Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, Dannyz said:

I think Salem will play AFL

An informed thought?

 
6 minutes ago, binman said:

And with the ridiculously sky high rents acrross Australia, no chance of living rent free in opponents' heads.

Dogs paying Melbourne at least $900 a week at this stage

16 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

Dogs paying Melbourne at least $900 a week at this stage

And that's just for Hunter's contract!

 
On 5/13/2023 at 9:11 PM, Demons11 said:

We are the highest scoring team in the comp, I think our forward line is working pretty well 

I couldn't agree more, I keep reading our forward line isn't working properly yet when you're the highest scoring team in the comp you'd think we're doing something better than all other teams. 

1 hour ago, binman said:

An informed thought?

Probably making assumptions going by Goodwin's presser.

I did find it strange that he didn't rule it out when asked. I thought the answer would simply be that he will come through the VFL but made it sound possible of AFL return when he said he would see how Salem trains tomorrow. Made a point of saying he's had a mini preseason training fully for the past month.

Would prefer to see him play VFL (even 70-80% game) but wouldn't be surprised if he ends up the sub.


17 minutes ago, Young Blood said:

Probably making assumptions going by Goodwin's presser.

I did find it strange that he didn't rule it out when asked. I thought the answer would simply be that he will come through the VFL but made it sound possible of AFL return when he said he would see how Salem trains tomorrow. Made a point of saying he's had a mini preseason training fully for the past month.

Would prefer to see him play VFL (even 70-80% game) but wouldn't be surprised if he ends up the sub.

Won't happen.

Interesting Goody didn’t mention Schache when talking about forwards coming in for Petty. Looks like being either TMac or BBB.

 
1 hour ago, JJR said:

I couldn't agree more, I keep reading our forward line isn't working properly yet when you're the highest scoring team in the comp you'd think we're doing something better than all other teams. 

Its pretty strange isn't it. Although I think the media's questions have more been around whether Goodwin is starting to feel settled with what his best forward set up looks like, I still get a feeling around the AFL that people believe our forward line isn't fully functioning yet, maybe they are just looking at it more in a traditional sense where our talls are leading our scoring (ala Geelong) which is silly obviously. But I also don't know why Collingwood whose forwards have scored 10-20 less goals then our forward aren't getting similar queries.

The below showing the inside 50 differentials between the top teams isn't overly significant. But the amount of goals we're scoring is. Our accuracy is outstanding (especially if you take out the Hawthorn game where I thought we were just a bit casual with our shot attempts).

 

image.png.3c0b32b1919e1e668795177fb6d26de3.png

Edited by Young Blood

2 hours ago, binman said:

And with the ridiculously sky high rents acrross Australia, no chance of living rent free in opponents' heads.

Hinkley appeared to try this out last night on 360 Bin and was forcefully ejected from the premises quick smart by our learned Premiership coach


I thought they might give Smith a go this week after Goody pumped him up a fortnight ago.

Going by today's presser, it sounds like Petty's repalcement will come from BB, TMac or Melksham.

I reckon it'll be the latter to play a defensive role on Aliir and will hopefully ensure we don't get exposed at ground level.

Let's hope whoever comes in is clean at ground level and lay some tackles.

Edited by A F

6 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

he's the master of saying nothing

There's no question about that. 

Port unavailable players 

Charlie Dixon Quad Test 

Xavier Duursma Knee 6-8 weeks 

Orazio Fantasia Quad 2 weeks 

Mitch Georgiades Knee Season 

Todd Marshall Concussion 1-2 weeks 

Junior Rioli Suspension Round 11

 

Narrm players unavailable

Luke Dunstan Knee 2-4 weeks

 Harrison Petty Foot 4-6 weeks

 Tom Sparrow Suspension 1 week

 Kye Turner Groin 4-5 weeks

 Will Verrall Pelvis 4-5 weeks

 

9 hours ago, Dannyz said:

I think Salem will play AFL

Serious? he's had no game time.


3 hours ago, A F said:

I thought they might give Smith a go this week after Goody pumped him up a fortnight ago.

Going by today's presser, it sounds like Petty's repalcement will come from BB, TMac or Melksham.

I reckon it'll be the latter to play a defensive role on Aliir and will hopefully ensure we don't get exposed at ground level.

Let's hope whoever comes in is clean at ground level and lay some tackles.

If its wet can 100 percent guarantee it will be Melk.

12 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

There is predicted rain on Friday night.

Makes me now wonder whether they'll bring in Joel Smith instead for the extra speed and ground ball ability. 

I'd like to see Joel come in, has some good form and if BBB/TMac aren't 100% (I don't think they are) they aren't going to be useful if there is anything other than good conditions.

33 minutes ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

If its wet can 100 percent guarantee it will be Melk.

He has also proven that he can play a defensive role on Alir even though he is playing less of that intercepting defender and has started to play 1 on 1 better.

3 hours ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

There's no question about that. 

Maybe someone should ask it then

9 hours ago, picket fence said:

Quad strains are nefarious injuries and unless 100 % he would not be risked

Especially older players like a Dixon.


9 hours ago, Demon_spurs said:

I think they had to rebuild a few after they all got Trained down in the pre-season

They can't, all the house builders keep going under!

4 hours ago, A F said:

I thought they might give Smith a go this week after Goody pumped him up a fortnight ago.

Going by today's presser, it sounds like Petty's repalcement will come from BB, TMac or Melksham.

I reckon it'll be the latter to play a defensive role on Aliir and will hopefully ensure we don't get exposed at ground level.

Let's hope whoever comes in is clean at ground level and lay some tackles.

I think Jake the snake is the best one for this task.

Edited by AzzKikA

13 hours ago, picket fence said:

You would have a yet unproven Petty as forward over a proven premiership forward who kicked 3 goals in Ben Brown?

Yeah right. We need BB firing if we are to win another flag period!

Ben Brown will be in this week but no doubt Petty was ahead of him. Time to step up Big Ben.

 
6 hours ago, Young Blood said:

Its pretty strange isn't it. Although I think the media's questions have more been around whether Goodwin is starting to feel settled with what his best forward set up looks like, I still get a feeling around the AFL that people believe our forward line isn't fully functioning yet, maybe they are just looking at it more in a traditional sense where our talls are leading our scoring (ala Geelong) which is silly obviously. But I also don't know why Collingwood whose forwards have scored 10-20 less goals then our forward aren't getting similar queries.

The below showing the inside 50 differentials between the top teams isn't overly significant. But the amount of goals we're scoring is. Our accuracy is outstanding (especially if you take out the Hawthorn game where I thought we were just a bit casual with our shot attempts).

 

image.png.3c0b32b1919e1e668795177fb6d26de3.png

146 goals, 86 behinds, to me that's a very well oiled forward line. Maybe a few little things need tweaking cause no team is perfect. 

22 hours ago, Fat Tony said:

The decision on who comes in for Petty will have a lot to do with how we plan for Aliir.

I think I would go for Brown to stretch their defence and play Van Rooyen on Aliir. 

Sorry FT, where do they each play?

Is Bbb or whoever comes in,  at Ff and Jvr at Chf?

I see Jvr as someone with a lot of pace and stamina and see him playing at Chf better. 

 


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Vomit
      • Like
    • 123 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 381 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
    • 47 replies