Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

For those of us unable to attend or view the online stream, aside from the notification put out by the club of the successful new board members, did anything else of note get talked about at the AGM or was it just the same old same old?

 
7 hours ago, Demon Disciple said:

For those of us unable to attend or view the online stream, aside from the notification put out by the club of the successful new board members, did anything else of note get talked about at the AGM or was it just the same old same old?

Sorry you can’t access the reports on the MFC website DD, but the President, CEO, Financial, Goodwin and Stinear Reports were all very positive and informative and a lot of members questions were answered by each of the presenters. Would have liked to have been there for the Q&A session after the presentation, but the club is in a very solid situation and I believe Good hands.

Watching the live stream on the night, they did say that while they were unable to stream the final Q and A session due to broadcasting restrictions, they would get them up on the club site for all to see. Hopefully today some time. Agree this would be very interesting to watch.

 

Just doing a quick maths calculation, and assuming that all voters would have endorsed Steven Smith, is it only members who have renewed for 2025 who are eligible to vote? 

Doing the maths, 23% of eligible voters voted, and Steven Smith received 8.3k, that puts our membership tally at around 36k. This aligns with the recently updated membership tally on Demonland. Our membership for 2024 was 67k, which means a lot of 2024 members weren't eligible to vote in a 2024 election.

It doesn't bother me because my membership rolls over, but I'm curious if this is the case. 

Edited by mo64

17 minutes ago, mo64 said:

Just doing a quick maths calculation, and assuming that all voters would have endorsed Steven Smith, is it only members who have renewed for 2025 who are eligible to vote? 

Doing the maths, 23% of eligible voters voted, and Steven Smith received 8.3k, that puts our membership tally at around 36k. This aligns with the recently updated membership tally on Demonland. Our membership for 2024 was 67k, which means a lot of 2024 members weren't eligible to vote in a 2024 election.

It doesn't bother me because my membership rolls over, but I'm curious if this is the case. 

That is not correct.

It is 2024 members who vote for the 2024 AGM/Election.


I was happy to hear there is already $10m pledged towards the home base and hopefully more to come…

3 hours ago, Big Gun said:

Watching the live stream on the night, they did say that while they were unable to stream the final Q and A session due to broadcasting restrictions, they would get them up on the club site for all to see. Hopefully today some time. Agree this would be very interesting to watch.

All the videos are online inc the open Q&A

3 hours ago, Redleg said:

That is not correct.

It is 2024 members who vote for the 2024 AGM/Election.

If that's the case then about 30,000 members are ineligible to vote. We must have a lot of pets as members.

 
4 hours ago, Big Gun said:

Watching the live stream on the night, they did say that while they were unable to stream the final Q and A session due to broadcasting restrictions, they would get them up on the club site for all to see. Hopefully today some time. Agree this would be very interesting to watch.

https://www.melbournefc.com.au/video/1705616/agm-question-answers?videoId=1705616&modal=true&type=video

 

Here is the link for the Q and A. Interesting watch to put it politely. 

27 minutes ago, mo64 said:

If that's the case then about 30,000 members are ineligible to vote. We must have a lot of pets as members.

Or kids, 3 game memberships, restricted not full memberships etc, or the percentage stated was incorrect.


There was one statement that I hoped would be responded to about how poor our goal kicking is/has been and it looked as if Richo was going to have a right of reply but the next part of the question started to be answered and he put the microphone down. 

4 hours ago, mo64 said:

If that's the case then about 30,000 members are ineligible to vote. We must have a lot of pets as members.

Children under 18 can’t vote…..

If under 18 no vote, then my 6 reduces to 2, and we had too much on,  but interested.

Feel like it's voting at a Company AGM. The proxy votes have the candidate selected and chosen, individual votes give a vibe.  Not a result. 

Geez, I'm 11 minutes into watching the Q&A session from the other night online and it's a hard watch. Is it always complete peanuts that hog the microphone at these events? 


33 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Geez, I'm 11 minutes into watching the Q&A session from the other night online and it's a hard watch. Is it always complete peanuts that hog the microphone at these events? 

I made it to 37 mins. Quite embarrassing.

36 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Geez, I'm 11 minutes into watching the Q&A session from the other night online and it's a hard watch. Is it always complete peanuts that hog the microphone at these events? 

Absolutely cringeworthy is it.? 


If that is the standard of the voters then we are in for a lot of pain in the future, and probably explains why we are where we are as a club.

 

37 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Geez, I'm 11 minutes into watching the Q&A session from the other night online and it's a hard watch. Is it always complete peanuts that hog the microphone at these events? 

Some Bomber nuff whinged about them playing at Geelong and got a near standing O.

54 minutes ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

Geez, I'm 11 minutes into watching the Q&A session from the other night online and it's a hard watch. Is it always complete peanuts that hog the microphone at these events? 

One and a half questions in and my head hurts. 

The first question felt like it went for 2 hours - 99% of which was the fella providing important 'context' to frame his question - including referencing mutiple articles.

Green gave an answer (of sorts) and asked if that addressed the question, to which Mr 'I have dealt with bs all my life' responded with something like 'well that's your answer, wether I accept it or not....'.

Jesus wept.

I'll bet green is ruing his commitment to transparency. 

Edited by binman


14 minutes ago, george_on_the_outer said:

Absolutely cringeworthy is it.? 


If that is the standard of the voters then we are in for a lot of pain in the future, and probably explains why we are where we are as a club.

 

It could have been a Guinness Book of Records attempt to fit the most amount of stupid people in the one room at the same time. 

The fact Brad Green had to answer a question about if the club was against anti-semitism blew my mind….

1. Obviously the club is against that and any other form of racism or discrimination. If you’re not in the modern world then have a look at yourself.

2. What does that have to do with the club financial or on field performance?

Edited by DistrACTION Jackson

3 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

The fact Brad Green had to answer a question about if the club was against anti-semitism blew my mind….

1. Obviously the club is against that and any other form of racism or discrimination. If you’re not in the modern world then have a look at yourself.

2. What does that have to do with the club financial or on field performance?

I might go next year and ask if we're against genetically modified crops and suggest we open a cat cafe at Casey Fields. 

 
1 minute ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

I might go next year and ask if we're against genetically modified crops and suggest we open a cat cafe at Casey Fields. 

What is our stance on AI and do we think it will help or hinder our training methods

29 minutes ago, binman said:

One and a half questions in and my head hurts. 

The first question felt like it went for 2 hours - 99% of which was the fella providing important 'context' to frame his question - including referencing mutiple articles.

Green gave an answer (of sorts) and asked if that addressed the question, to which Mr 'I have dealt with bs all my life' responded with something like 'well that's your answer, wether I accept it or not....'.

Jesus wept.

I'll bet green is ruing his commitment to transparency. 

I found the suggestion about building a retirement village for our supporters out at Caulfield convinced me......to vote for mandatory euthanasia at the age of 70 if it ever gets to parliament. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 86 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 316 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies