Jump to content

Discussion on recent allegations about the use of illicit drugs in football is forbidden

Great Sage

Members
  • Posts

    94
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Great Sage

  1. Great observation and surprised/not surprised that media have not run with this. It’s also subtle messaging to AFL ahead of any additional findings findings in Smith investigation.
  2. Not saying it will happen, but on SEN today Dermie suggested trying Tomlinson forward. He was part time coach at GWS when Tommo played there.
  3. They just make stuff up. I was at the game and May gave Melky a big hug at the end of the game.
  4. Absolutely love the Deebrief Pods each week. Well worth a listen.
  5. Form to determine selection. Flag Kossie to re-sign JVR to play 15+ games
  6. Clearly we multiple options for a variety of positions next year. A great place to be. Injuries will often dictate options but I'm hoping we return to form being the deciding factor for selection each week. It's why Bowie kept his spot after Hunt recovered and Jones didn't play in the finals despite many of us wanting him to in 21. It will ensure pressure for spots which ultimately makes us a better team.
  7. I would appreciate if anyone knows the answer to this question. I am prepared to confirm if May is there as payment 😜
  8. In 2021 I remember reading and club interview that he was one of our best at spreading to make position. An important attribute for momentum and maintaining possession.
  9. My thoughts BB in for Weids (JVR only if BB doesn't come up). Harmes in as sub. Also think Brayshaw stays as mid for rest of year if he plays to same level as last week. Our midfield becomes stronger and it allows for Hunt or Bowie to stay in the team. Harmes becomes regular sub or replacement for Melk should his form drop.
  10. I couldn't get any tickets with membership 2 days ago. Was able to get 3 together tonight. I would say they have opened up unused AFL and general admission.
  11. I find it interesting that many are comfortable stating that Ben Browns form last year was an aberration, but cannot do the same for Tmac.
  12. They mentioned that we had been winning previous games due to crumbing in forward line and were unbalanced with Jackson out. I would also suggest we needed insurance for Gawn given how quickly he came back from injury and what we now know re seriousness.
  13. It was strange - Hope he is ok. I thought he might be unwell, given he had to grab a tissue.
  14. Surprised at the concern re TMac. He didn't star but certainly held his own and showed his class on occasions - was also very vocal with instructions. Only knock would be that he got caught with the ball a couple of times but he was noticeably taking players on (perhaps under instruction). He also made several centimeter perfect passes over 30-40 meters. At one stage Jade Rawlings ran onto the ground to congratulate him on getting through traffic and kicking a great pass that resulted in a shot at goal. Had to wait to be heard as Tom was shouting instructions to teammates re positioning. FWIW thought Grimes played well and seemed to be enjoying the freedom of the wing.
  15. Fair point. Still believe it would have made a significant difference though. Certainly couldn't see Hardwick agreeing to tank.
  16. It's as simple as we said no to Hardwick and Richmond said yes.
  17. Best article I have read on the tanking debate. Takes all of my thoughts on the issue and articulates them with eloquence. Well done & thanks Adrian!!
  18. When you review the number of wins for 3 seasons before and after those stated above there are two obvious conclusions; 1. All of these teams tanked 2. Most did it better than us Melbourne 13 5 3 4 8.5 8.5 4 Richmond 15 7 7 4 10 11 3.5 Collingwood 13 15 8 5 14 13 12 West Coast 15 4 8 4 17 15 Carlton 10 4.5 3 4 10 13 11 Hawthorn 11 12 4 5 9 13 17
  19. Love this idea Clint. I too have donated $200 to the club today and will do the same again if your idea get legs.
  20. My comments were general rather than specific as I do not have an issue with any individual posters, just think that some get carried away with their opinions and how they articulate them. If I was to disect your points specifically, I would say that I agree with 1,2 & 4 whilst understanding that individual performances can be influenced by team performance when it comes to supply, blocking, defensive efforst and time in possession. On point 3 I do not know if he is flawed (particularly as a leader) and would agree with Neeld when he says you need to be in the inner sanctum to truly understand a club/player. However I am curious as to what changed your opinion of Beamers leadership from your first post in this thread to now?
×
×
  • Create New...