hibberd, Brayshaw, Jackson, Harmes, ANB, Jordan and Brown and have added McVee, Langford, JVR, Windsor, Lindsay, Tholstrup and Turner.

It’s about gameplan, coaching and finding synergy. Thats what we’re working towards. There’s going to be bumps in the road. I for one expect Goodwin to gone at season’s end. I’d love the best assistant in the land to come or in my dreams, Kent Kingsley. Tough, smart and protective.

Edited by Roost it far

 
5 hours ago, Hellaintabadplacetobe said:

Hawks have won 16 of last 18 games. Far from fragile sadly Goffy.

They are also damn good to watch as hard as that is to say out loud.

yes this is my least favourite bit


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies