Jump to content

Featured Replies

25 minutes ago, DemonOX said:

We need to NAIL everything this offseason. 

Yes we do but what does that entail? For me it would be, given we could have 7 spots to fill, at least 2 young midfielder draftees with leg speed & foot skills & add a mature, big bodied, inside possession accumulator. Then we need a 200 cm forward ruck to run cover for Max. If there is an opportunity, let’s find a big marking forward, but that’s second tier stuff. In the end the only sure thing is to go to the draft, get some kids who can run. 

 
2 hours ago, ElDiablo14 said:

So only an Academy player or F/S can get in our way. 

Ashcroft.

5 becomes 6

1 hour ago, Colm said:

I know we need an A grade midfielder but what’s peoples thoughts on splitting pick 5? 
Given the evenness and depth of this draft if we could get a top 10 and a later first round pick it might be worth it. Give JT two picks to work with. 
Also I wonder if the combine might change the order a bit more this year than others. Could be a few bolters

I've thought this too. Perhaps Jason Taylor has a couple of players he really likes around 10 and 15. Would have to be a really special deal for us to part with 5 (6).

 
1 hour ago, The end is nigh said:

If Richmond end up with a whole bunch of first rounders and we could get one still in the top 10 and another, I like it 

Absolutely not. We need an A grader that is ready to play. You don’t get them with picks 10 and 14 as we have been attempting 

Need our second pick back from Adelaide.

It's not a bad pick now . For example it's higher than the pick at which we selected fritsch and I think rivers 

I'm not adverse to trading our future first and dipping into the draft three times if the recruiters think the depth is there 

Edited by Diamond_Jim


'Nailing' this off season is definitely the catch cry around here. Hopefully next year there will be a nail death ride thread 

6 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Need our second pick back from Adelaide.

It's not a bad pick now . For example it's higher than the pick at which we selected fritsch and I think rivers 

I'm not adverse to trading our future first and dipping into the draft three times if the recruiters think the depth is there 

Probably get pick 25 and later pick swap from Crows for the ANB trade 

It’s a strong draft.  I would like to see us try to get 3 picks in top 30. 

5 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Probably get pick 25 and later pick swap from Crows for the ANB trade 

It’s a strong draft.  I would like to see us try to get 3 picks in top 30. 

We need to be bold. 3 picks in the top 20.

 
27 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Ashcroft.

5 becomes 6

I get picks are down graded due F/s picks, but JT and his team would not calculate this into their strategy. Recruiters will make their calculation and strategy with what is in offer,  not with what is not. 
 

Recruiters look at talent coming through many years before the draft. 

10 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

We need to be bold. 3 picks in the top 20.

Not for me DD. This time around, I want scotch fillet, not porterhouse


1 hour ago, Earl Hood said:

I think there is a general consensus on DL that we trust JT to identify young talent, it’s Tim Lamb & Co that are the worry. If the thinking is that the P window is wide open and we need mature top ups, JT may not be getting the early picks. 

The funny thing is I’m sure JT is involved in analysing talent from other sides as well. It’s not like Tim Lamb is just going out there on his own

11 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

The funny thing is I’m sure JT is involved in analysing talent from other sides as well. It’s not like Tim Lamb is just going out there on his own

I wonder who gets the final say?

1 minute ago, Demon Disciple said:

I wonder who gets the final say?

Goody. 🤩. 
 

Now let the pack attack. 

17 minutes ago, Return to Glory said:

Not for me DD. This time around, I want scotch fillet, not porterhouse

Dont bother with the rib-eye, just get as much Kobe wagyu as we can

Can we trade up? Getting another champion midfielder as Trac, Viney and Oliver age is essential. Best we can.


2 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

It might be the greatest junior highlights package I’ve ever seen. It’s bonkers.

But it’s also just highlights, and I have doubts on some of the kicking especially where he loops it to space. That won’t work in afl footy.

Right now I’m saying he could be Ablett Jnr, could be Bailey Laurie! 

He has incredible poise and an ability to weave through traffic. I feel like teams who pass on him may be overthinking about his height or speed not being enough. But if he’s just a natural footballer this won’t be an issue. 

11 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

Dont bother with the rib-eye, just get as much Kobe wagyu as we can

So fatty footballers 🤔

1 minute ago, Rossmillan said:

That future second rounder for McAdam hasn’t aged well has it.

It’s coming home me thinks.

14 minutes ago, Demonsterative said:

It’s coming home me thinks.

I would have preferred it never left. 
If we had 3 second round picks this year (ours, one from the Crows plus the one tied to Sydney), we could bundle it up for a first round pick from a club that needs bidding points. Like say GC or Brisbane. 


Murphy Reid has a lot of Zak Butters traits that are certainly appealing. 

2 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

I would have preferred it never left. 
If we had 3 second round picks this year (ours, one from the Crows plus the one tied to Sydney), we could bundle it up for a first round pick from a club that needs bidding points. Like say GC or Brisbane. 

Call me crazy, I’m still hopeful on McAdam. I hope he gets to the fitness required. 
 

I love ANB and Chandler, but we only need one defensive HFF’er 

4 hours ago, Swooper1987 said:

Don't trade it! With Levi Ashcroft a likely number 1, we will have a choice of one of Jagga Smith, Finn O'Sullivan, Murphy Reid, Harvey Langford, Sid Draper or Josh Smillie.  All should be excellent AFL players.

Harvey Langford the Larke Medallist?

The last time we selected the Larke medallist,we took Cale Morton with pick 4 when Paddy Dangerfield and Cyril Rioli were still available.

 

BP also selected Scully and Trengove at 1 & 2 and the Tigers took Dusty at 3

 

They were the days,LOL

 

Speaking of #5 but did the Petracca thread get deleted??

4 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Speaking of #5 but did the Petracca thread get deleted??

It’s on the trade Board 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 152 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 42 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 327 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies