Jump to content

Featured Replies

5 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Webster is [censored] . Minimum a month holiday 

That was worse than Powell-Pepper’s hit. He should get a minimum of 5 weeks 

 
50 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Webster is [censored] . Minimum a month holiday 

It's almost a replica of the Maynard Assault.

59 minutes ago, alpha33 said:

That was worse than Powell-Pepper’s hit. He should get a minimum of 5 weeks 

I thought P-P was stiff. A Port player turned the poor Crow dude directly into P-P's path...P-P never left the ground with the intention to thump....

Edited by Monbon

 

 
5 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

It’s hard to argue with that. His only intention was the upper body and he jumped off the ground. These things happen quickly but they are an eternity to these guys.

Simpkin was distressed with concussion symptoms immediately from the vision.

What are we doing here? The week after a bloke is medically retired due to hits to the head.

What is the game about? 

i don't think it's going to be 10, but it should start at 6

in other concussion news, will pucovski was sconned second ball of his innings down in tasmania

he needs to be brayshaw'd and medically retired from sport where there's a chance of his head being hit


8 weeks for Webster.

FFS. That is everything we can’t have in the game.

Make him miss two months of footy and he, and others, might finally learn.

We would be en-[censored]-raged if that happened to one of our players. 

49 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Enlighten me then, o wise and holy one.

Actually was gonna ask you to settle a debate of sorts between me and another DL-er. He thinks you’re referring to a certain incident and I think you’re referring to a different incident.

Incidentally, I’m very often NOT in the dark as you put it. No, I’m very often across things that aren’t public knowledge, just as you seem to be, or at least, you imply you are. Difference is I choose not to hint at things, or let everyone know that I know something they don’t know.

If you can’t explain why Harmes is a bad boy, perhaps @dazzledavey36 can; I see he gave your post a thumbs up. 

Please do not drag me into your guys high school gossip [censored].

Prefer to talk footy thanks.

Sort it over a DM you two.

Edited by dazzledavey36

5 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

8 weeks for Webster.

FFS. That is everything we can’t have in the game.

Make him miss two months of footy and he, and others, might finally learn.

We would be en-[censored]-raged if that happened to one of our players. 

If the AFL want to make a statement on a head high bump then this is the perfect case study right here with this incident.

You'd think 6 weeks at least is a starting point.


They’ll throw the book at Webster. Very dangerous and very dumb. 

6 weeks unless they are 'mates' and played junior footy together then.....

48 minutes ago, rpfc said:

It’s hard to argue with that. His only intention was the upper body and he jumped off the ground. These things happen quickly but they are an eternity to these guys.

Simpkin was distressed with concussion symptoms immediately from the vision.

What are we doing here? The week after a bloke is medically retired due to hits to the head.

What is the game about? 

We will soon find out.

Pp was dealt with properly although I'm not sure why they deliberated so long for.

I hope this is sorted out pronto.

Keep handing out minimum four week bans and players will soon start to behave.

This warrants more than four for me. ( As was the Maynard hit).

 

12 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

You'd think 6 weeks at least is a starting point.

For sure. However,  take the red from their guernsey and I wouldn't be so confident.  😠


43 minutes ago, Jontee said:

6 weeks unless they are 'mates' and played junior footy together then.....

webster just sighted with box of chocolates heading into florist ...

1 hour ago, Monbon said:

It's almost a replica of the Maynard Assault.

It’s actually a replica of the Cripps hit which concussed his victim and put him out of the finals.

Cripps’ penalty, a Brownlow.

 

What is a webster thinking??

in a practice match?

The Saints always shoot thenselves in the foot

1 hour ago, Monbon said:

It's almost a replica of the Maynard Assault.

Blood oath it was. Webster can hardly be expected to avoid a collision when he's left the ground. He's like a frisbee with arms and legs. And Simpkin's momentum after kicking carried him in the direction of Webster, so it's all on him, really. I'm sure a few QCs arguing for 5 hours that up is down will sort this out amicably, with Webster being cleared.

 

1 hour ago, Demonland said:

 

Oh.

NOW you're asking for multiple weeks for a head high collision.

Well, I suppose it's never too late. (Unless you're Angus Brayshaw.)


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 28 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 60 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 22 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Vomit
      • Sad
      • Like
    • 252 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland