Jump to content


Recommended Posts

Posted

Ken Hinkley would be an outstanding Head of Football at the Deez. He brings not only a wealth of experience but also a deep understanding of the cultural and structural foundations necessary for sustained success. His tenure at Alberton with Port Adelaide is a testament to his ability to resurrect a struggling club. When Hinkley took over, Port Adelaide was perceived as a basket case, both financially and on-field. Under his leadership, the club became relevant again, not just in South Australia but across the broader Australian football landscape. He revitalised the team, instilling a sense of belief and (mostly) competitive spirit that transformed Port Adelaide into a consistent force in the AFL.

Hinkley's leadership is defined by his humanity and decency, qualities that have earned him respect across the entire AFL fraternity. His genuine care for players and staff, coupled with his straightforward and honest communication style, fosters a positive and inclusive environment. These attributes are critical in a head of football role, where building and maintaining relationships are as important as strategic decisions.

Furthermore, Hinkley's reputation as a respected and influential figure in the AFL would be invaluable to the Demons. His ability to navigate complex challenges, manage diverse personalities, and maintain high standards would ensure that Melbourne reclaims its status as powerhouse in the competition. Hinkley's proven track record of fostering talent and driving cultural change aligns perfectly with, what should be, Melbourne's aspirations. He is an ideal candidate to lead the football department and guide the Demons to continued success.

  • Like 3

Posted
2 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Ken Hinkley would be an outstanding Head of Football at the Deez. He brings not only a wealth of experience but also a deep understanding of the cultural and structural foundations necessary for sustained success. His tenure at Alberton with Port Adelaide is a testament to his ability to resurrect a struggling club. When Hinkley took over, Port Adelaide was perceived as a basket case, both financially and on-field. Under his leadership, the club became relevant again, not just in South Australia but across the broader Australian football landscape. He revitalised the team, instilling a sense of belief and (mostly) competitive spirit that transformed Port Adelaide into a consistent force in the AFL.

Hinkley's leadership is defined by his humanity and decency, qualities that have earned him respect across the entire AFL fraternity. His genuine care for players and staff, coupled with his straightforward and honest communication style, fosters a positive and inclusive environment. These attributes are critical in a head of football role, where building and maintaining relationships are as important as strategic decisions.

Furthermore, Hinkley's reputation as a respected and influential figure in the AFL would be invaluable to the Demons. His ability to navigate complex challenges, manage diverse personalities, and maintain high standards would ensure that Melbourne reclaims its status as powerhouse in the competition. Hinkley's proven track record of fostering talent and driving cultural change aligns perfectly with, what should be, Melbourne's aspirations. He is an ideal candidate to lead the football department and guide the Demons to continued success.

Is this the Ken Hinkley that was booed off by Port fans this season? Just asking.

And the witches hats last night, wow what a great culture.


Posted

Not a bad suggestion.

The Football Dept. definitely needs to be reviewed in light of our player issues and poor trading over the past 3 years. And what's more concerning is Alan Richardson coming out and saying we need to get older not younger. I fear we may fall off the precipice very quickly with the current regime.


Posted
4 minutes ago, Satyriconhome said:

Is this the Ken Hinkley that was booed off by Port fans this season? Just asking.

And the witches hats last night, wow what a great culture.

What was Alan Richardson's record as a coach? 

For the reasons QD stated, Hinkley would be a good candidate as the Head of Football.

  • Like 2


Posted

I don't mind the idea as Hinkley seems like a great people person. Seems to have good managerial skills.

Not sure why some would bring up his finals record. Footy boss is a fairly different role to a coach. Take Balme, who was an average coach but probably the best footy boss the game has seen.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Clap 2
Posted

I'd be going for someone to balance Goody, not another people person. We need someone in the role that can have tough conversations hold the top standards.

Judging by the last 12 months, that's not Richo.

  • Like 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Adam The God said:

I'd be going for someone to balance Goody, not another people person. We need someone in the role that can have tough conversations hold the top standards.

Judging by the last 12 months, that's not Richo.

Haha jinx 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Posted
6 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

I'd be going for someone to balance Goody, not another people person. We need someone in the role that can have tough conversations hold the top standards.

Judging by the last 12 months, that's not Richo.

Plus I heard he did a terrible job on Clayton's lawn.

Posted

I actually have always thought he gets the best out of a list which has huge holes in it. And he seems like a top bloke. 
 

However, as anyone who has read my posts - all one of you- world know, I am not dissatisfied with the current coach.

  • Like 1

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ollie fan said:

I actually have always thought he gets the best out of a list which has huge holes in it. And he seems like a top bloke. 
 

However, as anyone who has read my posts - all one of you- world know, I am not dissatisfied with the current coach.

Can you have 12 years of not addressing holes and not even a GF?


Posted

Ken is Richo with a better list.

Chris Davies does a fantastic job with Port’s list. Not withstanding the occasional misstep like going hard for Esava. Port take risks, rejuvenate, evolve the playing group.

Maybe he has a understudy who could come in to our footy admin team.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

Can you have 12 years of not addressing holes and not even a GF?

Yes. Because the longer you stay up the harder it is to keep filling holes.

The big problem with Kenny is he’s always overvalued skills over toughness. Can take the boy out off the half back flank but can’t take the half back flanker out of the ball 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said:

Yes. Because the longer you stay up the harder it is to keep filling holes.

The big problem with Kenny is he’s always overvalued skills over toughness. Can take the boy out off the half back flank but can’t take the half back flanker out of the ball 

The first bit is definitely spot on.

But his midfield has had Wines and Drew for a while. Neither fit the skills over toughness review 

Posted
31 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I was going to [censored] can this proposal .... but now I fully support it.

Why ..... because I just noticed Saty is opposed .

I'd give up the booze before agreeing with Saty !!!

I agree with you, said over a schooner of Great Northern


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...