Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

I don’t think a dedicated thread exists (pls merge if so) but felt like a dedicated thread for ppl interested makes more sense than talking about betting in random threads where there are people who just don’t want to talk about betting. 
 

Just decided to build a season multi anchored to Harvey Langford winning Rising Star only to realise he was crunched from $16 to $9 (now 2nd favourite) after the North sim. Ouch. 

 

Hawks $3.60 to miss the top 8. Dees $7.50 to Make the top 4. I wish i could be objective...

Ill stick with Demons to make top 8. Its Come down a little, still $2.80, so much better value than Dogs $2.20 and Crows $2.50.

I would prefer we didn't have a thread on betting at all...

...but, I guess that's just me.

 
  • Author
1 minute ago, rjay said:

I would prefer we didn't have a thread on betting at all...

...but, I guess that's just me.

I respect that not everybody loves betting but it isn’t illegal and is a pastime of many on Demonland.

Hence why I thought a separate thread made sense.

Perhaps just don’t visit the thread? 

12 minutes ago, The Jackson FIX said:

I respect that not everybody loves betting but it isn’t illegal and is a pastime of many on Demonland.

Hence why I thought a separate thread made sense.

Perhaps just don’t visit the thread? 

When I saw the thread title I thought we were going to be discussing the idea of getting rid of betting in the AFL.

The sooner it happens the better.

Edited by rjay


47 minutes ago, The Jackson FIX said:

Just decided to build a season multi anchored to Harvey Langford winning Rising Star only to realise he was crunched from $16 to $9 (now 2nd favourite) after the North sim. Ouch. 

I tried to do just that before the jagga smith injury.

tried with Oliver winning Brownlow and us in the tool 8.

i think I have 3 bets on,  they took the money but bn I really don’t know what is my bets.   Except I think if either one has a very good year and I think both will 

One of my bets will mature, very nicely for $5 investment 

my apps did not work how I thought they would.   Go Dee’s 

Clayton and Harvey. Yes !!

Thanks for setting this up J-Fix

Dees are excellent value this year due to our poor year last year. 

$8 to make top 4 is tasty

Im on Us to make top 8 plus Trac Brownlow. paying $75

I was pretty surprised on how long we were to make the 8, considering last year we weren't all that far away despite the injuries to many of our stars.  I'll be getting on that for sure.

 

Oliver for Brownlow is an interesting one.  Even in his dominant AFLCA winning seasons he didn't win, he was still a number of votes behind the eventual winner.  Not sure if they umpires love him enough to get him over the likes of Bont, Neale, Daicos, Cripps etc.  The umps will give those blokes 3 votes just for showing up sometimes.  I reckon Tracc is the better bet for Brownlow personally, the umps seem to like him.

 
4 minutes ago, BigFez said:

I was pretty surprised on how long we were to make the 8, considering last year we weren't all that far away despite the injuries to many of our stars.  I'll be getting on that for sure.

 

Oliver for Brownlow is an interesting one.  Even in his dominant AFLCA winning seasons he didn't win, he was still a number of votes behind the eventual winner.  Not sure if they umpires love him enough to get him over the likes of Bont, Neale, Daicos, Cripps etc.  The umps will give those blokes 3 votes just for showing up sometimes.  I reckon Tracc is the better bet for Brownlow personally, the umps seem to like him.

Agree on Oliver - he is his own worst enemy with the umpires unfortunately. 

Could we at least move this to the 'other topics' category so it doesn't keep getting bumped to the top of the main page?


Are us punters getting kicked off the main page?

We are discussing the Demons so don’t don’t see why 

We can include a few disclaimers about bet responsibility etc if it helps 

20 minutes ago, Dee Boys said:

Christ, if you’re not interested in the thread just don’t open it 🙄

 

image.gif

It would help keep readers away who are not interested in betting themselves, but who do have views of AFL gambling,  if the title of the thread was clearer.

1 hour ago, rjay said:

When I saw the thread title I thought we were going to be discussing the idea of getting rid of betting in the AFL.

The sooner it happens the better.

As someone who started betting almost 40 years ago I kind of disagree. That said I don't want to encourage others to bet AND there is way, way, way too much betting advertising (and betting 'infomercials') on TV. Way too much!

2 hours ago, rjay said:

When I saw the thread title I thought we were going to be discussing the idea of getting rid of betting in the AFL.

The sooner it happens the better.

No way of getting rid of betting on AFL - unless all sports betting is banned, which ain't gonna happen.

And even if it did a million illegal off shore betting sites would fill the void (you can bet on Victoria Soccer League games on such sites such is their ubiquity).

But i 1000% agree the promotion and advertising of betting should have severe limits placed on it - eg never during games, never embedded in footy shows, only after 9pm etc etc.

And the AFL, clubs and all sporting clubs should be forced to stop taking any gambling related advertising revenue and/or sponsorships.

