Jump to content

Featured Replies

It's funny because I've just looked at the stats and seen Rivers had 25 touches and 6 clearances of 70%+ TOG, plus a goal. You look at those numbers and you go, he is definitely on the way.

But whenever he's in traffic under heat, he makes poor decisions IMO. 

When he has the play in front of him, it's a different story. He's explosive and confident, and tries to play make.

Anyway, I hope I'm wrong.

 
1 minute ago, Binmans PA said:

But whenever he's in traffic under heat, he makes poor decisions IMO. 

When he has the play in front of him, it's a different story. He's explosive and confident, and tries to play make.

Anyway, I hope I'm wrong.

Have thought similar myself but thought he was excellent in traffic in the 4thQ (possibly to do with Libba sat on the bench)

49 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

They wont let him go. His next contract will be $1mill+ per year over 5 years

Agree that it is highly unlikely they'll let him go but that contract I'd do in a heartbeat.  Exactly what we need and in time with the CBA that won't be a huge number. If we can I'd offer more.

 

I don't care about the names, I just want us to pick up via trades, free agents, drafting the following positions, midfielder midfielder midfielder ruckman forward  defefender midfielder.

Just wondering.  With the apparent mass exodus of Richmond players it would appear that Baker and Bolton would garner Band one compensation. If Richmond lose today and likely finish last does this mean that they will secure picks 1, 2 & 3 in the draft? (exempting Ashcroft). I sincerely hope not!


4 minutes ago, Deelectable said:

Just wondering.  With the apparent mass exodus of Richmond players it would appear that Baker and Bolton would garner Band one compensation. If Richmond lose today and likely finish last does this mean that they will secure picks 1, 2 & 3 in the draft? (exempting Ashcroft). I sincerely hope not!

Neither Baker or Bolton are free agents, so no compo picks, they'll be traded for as per normal

Edited by adonski

12 hours ago, Deelectable said:

Agree that it is highly unlikely they'll let him go but that contract I'd do in a heartbeat.  Exactly what we need and in time with the CBA that won't be a huge number. If we can I'd offer more.

For a guy who's played 12 good games over his career

17 minutes ago, adonski said:

Neither Baker or Bolton are free agents, so no compo picks, they'll be traded for as per normal

Oh,of course. Thank you. So it's just Josh Battle to be concerned about unless of course we finish lower than StKilda.

 

Correct, although given the new CBA and the adjusted compensation rules announced during the week (length of contract to be factored in to compo, but capped @ 5 years along with avg guaranteed money over life of contract) the hill for band one compo for Battle looks very steep now.

 

35 minutes ago, ChaserJ said:

Correct, although given the new CBA and the adjusted compensation rules announced during the week (length of contract to be factored in to compo, but capped @ 5 years along with avg guaranteed money over life of contract) the hill for band one compo for Battle looks very steep now.

 

Good to hear. With the exception of Ashcroft to the Lions and possibly Lombard to the Suns we're looking at a top 8 selection at least. Plethora of quality mids available is exciting. Most interesting off season ahead with seemingly a mass exodus of our players. Brown, Schache, Hunter, Tomlinson, Melksham, TMac, Sestan , Brayshaw and Smith all likely off the list. Unfortunately we're saddled with Billings and Fullarton. Very interesting October ahead.


15 hours ago, Binmans PA said:

It's funny because I've just looked at the stats and seen Rivers had 25 touches and 6 clearances of 70%+ TOG, plus a goal. You look at those numbers and you go, he is definitely on the way.

But whenever he's in traffic under heat, he makes poor decisions IMO. 

When he has the play in front of him, it's a different story. He's explosive and confident, and tries to play make.

Anyway, I hope I'm wrong.

He’s still learning the mid role I think. He has the physical gifts to be similar to a Chad Warner I believe. Hope the club keep backing him.

I've said it before and will say again, we need to recruit players from other clubs and/or the draft that have pace and the necessary skills. Other than the Royal Windsor our newbies are really just good old-fashioned goers. Being up in Qld I have not seen Jeffo, Adams or Sestan as it seems, they are about the only ones in the two's that could have the skills to make it. We are getting killed by teams with pace and skills to deliver correctly. Not all lost as JVR, Windsor, McVee and Rivers will keep improving and be very good players for us.

