1 hour ago, DubDee said:

GWS have a deep midfield so i’m not sure they can guarantee that

GWS midfield, or at least their depth is a bit of a myth

Tom Green's the only sure thing through there. Kelly & Cogs are chronically injured, Finn Callaghan plays mostly wing. Plenty of room for Peatling, it'll be the coin that gets him over the line.

5 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

I believe he’s a free agent, but I’m not 100% sure

I don’t think that is correct… or at least he wasn’t on the article showing 2024 free agents on the AFL site

On 14/08/2024 at 12:35, mo64 said:

Peatling is exactly the type of player we should have been pursuing over the past 3 years. Instead Lamb goes after 27yo unwanted players who's best was past them.

Revisionist history?

2 hours ago, adonski said:

GWS midfield, or at least their depth is a bit of a myth

Tom Green's the only sure thing through there. Kelly & Cogs are chronically injured, Finn Callaghan plays mostly wing. Plenty of room for Peatling, it'll be the coin that gets him over the line.

yep fair call. they are not as deep as I thought 

3 hours ago, adonski said:

GWS midfield, or at least their depth is a bit of a myth

Tom Green's the only sure thing through there. Kelly & Cogs are chronically injured, Finn Callaghan plays mostly wing. Plenty of room for Peatling, it'll be the coin that gets him over the line.

I agree, but Bedford seems to be their number 1 tagger and they’ve slowly upped Callaghan’s midfield minutes as he starts to win his own footy. Daniels is starting to play more midfield too.

They might be prepared to sell Peatling at his peak value right now knowing Harry Rowston, James Leake, Conor Stone and others are all ready to come in. 

I don’t have a clue as to Peatling’s value, so I’m guessing, but would this year’s pick 3 plus our future pick two, get Peatling plus Derksen thrown in as the set of steak knives?  (I’m hoping we’ll keep our possible pick 2 (ANB) from Adelaide, with a view to improving our draft hand)

Edited September 18, 20241 yr by hardtack

1 hour ago, hardtack said:

I don’t have a clue as to Peatling’s value, so I’m guessing, but would this year’s pick 3 plus our future pick two, get Peatling plus Derksen thrown in as the set of steak knives? 

You might want to edit that post again hardtack before the Demonland early risers choke on their coffees and assume you're predicting we're going to finish second-last next year and possibly spend our whole current and future draft cache on a pair of fringe players. 

1 hour ago, Skuit said:

You might want to edit that post again hardtack before the Demonland early risers choke on their coffees and assume you're predicting we're going to finish second-last next year and possibly spend our whole current and future draft cache on a pair of fringe players. 

To them I say, “Have at me!!” 🤣 Note that I did post at approx 4:30am, and I am neither in Perth nor a foreign principality, so I can safely say that I plead insanity.

Apparently 6 Victorian clubs into Peatling would good offers.  The Giants increased their deal which was then bettered by some Victorian clubs.  Giants will have to go again !!! 5 year deal likely.  

36 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Apparently 6 Victorian clubs into Peatling would good offers.  The Giants increased their deal which was then bettered by some Victorian clubs.  Giants will have to go again !!! 5 year deal likely.  

Hope we are balls deep into a deal.

Is he worth our 2025 first?

1 minute ago, Moonshadow said:

Hope we are balls deep into a deal.

Is he worth our 2025 first?

If our 2025 first round pick is (1,2,3) 4 or 5, then no 

If our 2025 first round pick is 16, 17 or 18, then yes 

 

2 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Hope we are balls deep into a deal.

Is he worth our 2025 first?

No, even if it's pick 18. Second rounder is his value. He's a similar commodity to Langdon was at trade IMO (pick in the mid 20s).

12 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

If our 2025 first round pick is (1,2,3) 4 or 5, then no 

If our 2025 first round pick is 16, 17 or 18, then yes 

 

It's the gamble every clubs takes. Collingwood [censored] up with F1 for Schultz, we did well including F1st (mid teens pick) for Lever trade.

Personally think it will be around 10 or 11. Does next years draft get screwed by Tassie?

Edited September 22, 20241 yr by Moonshadow

25 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Hope we are balls deep into a deal.

Is he worth our 2025 first?

No chance 

Peatling is not worth a pick under 30.  Unless you're desperate to be seen to be doing something.

Ordinary players become stars at this time of year.

Filth the club rumoured to have the biggest offer

6 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

Filth the club rumoured to have the biggest offer

But can they offer anything to satisfy GWS ? 

1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

But can they offer anything to satisfy GWS ? 

If he's worth as late a draft pick as some are saying, yes

10 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

If he's worth as late a draft pick as some are saying, yes

He is worth A LOT more than that.. Pick somewhere 30-45 this year or 20-35 next year imho

Finals form was solid, which upped the value! Player rating of 9 this year but late he was hitting an avg of 12.3 which is excellent. 16 Coaches Votes this year! 

Edited September 23, 20241 yr by Tolstoys Nudge

1 minute ago, Tolstoys Nudge said:

He is worth A LOT more than that.. Pick somewhere 25-40 this year or 16-35 next year imho

I'd have him somewhere between  1-60 myself

2 minutes ago, adonski said:

I'd have him somewhere between  1-60 myself

Edited my post -- but 1-60 seems solid hahaha

 

Out of Contract but not free agent, so that does push trade value down a little so a third rounder next year could be enough but with bidding war of 6 clubs I'd say a pick this year in 30's but who knows

2 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

But can they offer anything to satisfy GWS ? 

They might be able to swing their Noble pick from GC

13 minutes ago, adonski said:

I'd have him somewhere between  1-60 myself

Astute call

Bookmarked.

Future 2nd round enough to satisfy GWS? 

On 18/09/2024 at 13:48, Dannyz said:

We’re still in this. Offering 4 years. His choice and will decide shortly 

Peatling now has a 5 year deal on the table from someone so this probably won’t be enough