Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

it's a difficult one

'sell' the home game as part of a sponsorship agreement with the nt gov and make ~$800k

conversely, have a 'home' game at docklands and lose ~$200k

4 points in a tight season….

 
2 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

no guarantee of wins / losses regardless of location in footy these days

Freo are not a great side in Melbourne 

 
  • Author
5 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

no guarantee of wins / losses regardless of location in footy these days

I think that @Sir Why You Little is also considering the impact of travel to NT vs playing another game in Vic.

8 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Freo are not a great side in Melbourne 

The last two times we've played them at the G, they've beaten us.


  • Author
1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I'm of the opinion that if we lose our next 2 games, then it's curtains for us.

Can't say that I agree.  If we lose the next two games to teams above us but win the last 3 to 4 vs teams below us we will make the 8.  In fact beating the teams below us helps our cause making it harder for them to dislodge us. 

My view of the teams below us and their chances of making the 8:

  • Port on the same W but have to get past Carl, Syd, Dees and Freo.  Low chance
  • Coll and Hawks have incredibly difficult draws and a W behind us.  Very low chance
  • GCS has only two games of 6 at home.  They are also a W behind us. Low chance
  • WBD has the best chance of taking our spot but a W behind us.

So I'm still optimistic of making the 8 but will keep the lid on 😊

 

Edited by Lucifers Hero

30 minutes ago, Binmans PA said:

The last two times we've played them at the G, they've beaten us.

So what?

Are you putting up a White Flag…

Make Teams travel to us, and beat them

The Crowd will come 

12 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So what?

Are you putting up a White Flag…

Make Teams travel to us, and beat them

The Crowd will come 

What if the NT Govt threw in, on top of the approx $800k, a charter flight from Melb to AS, and return, so we could transport a few hundred lucky MFC members (and cheer squad!) to and fro the game? 

Edited by Neil Crompton

 
25 minutes ago, Neil Crompton said:

What if the NT Govt threw in, on top of the approx $800k, a charter flight from Melb to AS, and return, so we could transport a few hundred lucky MFC members (and cheer squad!) to and fro the game? 

It’s not our Home Ground 

We took the deal on during the dark ages to stop the financial bleeding 

It’s now time to stand up and make that $800,000 through other financial streams over 12 months 

it’s gone on too long 

42 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So what?

Are you putting up a White Flag…

Make Teams travel to us, and beat them

The Crowd will come 

No, I'm saying the opposite. We need to stop whinging about every little thing that doesn't go our way, stop playing the victims and get on with it. Fortunately, Goody doesn't play victim, he gets on with it, and tries to plan as best as possible.

I think we're a good travelling side, and extra money is extra money. That said, the way our club tries to fundraise is pretty poor.


Just now, Binmans PA said:

No, I'm saying the opposite. We need to stop whinging about every little thing that doesn't go our way, stop playing the victims and get on with it. Fortunately, Goody doesn't play victim, he gets on with it, and tries to plan as best as possible.

I think we're a good travelling side, and extra money is extra money. That said, the way our club tries to fundraise is pretty poor.

Yes we could do so much more in the Fundraising Department, that is my point 

Other Clubs get 7-8 games at The ‘g in a row 

We still sell off games, that we don’t need to. 
Sure we are a pretty good travelling side, but we shouldn’t do it unnecessarily 

The way we played against Freo last time we would have got smashed if played on the moon

The MCG maybe only a 70pt loss.

17 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

If a 6 goal loss is a 'sprinkle' of mfcss, I'd hate to see what a 'full serve' of mfcss would result in ... 🙄

image.png.036f9a52e530a1365b91703786f39344.png

You asked.

2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

We still shouldn’t be selling home games in 2024

Agree but we need the money... it's a relatively neutral ground and we avoid the Suns in Darwin.

The rain last Saturday night killed what should have been a big crowd/pay day for a home game against Essendon

17 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Agree but we need the money... it's a relatively neutral ground and we avoid the Suns in Darwin.

The rain last Saturday night killed what should have been a big crowd/pay day for a home game against Essendon

All Clubs need money, i am not disputing that, but in my opinion we give that game away too easily.
Over a period of 12 months there is no reason why $800,000 cannot be generated by a Club with 70,000 members, we need to become more innovative. 
and we need to contest that 4 points in Melbourne 

Edited by Sir Why You Little


2 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

it's a difficult one

'sell' the home game as part of a sponsorship agreement with the nt gov and make ~$800k

conversely, have a 'home' game at docklands and lose ~$200k

The head says that we should keep the NT game due to the money on offer.

The heart says play the home game at Marvel as 15,000 - 18,000 MFC fans can attend and create a genuine home ground advantage as opposed to the neutralised crowd at Alice. In fact I'd venture to say we get out numbered most game in Alice. 

 

 

2 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Can't say that I agree.  If we lose the next two games to teams above us but win the last 3 to 4 vs teams below us we will make the 8.  In fact beating the teams below us helps our cause making it harder for them to dislodge us. 