All that said, whilst i fully acknowledge the deleterious impactbof sports betting I really enjoy punting on the footy. And a thread on demonland for like minded people is not a bad idea, particularly if people such as myself don't put punting related posts in other threads.


2 hours ago, The Jackson FIX said:

I don’t think a dedicated thread exists (pls merge if so) but felt like a dedicated thread for ppl interested makes more sense than talking about betting in random threads where there are people who just don’t want to talk about betting. 
 

Just decided to build a season multi anchored to Harvey Langford winning Rising Star only to realise he was crunched from $16 to $9 (now 2nd favourite) after the North sim. Ouch. 

Markets often overreact. I hope not but if Harvey's first or second real game is ordinary he will drift ....maybe more than he should.

 

Also I agree with changing the title. Maybe to "Good AFL bets this year"?

2 minutes ago, binman said:

No way of getting rid of betting on AFL - unless all sports betting is banned, which ain't gonna happen.

And even if it did a million illegal off shore betting sites would fill the void (you can bet on Victoria Soccer League games on such sites such is their ubiquity).

But i 1000% agree the promotion and advertising of betting should have severe limits placed on it - eg never during games, never embedded in footy shows, only after 9pm etc etc.

And the AFL, clubs and all sporting clubs should be forced to stop taking any gambling related advertising revenue and/or sponsorships.

All that said, whilst i fully acknowledge the deleterious impactbof sports betting I really enjoy punting on the footy. And a thread on demonland for like minded people is not a bad idea, particularly if people such as myself don't put punting related posts in other threads.

My thoughts exactly. Are clubs still making a small fortune with the *****  pokies? They seem to especially suck the money out of the pockets of the fiscally challenged, which is disturbing.

 

BTW did I see that a new Demonland podcast has landed? I look forward to listening to it.

1 hour ago, BigFez said:

Oliver for Brownlow is an interesting one.  Even in his dominant AFLCA winning seasons he didn't win, he was still a number of votes behind the eventual winner.  Not sure if they umpires love him enough to get him over the likes of Bont, Neale, Daicos, Cripps etc.  The umps will give those blokes 3 votes just for showing up sometimes.  I reckon Tracc is the better bet for Brownlow personally, the umps seem to like him.

100% agree.

Trac had a sneaky great year in 2024 before he got injured and was on track for 28-30 votes.

31 minutes ago, binman said:

No way of getting rid of betting on AFL - unless all sports betting is banned, which ain't gonna happen.

And even if it did a million illegal off shore betting sites would fill the void (you can bet on Victoria Soccer League games on such sites such is their ubiquity).

But i 1000% agree the promotion and advertising of betting should have severe limits placed on it - eg never during games, never embedded in footy shows, only after 9pm etc etc.

And the AFL, clubs and all sporting clubs should be forced to stop taking any gambling related advertising revenue and/or sponsorships.

All that said, whilst i fully acknowledge the deleterious impactbof sports betting I really enjoy punting on the footy. And a thread on demonland for like minded people is not a bad idea, particularly if people such as myself don't put punting related posts in other threads.

I really meant advertising 'bin'...I'm not a believer in banning things. Drug and alcohol being prime examples of it doesn't work,...

27 minutes ago, rjay said:

I really meant advertising 'bin'...I'm not a believer in banning things. Drug and alcohol being prime examples of it doesn't work,...

We're on the same page there Rjay - in 30 years people will look back in horror at the wall-to-wall sports betting advertising and how embedded it's become in footy the way we look back at Big tobacco sponsoring Australian Cricket (not to mention touring cars, footy etc etc) and cigarettes being advertised all over the place 

(in my mind's eye i still see Benson's and Hedges gold livery when i think back to cricket in the 70s - no coincidence that until i gave up smoking when i was 30 my go to was Benson and Hedges Extra Mild) 

Edited by binman


  • Author
3 hours ago, rjay said:

When I saw the thread title I thought we were going to be discussing the idea of getting rid of betting in the AFL.

The sooner it happens the better.

I don’t disagree re. the advertising 

1 hour ago, Dee Boys said:

Christ, if you’re not interested in the thread just don’t open it 🙄

 

image.gif

I click on next unread topic.

This thread keeps popping up, therefore I can't avoid it.

I think it should be in the general topics area.

Another option would be if we could block a topic.

1 hour ago, Dee Boys said:

Christ, if you’re not interested in the thread just don’t open it 🙄

 

image.gif

 

3 hours ago, rjay said:

When I saw the thread title I thought we were going to be discussing the idea of getting rid of betting in the AFL.

The sooner it happens the better.

...and that post re guitar lessons is funnier than you think.

Edited by rjay

 
  • Author
1 hour ago, ManDee said:

I click on next unread topic.

This thread keeps popping up, therefore I can't avoid it.

I think it should be in the general topics area.

Another option would be if we could block a topic.

Haha what do you mean you can’t avoid it?! Just don’t click on it 🤣


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 154 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 42 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Like
    • 327 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

    • 31 replies