Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Ken Hinkley would be an outstanding Head of Football at the Deez. He brings not only a wealth of experience but also a deep understanding of the cultural and structural foundations necessary for sustained success. His tenure at Alberton with Port Adelaide is a testament to his ability to resurrect a struggling club. When Hinkley took over, Port Adelaide was perceived as a basket case, both financially and on-field. Under his leadership, the club became relevant again, not just in South Australia but across the broader Australian football landscape. He revitalised the team, instilling a sense of belief and (mostly) competitive spirit that transformed Port Adelaide into a consistent force in the AFL.

Hinkley's leadership is defined by his humanity and decency, qualities that have earned him respect across the entire AFL fraternity. His genuine care for players and staff, coupled with his straightforward and honest communication style, fosters a positive and inclusive environment. These attributes are critical in a head of football role, where building and maintaining relationships are as important as strategic decisions.

Furthermore, Hinkley's reputation as a respected and influential figure in the AFL would be invaluable to the Demons. His ability to navigate complex challenges, manage diverse personalities, and maintain high standards would ensure that Melbourne reclaims its status as powerhouse in the competition. Hinkley's proven track record of fostering talent and driving cultural change aligns perfectly with, what should be, Melbourne's aspirations. He is an ideal candidate to lead the football department and guide the Demons to continued success.

 
2 minutes ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

Ken Hinkley would be an outstanding Head of Football at the Deez. He brings not only a wealth of experience but also a deep understanding of the cultural and structural foundations necessary for sustained success. His tenure at Alberton with Port Adelaide is a testament to his ability to resurrect a struggling club. When Hinkley took over, Port Adelaide was perceived as a basket case, both financially and on-field. Under his leadership, the club became relevant again, not just in South Australia but across the broader Australian football landscape. He revitalised the team, instilling a sense of belief and (mostly) competitive spirit that transformed Port Adelaide into a consistent force in the AFL.

Hinkley's leadership is defined by his humanity and decency, qualities that have earned him respect across the entire AFL fraternity. His genuine care for players and staff, coupled with his straightforward and honest communication style, fosters a positive and inclusive environment. These attributes are critical in a head of football role, where building and maintaining relationships are as important as strategic decisions.

Furthermore, Hinkley's reputation as a respected and influential figure in the AFL would be invaluable to the Demons. His ability to navigate complex challenges, manage diverse personalities, and maintain high standards would ensure that Melbourne reclaims its status as powerhouse in the competition. Hinkley's proven track record of fostering talent and driving cultural change aligns perfectly with, what should be, Melbourne's aspirations. He is an ideal candidate to lead the football department and guide the Demons to continued success.

Is this the Ken Hinkley that was booed off by Port fans this season? Just asking.

And the witches hats last night, wow what a great culture.

 

Not a bad suggestion.

The Football Dept. definitely needs to be reviewed in light of our player issues and poor trading over the past 3 years. And what's more concerning is Alan Richardson coming out and saying we need to get older not younger. I fear we may fall off the precipice very quickly with the current regime.


4 minutes ago, Satyriconhome said:

Is this the Ken Hinkley that was booed off by Port fans this season? Just asking.

And the witches hats last night, wow what a great culture.

What was Alan Richardson's record as a coach? 

For the reasons QD stated, Hinkley would be a good candidate as the Head of Football.

I was going to [censored] can this proposal .... but now I fully support it.

Why ..... because I just noticed Saty is opposed .

I'd give up the booze before agreeing with Saty !!!

 

I don't mind the idea as Hinkley seems like a great people person. Seems to have good managerial skills.

Not sure why some would bring up his finals record. Footy boss is a fairly different role to a coach. Take Balme, who was an average coach but probably the best footy boss the game has seen.

I'd be going for someone to balance Goody, not another people person. We need someone in the role that can have tough conversations hold the top standards.

Judging by the last 12 months, that's not Richo.

Ken is too nice. I think that’s the problem with Richo too. We need a hard liner in the role to balance out Goodwin IMO.

1 minute ago, Adam The God said:

I'd be going for someone to balance Goody, not another people person. We need someone in the role that can have tough conversations hold the top standards.

Judging by the last 12 months, that's not Richo.

Haha jinx 


6 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

I'd be going for someone to balance Goody, not another people person. We need someone in the role that can have tough conversations hold the top standards.

Judging by the last 12 months, that's not Richo.

Plus I heard he did a terrible job on Clayton's lawn.

I actually have always thought he gets the best out of a list which has huge holes in it. And he seems like a top bloke. 
 

However, as anyone who has read my posts - all one of you- world know, I am not dissatisfied with the current coach.

2 minutes ago, Ollie fan said:

I actually have always thought he gets the best out of a list which has huge holes in it. And he seems like a top bloke. 
 

However, as anyone who has read my posts - all one of you- world know, I am not dissatisfied with the current coach.

Can you have 12 years of not addressing holes and not even a GF?


Ken is Richo with a better list.

Chris Davies does a fantastic job with Port’s list. Not withstanding the occasional misstep like going hard for Esava. Port take risks, rejuvenate, evolve the playing group.

Maybe he has a understudy who could come in to our footy admin team.

2 minutes ago, Adam The God said:

Can you have 12 years of not addressing holes and not even a GF?

Yes. Because the longer you stay up the harder it is to keep filling holes.

The big problem with Kenny is he’s always overvalued skills over toughness. Can take the boy out off the half back flank but can’t take the half back flanker out of the ball 

 
1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said:

Yes. Because the longer you stay up the harder it is to keep filling holes.

The big problem with Kenny is he’s always overvalued skills over toughness. Can take the boy out off the half back flank but can’t take the half back flanker out of the ball 

The first bit is definitely spot on.

But his midfield has had Wines and Drew for a while. Neither fit the skills over toughness review 

31 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

I was going to [censored] can this proposal .... but now I fully support it.

Why ..... because I just noticed Saty is opposed .

I'd give up the booze before agreeing with Saty !!!

I agree with you, said over a schooner of Great Northern


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 100 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 372 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies