Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, rjay said:

We were out of gas 'Dazz'.

...not having a game last  week was always going to play out for us this way when we weren't far enough in front.

What? How can you be out of gas in round one?? 

 
11 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Kozzi?

Yep 

2 minutes ago, Demonised said:

I could be wrong, but I counted seven set shots with a total outcome of 1.1.

But were they quality set shots?

I remember one that came from a mark to a wide open Rivers. 

If you noticed, he ran wide to the pocket so by the time he marked the ball he wasn't in the most ideal position.

Had he run towards the centre of the field, he'd have better chances to get a goal.

Sometimes there's lack of awareness, i.e. Footy IQ.

 
2 minutes ago, Colm said:

Spewing to not get the points after that performance. A lot to like though, XL, AJ and Pettys performances impressed me. 

AJ? Brown gave him a bath, he is not the answer

14 minutes ago, DubDee said:

That one hurts real bad

We gave it everything

Toby Greene was the difference at the end

And he shouldnt have been playing. But nonetheless it was a good test. 

Ultimately i think we were disadvantaged by the fact that it was the GWS second game of the year. 


Last 3 losses to the Giants, cumulative loss of 7 points total - rough!! 

Do we play them again? Would love to settle the score. 

Same Old Melbourne

Killed on fast transition 

Dumb field kicks into center 

Cant kick straight when it matters.

 

If we can't beat GWS sans so many of their best we can't at all

1 minute ago, gs77 said:

And I so wish he'd done his classic run wide of the man on the mark and really roost thst shot on goal from 50 in the last - his conversion rate on those is solid.

The shot was in line me thinks, perhaps the wind made the ball fall short?

 

Hard game - lots of positives, but we were just a bit short and let them walk it out too easily. Glad I could make it there.

Loved seeing Oliver and Petracca. Gosh they’re serious talent.

4 minutes ago, Ugottobekidding said:

Not playing Langford till the last quarter is typical Goodwin logic

All subs are used either end of 3rd Q or start of the last. your point?

 


1 minute ago, Coobs said:

Same Old Melbourne

Killed on fast transition 

Dumb field kicks into center 

Cant kick straight when it matters.

 

If we can't beat GWS sans so many of their best we can't at all

Tbf we were missing Kozzy and McVee.

We really deserved to win that. Ah well.

Many little things to be annoyed about, far more reason to have some enthusiasm for the season.

Ah well. We miss out on the four points.

My two main observations;

We're not out of the picture for the 2025 premiership.

We're also seeing the core group of our locked-in fated-to-be 2028 premiership.

Just now, ElDiablo14 said:

The shot was in line me thinks, perhaps the wind made the ball fall short?

The wind was really peculiar. Very strong and random gusts.

1 minute ago, Red But Mostly Blue said:

Last 3 losses to the Giants, cumulative loss of 7 points total - rough!! 

Do we play them again? Would love to settle the score. 

Yep, in the Grand Final...

... we will atone those losses. :cool:


7 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Yeah you said he played his part on the loss?

The MRO may have but not Kozzi. his bump was shoulder height and completely fine aside from some [censored] falling over 

No, the bump was a dumb act and he needs to own it. There was zero need for it at the time and the start of our season was impacted by it

3 minutes ago, bobby1554 said:

What? How can you be out of gas in round one?? 

If you've ever played the game you will know the answer to that one.

Having a game under your belt is a big advantage, they were still running on top of the ground at the end.

Even Ed looked gassed for us..

I’m fairly comfortable saying the biggest difference wasn’t Toby, or accuracy, or our missing players. 

It was fitness.

They ran all four quarters out better than us. I’m sure it was because they played last week. Their last goal occurred mainly because we were gassed (although we shouldn’t have let them through the middle).

We did so much right for so long, but just couldn’t close out quarters. Combined with too many turnovers and them finding goals from Greene and Coniglio at exactly the right moments, meant we just couldn’t get a big enough lead to hold them off. 

We’ve clearly found one in Lindsay. Unbelievable debut. I reckon AJ looks promising, Henderson too, and Jeffo can at least kick straight. 

Real issues though with our small/mid defenders. Really missed McVee, and whilst Bowey played his best game in years, we felt really vulnerable in that area. Plus we of course also conceded a stack from turnover, but many sides will vs GWS this year. 

We showed real grit, a clear desire to want to move the ball, and good pressure. Plenty of reason to believe we can contend this year. But in a season where the fight for the top 8 is going to be brutal, we’ve just let 4 points go begging. 

1 minute ago, Little Goffy said:

We really deserved to win that. Ah well.

Many little things to be annoyed about, far more reason to have some enthusiasm for the season.

Ah well. We miss out on the four points.

My two main observations;

We're not out of the picture for the 2025 premiership.

We're also seeing the core group of our locked-in fated-to-be 2028 premiership.

Let's take it easy mate.

First thing is to be as high as possible on that ladder, we owe a 1st round pick to Essendon.


2 minutes ago, Pennant St Dee said:

No, the bump was a dumb act and he needs to own it. There was zero need for it at the time and the start of our season was impacted by it

So Darcy Moore didn't slide to the ball? So being at least reckless?

Most of their scores came from Finn Callaghan breaking lines. Just arches his back and away they go, zone broken. Phenomenal player. He was the reason for the last score as well. 

XL went well and I was particularly pleased with Bowey, as I have been very critical of him over the summer. 

Langford could barely move despite playing only one quarter. Especially when defending. He still found the ball ok but his stuff without the ball needs a lot of work. 

Fritsch played a pretty pathetic game. JVR couldn't take a grab either. But they played on Taylor and Buckley who are nigh unbeatable as a duo. 

Missed a few shots but so did they. Either result would have been fair...they happened to get in front at the right time.  

8 minutes ago, Ugottobekidding said:

Not playing Langford till the last quarter is typical Goodwin logic

Considering he came on in the third quarter, and hand his hands on his knees at the end of the 3rd, appears his fitness isn’t quite there and they’ll build him up.  Sounds like we’re protecting a young asset and working on his fitness / development 

 
16 minutes ago, bing181 said:

Really missed May, McVee and Pickett. A step too far with all the injuries/unavailable. Sure, lots to be positive about, but a loss is a loss.

Really odd take. They were missing Briggs, Hogan, Stringer and Riccardi and we led most of the day.

This wasn’t about personnel. 

4 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Yep, in the Grand Final...

... we will atone those losses. :cool:

Now that’s the kind of grudge match win I’m talking about.

BRING IT!!! 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

    • 80 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies