2025 MRO results so far for 2025.

325 charges, 27 suspensions, 282 fines. 7 Charges dismissed.

Collingwood have had 6 charges. 1 suspension, 4 fines and one charge dismissed.

Edited Tuesday at 00:391 day by John Crow Batty

2 hours ago, beelzebub said:

Question (rhetorical)

How often are Collingwood players EVER cited let alone suspended ?

2025 MRO results so far for 2025.

325 charges, 27 suspensions, 282 fines. 7 Charges dismissed.

Collingwood have had 6 charges. 1 suspension, 4 fines and one charge dismissed. Less than 2% of all charges laid.

You can do your own research here;

Zero Hanger

2025 AFL suspensions, MRO and Tribunal tracker

Every suspension, fine and dismissed charge of the 2025 AFL season.

Edited Tuesday at 00:481 day by John Crow Batty

The bias is as clear as day, the tribunal might as well wear their colours.

If your not playing for Collingwood you’re already guilty.

Cmon guys. you cant be seriously suggesting that a person who played 132 games and in a flag for a club would be BIASED towards their old club?

THATS RIDICULOUS

And the collective club presidents are saying what?

Afl is corrupt in this and many other issues

The minimum should be move this Christrian on what are his qualifications for the job

20 hours ago, ANG13 said:

How the [censored] did Moore not get sighted.

He got sighted all right. We all saw it.

The real question is why was nothing done about it.

17 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

He got sighted all right. We all saw it.

The real question is why was nothing done about it.

Average MRO charges is 18 per club this season so far. Collingwood have only 6. 👁️🦆🚶🏼🦆🗣️🦆=🦆

Moore deserved punishment for the knee BUT they also cleared Hugh Jackson for his knee on Zorko, so they're at least being a little consistent here. Both deserved punishment however.

8 hours ago, beelzebub said:

Question (rhetorical)

How often are Collingwood players EVER cited let alone suspended ?

Ever since Broady Boy stuck his nose in.

8 hours ago, SadDee said:

You ok, dear?

I find it funny that you think that he can be a dirty sniper.

When he gets suspended for his bumps, he only impacts his team. If you don’t see that, you’re the height of ignorance.

Mods, I'm not liking this gutter language above.

1 hour ago, Willmoy1947 said:

Mods, I'm not liking this gutter language above.

I have no intention to offend you, and if I did I apologize. I certainly didn’t appreciate your comment saying my opinion is the height of ignorance and essentially that it’s wrong when I am completely entitled to have my opinion.

10 hours ago, Redleg said:

Finn Maginnes who suffered a lacerated kidney from a knock might be very interested in that ruling.

Darcy is now a recidivist in injuring players with his knees and yet escapes punishment every time.

Jack Reiwoldt, Garry Lyon and even Nathan Buckley said he should have been suspended.

Just like Greene and his kicking during marking attempts. One has a tax named after him whilst the other gets away scott free.

Can anyone seriously think that Michael Christian is NOT biased?

Moore assaulted the Docker, lying on the ground, with his full weight via his knees. We have already seen him nearly kill one player, and this, with the opponent fixed on the ground could have been even worse. Yet MC says nothing to see!!

I wonder how he would view it if say a Daicos were to suffer a severe injury from a solid knee to the body, like in the Petracca case, or even worse in this week's one?

IF the AFL continue to reappoint him they clearly have an agenda.