Jump to content

Featured Replies

16 hours ago, SPC said:

Gus is not the answer to our problems- he is not dynamic. Like others I think Rivers needs more midfield time, especially now that Salem is back. Bowey, Sparrow and Koz are our best 3rd rotation option. I don’t like Viney and Oliver in the same centre square setup. 
We will certainly need to improve in this area in the draft. Need 2 taller, inside/outside mids with pace and ball use. We could have addressed this in the 2021 draft, but went a bit smaller in Bowey and Laurie (Bowey is a find, but more half back). They are not the right size for extended clearance minutes.

Bevo  has switched Caleb Daniels to midfield nearly BOG agsin in last 2 rounds.

Size never stops sports people unless it's a complete mismatch but it's generally ability that restricts ones output. 

 
On 5/19/2023 at 11:47 PM, dee-tox said:

I want a six foot two, hard running guy with outside skills that can complement Oliver, Viney and Tracc.

We don't have enough classy users on the outside. Sparrow, Jordon, ANB, Rivers, Brayshaw, etc don't do it for me. Kozzie has potential but can't get the pill

On the money. The team overall is a touch dour.

21 hours ago, jnrmac said:

Don't think Tracc had a CBA in the first half. He was the catalyst for our 3rd qtr run though in the middle

It has bothered me for some time that Clarry spends way too much time wrestling with opponents at the Centre bounces. Great player that I love to watch but its a part of his game that frustrates the hell out of me 

Been thinking about this for a while now, with the opposition likely trying to block/ tag 1 or 2 of our players at centre bounce standing there wrestling with them just make it so easy for them, why don't they get on the move and move to the position they want just as the hit out is occurring, playing into their hands just standing and wrestling even if they're first to the ball they get tackled straight away.

 

No excuses but a 6 day break followed by travel and a wet night can't be easy running. 

Did anyone see the vision of how Collingwood form lines when they have the ball, meaning players always know where a teammate is likely to be. Reminds me of the Hawks back when they dominated in the 80's. Not actually that hard to counter if we're on the ball.


56 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

Did anyone see the vision of how Collingwood form lines when they have the ball, meaning players always know where a teammate is likely to be. Reminds me of the Hawks back when they dominated in the 80's. Not actually that hard to counter if we're on the ball.

You had me at Collingwood and lines

Goody’s key pillars of contest and defence are failing miserably this year.

Getting killed in clearances and all at sea when defending. This is 100% an attitude problem from both the playing and coaching group. Are they too proud to admit it to themselves? Or simply too arrogant to believe that it simply is not the case?

Thankfully we still have time to right the ship, because this isn’t something that can simply be turned on like a light switch.  A team like ours needs belief, confidence and momentum for it to be sustained.

The positive is that we are 7-3 and havent really got going yet. The negative is that we are 10 rounds in and have yet to get going.

Edited by Demon Disciple

4 minutes ago, Demon Disciple said:

Goody’s key pillars of contest and defence are failing miserably this year.

Getting killed in clearances and all at sea when defending. This is 100% an attitude problem from both the playing and coaching group. Are they too proud to admit it to themselves? Or simply too arrogant to believe that it simply is not the case?

Thankfully we still have time to right the ship, because this isn’t something that can simply be turned on like a light switch.  A team like ours needs belief, confidence and momentum for it to be sustained.

The positive is that we are 7-3 and havent really got going yet. The negative is that we are 10 rounds in and have yet to get going.

If it’s attitude, it’s not an immediate fix, this stuff is ingrained and built up over time so that you don’t flinch at the slightest hiccup. 

We wilted when Port responded in Q4.

 

 
11 hours ago, Gawndy the Great said:

If it’s attitude, it’s not an immediate fix, this stuff is ingrained and built up over time so that you don’t flinch at the slightest hiccup. 

We wilted when Port responded in Q4.

 

I just thought of something, we've been super accurate this year and it's been great to watch.

However at this point of the season, would people have preferred us to be like the previous few years of inaccuracy in front of goal but a consistent level of intensity/effort OR be generally accurate in front of goal but put out those 3 honker performances and times where it has looked like we've picked when to go. 

