Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, rpfc said:

He’s serviceable. It’s still the glaring gap on our list moving into next year.

My point was at this stage he's serviceable as a forward and if it clicks, he'll be more. As Goodwin intimated in the presser, they want to give it a further try. Let's see if it works.

 

I expect JVR will be out so bring in the Shack (even though he's a lightweight), send Petty back and May forward.

 

Hawks fancy their chances 

Forwards Mitch Lewis Moore Breust 

Contested footy Newcomb Worpel

pace and run Jiath Day Amon

Dees need to dominate in the ruck and get first use of the footy


I agree with (some) others that the Petty forward experiment should continue a little longer.

If that fails, I think Schache should get another chance or chances.

 

1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Hawks fancy their chances 

Forwards Mitch Lewis Moore Breust 

Contested footy Newcomb Worpel

pace and run Jiath Day Amon

Dees need to dominate in the ruck and get first use of the footy

You know they're on the bottom of the ladder with one win (vs North) and a percentage of 61.6%?

They are below West Coast who have about 25 fit players, half of whom should be nowhere near AFL selection.

 

Really interested to hear that it seems Smith is now in front of Brown in the selection order.

Brown went from two of his better games for us, ever, to an innocuous back injury, to completely out of form and now apparently not really that close to selection. A really disappointing two months for him.

I've never been a Smith fan. I'm still not. We can't trust his body and I'm not sure he's smart enough to play forward. But I'm happy to be proven wrong - he was starting to prove me wrong in the first month last year as a defender before he got injured.

6 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

Fitness isn’t the problem, if anything he might be too fit and we might’ve trained the speed out of him. 

This comment is almost as good as my "Salem's body type is that of an ectomorph" circa 2015.

 


12 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

Fitness isn’t the problem, if anything he might be too fit and we might’ve trained the speed out of him. 

A week off or cutting his game time down towards 70% could help. But we might have to wait until the bye to see if there’s much change with a freshen up.

From a fitness or sports science point of view are you able to elaborate further on what exact this even means??

8 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Hawks fancy their chances 

Forwards Mitch Lewis Moore Breust 

Contested footy Newcomb Worpel

pace and run Jiath Day Amon

Dees need to dominate in the ruck and get first use of the footy

They're tanking SONS. I expect them to be decent early before falling away in the second half. It's been the pattern of their season so far.

14 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

Fitness isn’t the problem, if anything he might be too fit and we might’ve trained the speed out of him. 

A week off or cutting his game time down towards 70% could help. But we might have to wait until the bye to see if there’s much change with a freshen up.

How so DS?

Could it be too much time in the weight room or maybe too much focus on the aerobic endurance fitness and not enough high intensity anaerobic stuff like sprints? Keen to hear your thoughts. 

I wonder what they are saying over at Linda Crescent, Glenferrie....


11 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Hawks fancy their chances 

Forwards Mitch Lewis Moore Breust 

Contested footy Newcomb Worpel

pace and run Jiath Day Amon

Dees need to dominate in the ruck and get first use of the footy

not in the same league as Clarrie, Trac et al

16 hours ago, The heart beats true said:

I’m one of those whose firmly of the belief that Petty is currently a better option forward.

Petty serves two roles. He takes the opposition key defender and playmaker like Collins from GC or McCartin/McDonald from Sydney, Weitering from Carlton, McGovern from WCE etc and tries to stop their intercept marks. Against Geelong he would probably play Stewart and against the Pies probably Mihocek.

The other is clearly to mark and kick goals himself.

He isn't being recognised on here for the first paragraph.

 

25 minutes ago, Salems Lot said:

I wonder what they are saying over at Linda Crescent, Glenferrie....

From the coles car park? Or the council leisure centre? There’s not much else happening around there these days 😊

Edited by Glorious Day

8 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

Petty serves two roles. He takes the opposition key defender and playmaker like Collins from GC or McCartin/McDonald from Sydney, Weitering from Carlton, McGovern from WCE etc and tries to stop their intercept marks. Against Geelong he would probably play Stewart and against the Pies probably Mihocek.

The other is clearly to mark and kick goals himself.

He isn't being recognised on here for the first paragraph.

 

Maybe but he's sure not performing the second. I do think he's a great defender.

It's not to say he can't play forward.  It may take him some time to learn the craft but I'm not sure we can risk it. Certainly not with a 6 gamer playing alongside him. I hope I'm wrong. 

Edited by leave it to deever

17 hours ago, Deemania since 56 said:

Yep, it will be good to see Frosty play - keeps us all full of smiles and tolerances - admire his speed, too.

The only ex player currently playing Afl that keeps giving back to the Mfc.


2 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

The only ex player currently playing Afl that keeps giving back to the Mfc.

Pretty sure Sauce Baker handballed it straight back to Tracc when we played the Dogs!

10 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

Really interested to hear that it seems Smith is now in front of Brown in the selection order.

Brown went from two of his better games for us, ever, to an innocuous back injury, to completely out of form and now apparently not really that close to selection. A really disappointing two months for him.

I've never been a Smith fan. I'm still not. We can't trust his body and I'm not sure he's smart enough to play forward. But I'm happy to be proven wrong - he was starting to prove me wrong in the first month last year as a defender before he got injured.

Hmmm and how exactly have you landed on that assessment?

IMHO

Retain Disco with Petty forward.

Hibberd in, Gus to the midfield rotation and JJ to the sub (nothing against James Harmes who I think has been a good sub the last two weeks)

J.Smith for JVR if he doesn't get off - may as well have a look at him forward at this stage.

But that means Harmes, Spargo, Laurie and Salem don't have match play this week ...

BBB and TMac too, but maybe they can both benefit from a(nother) week off

 
32 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

Pretty sure Sauce Baker handballed it straight back to Tracc when we played the Dogs!

Tracc must have called for it.

Lost in the JVR focus this week was Goodwin's comments during his presser yesterday about team selection.

He said, clearly, we're keeping Petty forward. The FD like what they see there. Similarly, they're not quite happy with Brown and have him working on things at VFL level. Goodwin didn't want to comment on who gets JVR's spot if the appeal fails but I suspect it won't be Brown; probably Smith, knowing how the FD think.

Regardless of Brown's form, I don't like Petty forward and IMO I think we're barking up the wrong tree there, but the FD have a view and it's going to be persisted with.

Hibberd sounds like he's coming straight back in, probably for Turner I'd imagine, and then it's hard to know if Spargo gets his spot back.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
    • 61 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 297 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 47 replies