My view of the teams below us and their chances of making the 8:

  • Port on the same W but have to get past Carl, Syd, Dees and Freo.  Low chance
  • Coll and Hawks have incredibly difficult draws and a W behind us.  Very low chance
  • GCS has only two games of 6 at home.  They are also a W behind us. Low chance
  • WBD has the best chance of taking our spot but a W behind us.

So I'm still optimistic of making the 8 but will keep the lid on 😊

 

Fair points, but you'd suspect the air in the tyres will be deflated if we drop the next 2.

2 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

The head says that we should keep the NT game due to the money on offer.

The heart says play the home game at Marvel as 15,000 - 18,000 MFC fans can attend and create a genuine home ground advantage as opposed to the neutralised crowd at Alice. In fact I'd venture to say we get out numbered most game in Alice.

yah this is me too

5 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Hahahahah! I think I've found my new favourite poster.

You’re in good company. Two peas in a pod. 

These are for your new boyfriend who doesn’t like my use of ‘childish emojies’ [sic]
 

🤮👎🏽🤦‍♀️🥷👋👺☠️👹😵‍💫👿🫥🤤

😘

1 hour ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

You’re in good company. Two peas in a pod. 

These are for your new boyfriend who doesn’t like my use of ‘childish emojies’ [sic]
 

🤮👎🏽🤦‍♀️🥷👋👺☠️👹😵‍💫👿🫥🤤

😘

So we're making assumptions and mockery of people's sexuality now are? 

You're low act. Glad we're seeing your true colours as always.

Edited by dazzledavey36


On 17/07/2024 at 23:12, JJR said:

Screenshot_20240717-230534.thumb.png.6058d5c1390d25174e500badb65a9ad1.png

Not related to the thread, but did this bloke really ride his bike home after an AFL game 🤣

He lives in Fitzroy JJR. I've seen him ride past the Pullman whilst having a beer in there one game day.  

The Port V Richmond game could be an issue.

Richmond are bringing over a VFL side which reeks of a percentage booster for Port.

A 70 point win to Port takes their percentage from 104 to 108, while ours is at 105.

2 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

The Port V Richmond game could be an issue.

Richmond are bringing over a VFL side which reeks of a percentage booster for Port.

A 70 point win to Port takes their percentage from 104 to 108, while ours is at 105.

Agree.

And there will mutiple games from now on where contenders are playing teams who are def out of the finals race who have put the cue in the rack.

 
4 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

The Port V Richmond game could be an issue.

Richmond are bringing over a VFL side which reeks of a percentage booster for Port.

A 70 point win to Port takes their percentage from 104 to 108, while ours is at 105.

Most of the finals contenders have at least one game left against a bottom 5 side. They’re all issues for us, unfortunately.

22 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Most of the finals contenders have at least one game left against a bottom 5 side. They’re all issues for us, unfortunately.

Simple win ALL or 5 games and we make Top 4 or enough (3 or 4 )Top8.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    When looking back at the disastrous end to the game, I find it a waste of time to concentrate on the final few moments when utter confusion reigned. Forget the 6-6-6 mess, the failure to mark the most dangerous man on the field, the inability to seal the game when opportunities presented themselves to Clayton Oliver, Harry Petty and Charlie Spargo, the vision of match winning players of recent weeks in Kozzy Pickett and Jake Melksham spending helpless minutes on the interchange bench and the powerlessness of seizing the opportunity to slow the tempo of the game down in those final moments.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sandringham

    The Casey Demons rebounded from a sluggish start to manufacture a decisive win against Sandringham in the final showdown, culminating a quarter century of intense rivalry between the fluctuating alignments of teams affiliated with AFL clubs Melbourne and St Kilda, as the Saints and the Zebras prepare to forge independent paths in 2026. After conceding three of the first four goals of the match, the Demons went on a goal kicking rampage instigated by the winning ruck combination of Tom Campbell with 26 hitouts, 26 disposals and 13 clearances and his apprentice Will Verrall who contributed 20 hitouts. This gave first use of the ball to the likes of Jack Billings, Bayley Laurie, Riley Bonner and Koltyn Tholstrup who was impressive early. By the first break they had added seven goals and took a strong grip on the game. The Demons were well served up forward early by Mitch Hardie and, as the game progressed, Harry Sharp proved a menace with a five goal performance. Emerging young forwards Matthew Jefferson and Luker Kentfield kicked two each but the former let himself down with some poor kicking for goal.
    Young draft talent Will Duursma showed the depth of his talent and looks well out of reach for Melbourne this year. Kalani White was used sparingly and had a brief but uneventful stint in the ruck.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons return to the scene of the crime on Saturday to face the wooden spooners the Eagles at the Docklands. Who comes in and who goes out? Like moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

    • 76 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    This season cannot end soon enough. Disgraceful.

    • 470 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Kozzy Pickett, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 25 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

      • Like
    • 566 replies