No right or wrong answer and probably a silly question but just a little Tuesday morning brain candy. 

We need to trial 

Rivers (explosive)

Salem (class and composure)

& Bowey (class & speed) through the midfield 

NFI if it'll actually work, but the mids we have after the big three aren't good enough and lack any point of difference 


Just now, adonski said:

We need to trial 

Rivers (explosive)

Salem (class and composure)

& Bowey (class & speed) through the midfield 

NFI if it'll actually work, but the mids we have after the big three aren't good enough and lack any point of difference 

I'd be happy to see even run of those run through there this week. Need a new edge. 

Strange to say, but I think Oliver’s injury should see a much more dynamic and proactive Sparrow in the mid. I think he tends to hold back to allow Oliver to do his thing, so I think more responsibility at the clearances will likely see his game evolve.

2 hours ago, adonski said:

We need to trial 

Rivers (explosive)

Salem (class and composure)

& Bowey (class & speed) through the midfield 

NFI if it'll actually work, but the mids we have after the big three aren't good enough and lack any point of difference 

Rivers is a decent shout but actual centre square craft takes a long time to learn. 

Personally I'd be more comfortable with Harmes, Dunstan (in a week or two) and Jordon covering the gap. 

48 minutes ago, Dannyz said:

Rivers is a decent shout but actual centre square craft takes a long time to learn. 

Personally I'd be more comfortable with Harmes, Dunstan (in a week or two) and Jordon covering the gap. 

Like to 2nd that

CBAs will be the more difficult aspect to cover with Clarry out.  We don't have another obvious *bull/extractor who'll give us first us bar Dunstan unless he's over his injury which seems unlikely.

*The others being mooted are all triers but not really near the level and/or more inside/outside types.

Around the ground ball ups should be fine assuming our set ups and ruck/on baller cohesion at ball ups are adjusted vs Sat night and those asked to do the job really step things up.

Edited by Demon Dynasty

16 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Like to 2nd that

CBAs will be the more difficult aspect to cover with Clarry out.  We don't have another obvious *bull/extractor who'll give us first us bar Dunstan unless he's over his injury which seems unlikely.

*The others being mooted are all triers but not really near the level and/or more inside/outside types.

Around the ground ball ups should be fine assuming our set ups and ruck/on baller cohesion at ball ups are adjusted vs Sat night and those asked to do the job really step things up.

Well we have been getting beaten at CBA of late so don’t see why cannot try a few new things out. 


Collingwood's tactics can be summed up by the old military maxim: get there first with the most.

11 minutes ago, Tony Tea said:

Collingwood's tactics can be summed up by the old military maxim: get there first with the most.

Melbourne supporters would call it bees to the honey pot...

Edited by A F

2 hours ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Well we have been getting beaten at CBA of late so don’t see why cannot try a few new things out. 

Yes hence why i seconded the Rivers idea although i don't see him as a direct replacement for Clarry as such.  More just to see what he might add at CBs.

Would love to see Dunstan get a run for Clarry over a short block to see where he's at.

Not saying he's the answer either but imv he's the closest bull / extractor we've got (to Clarry/Viney) and one of the best distributors by hand at the club with VG vision in traffic (sees things out wide and goes there more often than some of the other insiders like Clarry, Viney, Sparrow & JJ).

Might bring the likes of Lingers/Hunter into play a little more often, changing lanes & giving the forwards a few extra decent looks vs our usual straight ahead bang it in style which is a bit predictable & fairly easy to defend.

Not sure how he'd go outside of CB with kicking etc. but worth trialling while Clarry is out.

If we give him a block of games now so he can get up to speed/demand of AFL level again, find some confidence there.

Better now than last minute late in the season if one of Viney or Clarry happened to go down.

Of course all that would be outcomes based.  He might also flop badly.

Edited by Demon Dynasty

On 5/21/2023 at 7:18 AM, dazzledavey36 said:

But but the sacrifice running??? 

He played at Casey yesterday mate lol......

Lol

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 138 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 423 replies