3 hours ago, Deelectable said:

Just wondering.  With the apparent mass exodus of Richmond players it would appear that Baker and Bolton would garner Band one compensation. If Richmond lose today and likely finish last does this mean that they will secure picks 1, 2 & 3 in the draft? (exempting Ashcroft). I sincerely hope not!

Bolton isn’t leaving.

16 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Bolton isn’t leaving.

He’s the one you should be trading. Doesn’t care, body language is terrible, he’s a great player in a good side and Richmond won’t be that for a long time. Get two firsts for him now or watch him meander around for another 12 months until he asks for a trade again and the value’s dropped

18 hours ago, chook fowler said:

Dean Cox as coach 

Dean Cucks wants to be in Sydney next to Longmire until he retires. Won't ever be a senior coach if thats his mindset imo. 

Edited by John Demonic


17 hours ago, Binmans PA said:

It's funny because I've just looked at the stats and seen Rivers had 25 touches and 6 clearances of 70%+ TOG, plus a goal. You look at those numbers and you go, he is definitely on the way.

But whenever he's in traffic under heat, he makes poor decisions IMO. 

When he has the play in front of him, it's a different story. He's explosive and confident, and tries to play make.

Anyway, I hope I'm wrong.

Rivers tries to do too much at times especially early in games, but he gets stronger the longer games go - at least down back. In the midfield he’s clearly tired in second halves.

But with so little chemistry and class in our midfield and no trust in the forward line it’s not easy to make decisions. Tracc and Oliver refined their combination. Who is Rivers meant to combine with right now? Gawn can’t move, Oliver is a mess and Viney doesn’t have his burst. 

As long as Rivers builds his tank I have no concerns about his midfield quality.

Coming into the season the club were really happy that Riv had gotten his running up to the point where he could play some midfield minutes.

Necessity has meant he’s had more time through there than expected, but hopefully he has a real taste for centre square minutes now and really attacks the preseason to build that running capacity further.

As it would seem unlikely there will be many, if any, gettable ‘big name’ key position forwards up for trade, is Adelaide’s Riley Thilthorpe a player that could be lured away if targeted? I’ve liked what I have seen of him, even though I haven’t seen a lot.  A great forward target with a very good pair of hands.


BTW Is there any way to search within the topic you’re currently viewing (it could save me asking questions that have already been answered)?

Edited by hardtack

3 hours ago, FrothiesLiam said:

If Goldstein plays on at the bombers we should look at Nick Bryan from the bombers

Playing pretty well against Darcy and Jackson in the ruck.


20 minutes ago, hardtack said:

As it would seem unlikely there will be many, if any, gettable ‘big name’ key position forwards up for trade, is Adelaide’s Riley Thilthorpe a player that could be lured away if targeted? I’ve liked what I have seen of him, even though I haven’t seen a lot.  A great forward target with a very good pair of hands.


BTW Is there any way to search within the topic you’re currently viewing (it could save me asking questions that have already been answered)?

Highly doubt it

If we're having a crack at Houston, we must be loading up for one last go with we have May, Gawn, Viney running around

If that's the case...welcome to Melbourne, Jack Macrae

1 hour ago, hardtack said:

As it would seem unlikely there will be many, if any, gettable ‘big name’ key position forwards up for trade, is Adelaide’s Riley Thilthorpe a player that could be lured away if targeted? I’ve liked what I have seen of him, even though I haven’t seen a lot.  A great forward target with a very good pair of hands.


BTW Is there any way to search within the topic you’re currently viewing (it could save me asking questions that have already been answered)?

The little bit of Riley you have seen must be the little bit I haven’t seen 

 
On 03/08/2024 at 14:31, Deelectable said:

Good to hear. With the exception of Ashcroft to the Lions and possibly Lombard to the Suns we're looking at a top 8 selection at least. Plethora of quality mids available is exciting. Most interesting off season ahead with seemingly a mass exodus of our players. Brown, Schache, Hunter, Tomlinson, Melksham, TMac, Sestan , Brayshaw and Smith all likely off the list. Unfortunately we're saddled with Billings and Fullarton. Very interesting October ahead.

Really hope you're right about the compo the Saints will receive for Josh Battle.  He's certainly out the door after that performance. Don't want to be shunted back a spot in the draft.

2 hours ago, adonski said:

If we're having a crack at Houston, we must be loading up for one last go with we have May, Gawn, Viney running around

If that's the case...welcome to Melbourne, Jack Macrae

That's a very good call if that's the way we go.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 94 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 358 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 47 replies