Jump to content

Dan Houston



Recommended Posts

We really are determined to follow Richmond into mediocrity if we make short term list management decisions at the expense of longer term improvements. Just ask them how the Jacob Hopper trade is working out. 

The only way forward for this group is to bring in quality kids with high draft picks. Anything else is Goodwin trying to save his own [censored]. 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
  • Clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, poita said:

We really are determined to follow Richmond into mediocrity if we make short term list management decisions at the expense of longer term improvements. Just ask them how the Jacob Hopper trade is working out. 

The only way forward for this group is to bring in quality kids with high draft picks. Anything else is Goodwin trying to save his own [censored]. 

Firstly Houston is a far better player than Jacob Hopper (or Tim Taranto for that matter)

Secondly our list is in a far better position to contend and far more balanced on age profile than Richmond’s was at the end of 2022

Our only top line players over 30 next year will be Max, May and Viney (TMac and Melksham too if they continue on)

Meanwhile we have the likes of Trac, Oliver, Lever, Fritsch, Langdon and ANB in their prime years

Not to mention a strong cohort of younger players who are starting to become stars in their own right - Kozzy, Rivers, JVR, McVee, Windsor to name a few 

Richmond were super top heavy with all their best players over 30 and nearing the end of their careers, with essentially no top line talent in either the middle or younger age bracket of their list (save for a couple of players like Bolton and Balta)

I get that we need to balance contending with bringing in young talent from the top of the draft, but I think we’re in a far better position to do so than either Richmond or West Coast have been in recent years when they’ve traded away picks to try and keep their windows open with essentially no young talent already on their lists 

Edited by demoncat
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Houston was a free agent, by all means get him. But a running half back/wing is not our most pressing need. Giving up 1st round draft picks for a 27yo, who doesn't move the needle, is poor list management.

If the club genuinely believes we are still in a premiership window, then use draft capital on addressing our obvious needs.  Houston is an upgrade on Hunter and Billings, but that's setting the bar low.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, demoncat said:

Firstly Houston is a far better player than Jacob Hopper (or Tim Taranto for that matter)

Secondly our list is in a far better position to contend and far more balanced on age profile than Richmond’s was at the end of 2022

Our only top line players over 30 next year will be Max, May and Viney (TMac and Melksham too if they continue on)

Meanwhile we have the likes of Trac, Oliver, Lever, Fritsch, Langdon and ANB in their prime years

Not to mention a strong cohort of younger players who are starting to become stars in their own right - Kozzy, Rivers, JVR, McVee, Windsor to name a few 

Richmond were super top heavy with all their best players over 30 and nearing the end of there careers, with essentially no top line talent in either the middle or younger age bracket of their list (save for a couple of players like Bolton Balta)

I get that we need to balance contending with bringing in young talent from the top of the draft, but I think we’re in a far better position to do so than either Richmond or West Coast have been in recent years when they’re traded away picks to try and keep their windows open with essentially no young talent already on their lists 

You lost me when you compared Houston to Taranto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mo64 said:

You lost me when you compared Houston to Taranto.

Yeah pretty sure I’d take a player who is rated the second best kick in the entire comp over a bloke who can get 30 but who butchers every possession  

I thought people have been crying out for us to improve our kicking skills? Now we target someone who would improve us massively in that regard and we shouldn’t ask the question?

Edited by demoncat
  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two first rounders for Houston would be crazy IMO. No doubting his quality as a player but realistically we’d only be getting 2-3 quality seasons out of him before he declines. We also need a bit of rejuvenation on the list with Gawn, May, Lever, Salem and even Trac and Clarry starting to get on the older side of things. I don’t think we should be chips in for a flag anymore, that ship has sailed.

If Houston was 24 and playing the way he is I’d have no qualms with it, but that kind of bounty shouldn’t be wasted on a 28 year old ,unless it was prime Dusty or GAJ.

For comparison we traded a single first rounder, pick 6, for Steven May who was younger and a better player than Houston. In a more important position too. And even THAT was borderline overs, luckily May has been awesome for us. 
 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, poita said:

We really are determined to follow Richmond into mediocrity if we make short term list management decisions at the expense of longer term improvements. Just ask them how the Jacob Hopper trade is working out. 

The only way forward for this group is to bring in quality kids with high draft picks. Anything else is Goodwin trying to save his own [censored]. 

I get your point. We really are at a juncture at the moment. I still think we have a premiership capable team. Despite Gawn's age, he is still at his peak - or close to it. May for me, is the one that is starting to show his age. 

Our midfield isn't old - actually its right where you want it to be to have a crack at a flag. ANB, Trac and Oliver and bang smack in their prime years, Rivers, Kozzy, McVee, Sparrow our young brigade. Windsor a puppy and Lingers still running strong. Viney is likely past his peak, but is still servicable and will give 100%.

So do we shut up shop and do a mini rebuild? Its a real hard one and i change my perspective on this everyday. W

Houston straightens us up and opens up a plethora of options. Frankly Bowey and Salem have been underperforming for a while and i think it shows with our ball movement and rebound. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


31 minutes ago, mo64 said:

If Houston was a free agent, by all means get him. But a running half back/wing is not our most pressing need. Giving up 1st round draft picks for a 27yo, who doesn't move the needle, is poor list management.

If the club genuinely believes we are still in a premiership window, then use draft capital on addressing our obvious needs.  Houston is an upgrade on Hunter and Billings, but that's setting the bar low.

He's rated 2nd best inside 50 kick in the AFL. He's in his absolute prime. I'm on board doing it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bang Bang Bang said:

Two first rounders for Houston would be crazy IMO. No doubting his quality as a player but realistically we’d only be getting 2-3 quality seasons out of him before he declines. We also need a bit of rejuvenation on the list with Gawn, May, Lever, Salem and even Trac and Clarry starting to get on the older side of things. I don’t think we should be chips in for a flag anymore, that ship has sailed.

If Houston was 24 and playing the way he is I’d have no qualms with it, but that kind of bounty shouldn’t be wasted on a 28 year old ,unless it was prime Dusty or GAJ.

For comparison we traded a single first rounder, pick 6, for Steven May who was younger and a better player than Houston. In a more important position too. And even THAT was borderline overs, luckily May has been awesome for us. 

My main concern with the rejuvenation is the arrival of the Tasmanian team. 

We're still in the window now, but we're not leading the pack like we were last few years and lots of teams can  now win the comp. So it would be a risk trading early picks for a player at this peak given whats on the horizon. But with trades like this, you can only judge the success depending on the future outcome.

He'd definitely improve the team though

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, reynolds46 said:

If Houston has made his intentions clear that he wants out, this will become a distraction for Port Adelaide and they should 100% trade him and offer up their first pick to the MFC to get him off their books whilst continuing to pay a large portion of his salary. 

I cannot believe Cornes hasn't suggested this yet.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, mo64 said:

You lost me when you compared Houston to Taranto.

Lol, and I bet you spend half your time complaining we don't have enough good ball users. Houston is an elite kick that could not only play half back, but play through the middle, ie in our midfield, so addresses a direct need.

Taranto, despite being a Melbourne supporter growing up, is a slow player who butchers the ball.

I bet you'd be screaming for us to trade Taranto if he were at Melbourne...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Neil Crompton said:

Which DH “ journalist” initiated the BS that a trade will only get done if we give up 2 first rounders? I’m sure no one at Port said this. 

Jay Clark and the midweek tackle gang on Fox. Likely as their teams  aren’t chasing him.

But he’s ultimately named his destination which like LJ lowers his price somewhat. I think we work closely with Freo to split our pick and stay in the draft this year as best as well can. 
 

Freo are much beater positioned to go with two top 10 picks vs 1 + 2 late first rounders. But I am biased. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, poita said:

We really are determined to follow Richmond into mediocrity if we make short term list management decisions at the expense of longer term improvements. Just ask them how the Jacob Hopper trade is working out. 

The only way forward for this group is to bring in quality kids with high draft picks. Anything else is Goodwin trying to save his own [censored]. 

He would be a fine replacement for Gus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Jay Clark and the midweek tackle gang on Fox. Likely as their teams  aren’t chasing him.

But he’s ultimately named his destination which like LJ lowers his price somewhat. I think we work closely with Freo to split our pick and stay in the draft this year as best as well can. 
 

Freo are much beater positioned to go with two top 10 picks vs 1 + 2 late first rounders. But I am biased. 

The issue is Dan Houston is contracted, whereas Jacko wasn't.

If he is hellbent on leaving then often a club will eventually get the deal done, but there will e a fair bit of haggling in this one I'd say.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

The issue is Dan Houston is contracted, whereas Jacko wasn't.

If he is hellbent on leaving then often a club will eventually get the deal done, but there will e a fair bit of haggling in this one I'd say.

Potentially - i dont recall how Power are on the trade front. We do have a reputation of being easy to deal - no doubt the SA's will try to take advantage of that situation. It would be good for us to have a few options running to minimise the perception of desperation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gawndy the Great said:

Potentially - i dont recall how Power are on the trade front. We do have a reputation of being easy to deal - no doubt the SA's will try to take advantage of that situation. It would be good for us to have a few options running to minimise the perception of desperation. 

I don't think we are easy to deal with, so much as we are happy to pay fair value for a player without haggling over small things.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, demoncat said:

Firstly Houston is a far better player than Jacob Hopper (or Tim Taranto for that matter)

Secondly our list is in a far better position to contend and far more balanced on age profile than Richmond’s was at the end of 2022

Our only top line players over 30 next year will be Max, May and Viney (TMac and Melksham too if they continue on)

Meanwhile we have the likes of Trac, Oliver, Lever, Fritsch, Langdon and ANB in their prime years

Not to mention a strong cohort of younger players who are starting to become stars in their own right - Kozzy, Rivers, JVR, McVee, Windsor to name a few 

Richmond were super top heavy with all their best players over 30 and nearing the end of their careers, with essentially no top line talent in either the middle or younger age bracket of their list (save for a couple of players like Bolton and Balta)

I get that we need to balance contending with bringing in young talent from the top of the draft, but I think we’re in a far better position to do so than either Richmond or West Coast have been in recent years when they’ve traded away picks to try and keep their windows open with essentially no young talent already on their lists 

Excellent summary of the Tiges comparison - none at all really.  Could add in Clarko's faiure to build the hawks on the run - remember Jaeger O'meara anyone.

Our profile is ripe for quality top up in some areas. Just needs to be well managed.

After reading this afternoons Age update on Trac's progress, and the steps are younger players have taken, looking forward to 2025,  and tomorrow night.  I expect to beat Gws,

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Potentially - i dont recall how Power are on the trade front. We do have a reputation of being easy to deal - no doubt the SA's will try to take advantage of that situation. It would be good for us to have a few options running to minimise the perception of desperation. 

I had a quick look at their trade history and there's nothing outlandish and they all seem ok to reasonable trades:

Paid a F2 for Alir (Syd)

Received Pick 12 and a F3 for Pick 16 and Peter Ladhams (Syd)

Paid basically R2 plus late picks for Sweet (Dogs) & P50 (wouldn't have done that one personally but each to their own)

F2 tied to Freo for Soldo (Toiges).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    IN FRONT by Meggs

    In this must-win clash between Melbourne 11th on the ladder and St Kilda 8th, it was the Demons who were in front all day to win in a hard-fought Round 8 clash to make it three in a row to keep theit slim finals chances alive. A good crowd of enthusiastic footy families for week 2 of Pride Round had gathered.  The full pews in the well-appointed RSEA Park grandstand provided excellent viewing.   The Saints won the toss and elected to kick to the southern end favoured by a strong 2-3 g

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons

    THE TRADING CHRONICLES 02

    Part 2: Watching grass grow by Whispering Jack Critics of test cricket (and I’m not one of them) will often claim the sport is excruciatingly boring: that following a five day match is much like watching grass grow. However, the longest form of that game has nothing on the first week of the AFL trade period when it comes to inducing sleep among those in the football public who follows this process in its somnolent moments. The week gone by has been no exception. Only two player trades

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Trade, Draft & Free Agency 1

    THE CAVALRY ARRIVES by Meggs

    The injury plague which has beset the Demons 2024 campaign is finally starting to dissipate and with consecutive wins over GWS Giants and a 2-point nail-biter in Adelade, a sense of optimism is rising.  Some commentators are now asking whether the Dees can make finals? A huge surprise with team selection this week when it was announced that champs Olivia Purcell, Paxy Paxman and Eden Zanker would play.   Hallelujah!  The cavalry has arrived. St Kilda missed the finals last season on pe

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    GOLDIE'S METTLE by Meggs

    On a perfect night for football at the home of the Redlegs, Norwood Oval, it was the visiting underdogs Melbourne who led all night and hung on to prevail in a 2-point nail-biter. In the previous round St Kilda had made it a tough physical game to help restrict Adelaide from scoring and so Mick Stinear set a similar strategy for his team. To win it would require every player to do their bit on the field plus a little bit of luck.  Fifty game milestoner Sinead Goldrick epitomised

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    AFLW Melbourne Demons 1

    2024 Player Reviews: #19 Josh Schache

    Date of Birth: 21 August 1997 Height: 199cm   Games MFC 2024: 1 Career Total: 76   Goals MFC 2024: 0 Career Total: 75     Games CDFC 2024: 12 Goals CDFC 2024: 14   Originally selected to join the Brisbane Lions with the second pick in the 2015 AFL National Draft, Schache moved on to the Western Bulldogs and played in their 2021 defeat to Melbourne where he featured in a handful of games over the past two seasons. Was unable to command a

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 1

    2024 Player Reviews: #21 Matthew Jefferson

    Date of Birth: 8 March 2004 Height: 195cm   Games CDFC 2024: 17 Goals CDFC 2024: 29 The rangy young key forward was a first round pick two years ago is undergoing a long period of training for senior football. There were some promising developments during his season at Casey where he was their top goal kicker and finished third in its best & fairest.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 25

    2024 Player Reviews: #23 Shane McAdam

    Date of Birth: 28 May 1995 Height: 186cm Games MFC 2024: 3 Career Total: 53 Goals MFC 2024: 1 Career Total:  73 Games CDFC 2024: 11 Goals CDFC 2024: 21 Injuries meant a delayed start to his season and, although he showed his athleticism and his speed at times, he was unable to put it all together consistently. Needs to show much more in 2025 and a key will be his fitness.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 51

    2024 Player Reviews: #43 Kyah Farris-White

    Date of Birth: 2 January 2004 Height: 206cm   Games CDFC 2024: 4 Goals CDFC 2024:  1   Farris-White was recruited from basketball as a Category B rookie in the hope of turning him into an AFL quality ruckman but, after two seasons, the experiment failed to bear fruit.  

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 4

    2024 Player Reviews: #44 Luker Kentfield

    Date of Birth: 10 September 2005 Height: 194cm   Games CDFC 2024: 9 Goals CDFC 2024: 5   Drafted from WAFL club Subiaco in this year’s mid season draft, Kentfield was injured when he came to the club and needs a full season to prepare for the rigors of AFL football.  

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 9
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...