Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

it's a difficult one

'sell' the home game as part of a sponsorship agreement with the nt gov and make ~$800k

conversely, have a 'home' game at docklands and lose ~$200k

4 points in a tight season….

 
2 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

no guarantee of wins / losses regardless of location in footy these days

Freo are not a great side in Melbourne 

 
  • Author
5 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

no guarantee of wins / losses regardless of location in footy these days

I think that @Sir Why You Little is also considering the impact of travel to NT vs playing another game in Vic.

8 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Freo are not a great side in Melbourne 

The last two times we've played them at the G, they've beaten us.


  • Author
1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I'm of the opinion that if we lose our next 2 games, then it's curtains for us.

Can't say that I agree.  If we lose the next two games to teams above us but win the last 3 to 4 vs teams below us we will make the 8.  In fact beating the teams below us helps our cause making it harder for them to dislodge us. 

My view of the teams below us and their chances of making the 8:

  • Port on the same W but have to get past Carl, Syd, Dees and Freo.  Low chance
  • Coll and Hawks have incredibly difficult draws and a W behind us.  Very low chance
  • GCS has only two games of 6 at home.  They are also a W behind us. Low chance
  • WBD has the best chance of taking our spot but a W behind us.

So I'm still optimistic of making the 8 but will keep the lid on 😊

 

Edited by Lucifers Hero

30 minutes ago, Binmans PA said:

The last two times we've played them at the G, they've beaten us.

So what?

Are you putting up a White Flag…

Make Teams travel to us, and beat them

The Crowd will come 

12 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So what?

Are you putting up a White Flag…

Make Teams travel to us, and beat them

The Crowd will come 

What if the NT Govt threw in, on top of the approx $800k, a charter flight from Melb to AS, and return, so we could transport a few hundred lucky MFC members (and cheer squad!) to and fro the game? 

Edited by Neil Crompton

 
25 minutes ago, Neil Crompton said:

What if the NT Govt threw in, on top of the approx $800k, a charter flight from Melb to AS, and return, so we could transport a few hundred lucky MFC members (and cheer squad!) to and fro the game? 

It’s not our Home Ground 

We took the deal on during the dark ages to stop the financial bleeding 

It’s now time to stand up and make that $800,000 through other financial streams over 12 months 

it’s gone on too long 

42 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So what?

Are you putting up a White Flag…

Make Teams travel to us, and beat them

The Crowd will come 

No, I'm saying the opposite. We need to stop whinging about every little thing that doesn't go our way, stop playing the victims and get on with it. Fortunately, Goody doesn't play victim, he gets on with it, and tries to plan as best as possible.

I think we're a good travelling side, and extra money is extra money. That said, the way our club tries to fundraise is pretty poor.


Just now, Binmans PA said:

No, I'm saying the opposite. We need to stop whinging about every little thing that doesn't go our way, stop playing the victims and get on with it. Fortunately, Goody doesn't play victim, he gets on with it, and tries to plan as best as possible.

I think we're a good travelling side, and extra money is extra money. That said, the way our club tries to fundraise is pretty poor.

Yes we could do so much more in the Fundraising Department, that is my point 

Other Clubs get 7-8 games at The ‘g in a row 

We still sell off games, that we don’t need to. 
Sure we are a pretty good travelling side, but we shouldn’t do it unnecessarily 

The way we played against Freo last time we would have got smashed if played on the moon

The MCG maybe only a 70pt loss.

17 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

If a 6 goal loss is a 'sprinkle' of mfcss, I'd hate to see what a 'full serve' of mfcss would result in ... 🙄

image.png.036f9a52e530a1365b91703786f39344.png

You asked.

2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

We still shouldn’t be selling home games in 2024

Agree but we need the money... it's a relatively neutral ground and we avoid the Suns in Darwin.

The rain last Saturday night killed what should have been a big crowd/pay day for a home game against Essendon

17 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Agree but we need the money... it's a relatively neutral ground and we avoid the Suns in Darwin.

The rain last Saturday night killed what should have been a big crowd/pay day for a home game against Essendon

All Clubs need money, i am not disputing that, but in my opinion we give that game away too easily.
Over a period of 12 months there is no reason why $800,000 cannot be generated by a Club with 70,000 members, we need to become more innovative. 
and we need to contest that 4 points in Melbourne 

Edited by Sir Why You Little


2 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

it's a difficult one

'sell' the home game as part of a sponsorship agreement with the nt gov and make ~$800k

conversely, have a 'home' game at docklands and lose ~$200k

The head says that we should keep the NT game due to the money on offer.

The heart says play the home game at Marvel as 15,000 - 18,000 MFC fans can attend and create a genuine home ground advantage as opposed to the neutralised crowd at Alice. In fact I'd venture to say we get out numbered most game in Alice. 

 

 

2 hours ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Can't say that I agree.  If we lose the next two games to teams above us but win the last 3 to 4 vs teams below us we will make the 8.  In fact beating the teams below us helps our cause making it harder for them to dislodge us. 

My view of the teams below us and their chances of making the 8:

  • Port on the same W but have to get past Carl, Syd, Dees and Freo.  Low chance
  • Coll and Hawks have incredibly difficult draws and a W behind us.  Very low chance
  • GCS has only two games of 6 at home.  They are also a W behind us. Low chance
  • WBD has the best chance of taking our spot but a W behind us.

So I'm still optimistic of making the 8 but will keep the lid on 😊

 

Fair points, but you'd suspect the air in the tyres will be deflated if we drop the next 2.

2 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

The head says that we should keep the NT game due to the money on offer.

The heart says play the home game at Marvel as 15,000 - 18,000 MFC fans can attend and create a genuine home ground advantage as opposed to the neutralised crowd at Alice. In fact I'd venture to say we get out numbered most game in Alice.

yah this is me too

5 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Hahahahah! I think I've found my new favourite poster.

You’re in good company. Two peas in a pod. 

These are for your new boyfriend who doesn’t like my use of ‘childish emojies’ [sic]
 

🤮👎🏽🤦‍♀️🥷👋👺☠️👹😵‍💫👿🫥🤤

😘

1 hour ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

You’re in good company. Two peas in a pod. 

These are for your new boyfriend who doesn’t like my use of ‘childish emojies’ [sic]
 

🤮👎🏽🤦‍♀️🥷👋👺☠️👹😵‍💫👿🫥🤤

😘

So we're making assumptions and mockery of people's sexuality now are? 

You're low act. Glad we're seeing your true colours as always.

Edited by dazzledavey36


On 17/07/2024 at 23:12, JJR said:

Screenshot_20240717-230534.thumb.png.6058d5c1390d25174e500badb65a9ad1.png

Not related to the thread, but did this bloke really ride his bike home after an AFL game 🤣

He lives in Fitzroy JJR. I've seen him ride past the Pullman whilst having a beer in there one game day.  

The Port V Richmond game could be an issue.

Richmond are bringing over a VFL side which reeks of a percentage booster for Port.

A 70 point win to Port takes their percentage from 104 to 108, while ours is at 105.

2 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

The Port V Richmond game could be an issue.

Richmond are bringing over a VFL side which reeks of a percentage booster for Port.

A 70 point win to Port takes their percentage from 104 to 108, while ours is at 105.

Agree.

And there will mutiple games from now on where contenders are playing teams who are def out of the finals race who have put the cue in the rack.

 
4 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

The Port V Richmond game could be an issue.

Richmond are bringing over a VFL side which reeks of a percentage booster for Port.

A 70 point win to Port takes their percentage from 104 to 108, while ours is at 105.

Most of the finals contenders have at least one game left against a bottom 5 side. They’re all issues for us, unfortunately.

22 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Most of the finals contenders have at least one game left against a bottom 5 side. They’re all issues for us, unfortunately.

Simple win ALL or 5 games and we make Top 4 or enough (3 or 4 )Top8.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 151 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 42 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 327 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies