Jump to content

Featured Replies

It's always great to have Spargo pop up up and kick a goal when we need one. Always on time and does it so often.

 

I think everything about our good performance has been said so I'll give a shout out to the commentary team on fox (I can't believe I'm typing this).

Just four people calling a game of footy without yelling and hyperbole. I actually left the volume up. Very relaxing game to watch.

We're starting to really click into gear now.

Go Dees

5 minutes ago, Brownie said:

I think everything about our good performance has been said so I'll give a shout out to the commentary team on fox (I can't believe I'm typing this).

Just four people calling a game of footy without yelling and hyperbole. I actually left the volume up. Very relaxing game to watch.

We're starting to really click into gear now.

Go Dees

Good point. 

Like this too.

 

There were a lot of posters arguing that Tmac was done.

I get it to some extent but it wasn't that long ago when he was a huge part of our last flag.

Yesterday he showed those skills and determination again. 

A fit Tmac playing at his best will see us go all the way again.

I know this isn't a punting forum but just wanted to share my pain with any punters in the group :)

image.thumb.jpeg.17b3648bb20eb552f5f002a62a90a9f3.jpeg


12 minutes ago, BigFez said:

I know this isn't a punting forum but just wanted to share my pain with any punters in the group :)

image.thumb.jpeg.17b3648bb20eb552f5f002a62a90a9f3.jpeg

Ouch Fez. I think as punishment Kozzy should sign a long term contract to stay at Melbourne 

43 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

From the 2023 Laws of the Game.

1.1 DEFINITIONS
...
Goal Line: the white line marked on the Playing Surface between each goal post, as illustrated in Diagram 1.

...

16.1 GOALS AND BEHINDS
16.1.1 Scoring a Goal
Subject to Law 16.2, a Goal is scored when the football is Kicked completely over the Goal Line by a Player of the  Attacking Team without being touched by any other Player, even if the football first touches the ground.
16.1.2 Scoring a Behind
Subject to Law 16.2, a Behind is scored when any of the following occurs:
...
(b) the football touches or passes over the goal post or touches the padding or any 
other attachment to the goal post;
(c) a Player of the Attacking Team Kicks the football over the Goal Line but before 
completely passing over the Goal Line, the football is touched by another Player;

Note: "Goal Line", not "back of the padding".

According to the rules, it's a goal. This "back of the padding" thing is a furphy.

This needs to be sent to the AFL, ch7 and fox footy to remind them all that the padding only applies if it is hit by the ball.

 
29 minutes ago, Brownie said:

I think everything about our good performance has been said so I'll give a shout out to the commentary team on fox (I can't believe I'm typing this).

Just four people calling a game of footy without yelling and hyperbole. I actually left the volume up. Very relaxing game to watch.

We're starting to really click into gear now.

Go Dees

Agree, browny & Gaz a breath of fresh air.

Solid performance, lifted off the pedal lightly in the last but still kept it down enough. All the players did their bit and aside from hibbos Achilles and levers "bit of an ankle" unscathed. Bring on the bombers next week.

30 minutes ago, BigFez said:

I know this isn't a punting forum but just wanted to share my pain with any punters in the group :)

image.thumb.jpeg.17b3648bb20eb552f5f002a62a90a9f3.jpeg

I've been trying to tell everyone that Pickett's no good, but will they listen?


25 minutes ago, AzzKikA said:

This needs to be sent to the AFL, ch7 and fox footy to remind them all that the padding only applies if it is hit by the ball.

The score reviewers have only one decision to make (unlike the umps for whom I feel pity despite my swearing at them). You'd think they'd know the rules that affect their one simple job. Apparently not. (I wouldn't expect the commentators to know much at all.)

 

Edited by sue

I finally made the move and got a Kayo subscription. Watched the game last night and 2 things were immediately apparent. One quality of the game commentators is a vast improvement on channel 7. And no ads while the game is underway. Oh the bliss of no Brian ! I have resisted for some time because I am firmly in the “ there is no substitute for going to the game “ however with an ever increase of games at night and those not on FTA I succumbed to Kayo. The upside is I can watch when and wherever I am ( last night on my IPad while away for Easter. ) the 21st century has caught up with me and not all of it is bad. P.S F1 is looking good from now.

Edited by old dee

22 minutes ago, AzzKikA said:

Agree, browny & Gaz a breath of fresh air.

Solid performance, lifted off the pedal lightly in the last but still kept it down enough. All the players did their bit and aside from hibbos Achilles and levers "bit of an ankle" unscathed. Bring on the bombers next week.

Compared to 7 commentators they are heaven. 

5 minutes ago, sue said:

The score reviewers have only one decision to make (unlike the umps for whom I feel pity despite my swearing at them). You'd think they'd know the rules that affect their one simple job. Apparently not. (I wouldn't expect the commentators to know much at all.)

 

Does anyone even know who the score reviewers are? They've never explained who it is making these decisions, are they actually umpires/officials? No one knows.

Having said that I think it was a point.

Edited by Dr. Gonzo

4 minutes ago, old dee said:

I finally made the move and got a Kayo subscription. Watched the game last night and 2 things were immediately apparent. One quality of the game commentators is a vast improvement on channel 7. And no ads while the game is underway. Oh the bliss of no Brian ! I have resisted for some time because I am firmly in the “ there is no substitute for going to the game “ however with an ever increase of games at night and those not on FTA I succumbed to Kayo. The upside is I can watch when and wherever I am ( last night on my IPad while away for Easter. ) the 21st century has caught up with me and not all of it is bad. 

Wait until the next tv rights deal (starting next year?) when Fox/Kayo are allowed to provide their own commentators for ALL games - we'll never have to listen to BT, Jobe, Lingy, McLachlan and the rest of those nuffies again (except for the GF and hopefully we'll all be at the G and can watch the replays with the radio commentary 🤣)

Edited by Dr. Gonzo


1 hour ago, Mazer Rackham said:

From the 2023 Laws of the Game.

1.1 DEFINITIONS
...
Goal Line: the white line marked on the Playing Surface between each goal post, as illustrated in Diagram 1.

...

16.1 GOALS AND BEHINDS
16.1.1 Scoring a Goal
Subject to Law 16.2, a Goal is scored when the football is Kicked completely over the Goal Line by a Player of the  Attacking Team without being touched by any other Player, even if the football first touches the ground.
16.1.2 Scoring a Behind
Subject to Law 16.2, a Behind is scored when any of the following occurs:
...
(b) the football touches or passes over the goal post or touches the padding or any 
other attachment to the goal post;
(c) a Player of the Attacking Team Kicks the football over the Goal Line but before 
completely passing over the Goal Line, the football is touched by another Player;

Note: "Goal Line", not "back of the padding".

According to the rules, it's a goal. This "back of the padding" thing is a furphy.

I agree 100%. The back of the padding is totally irrelevant. We, and Frittata, were robbed of a goal. 

54 minutes ago, Brownie said:

I think everything about our good performance has been said so I'll give a shout out to the commentary team on fox (I can't believe I'm typing this).

Just four people calling a game of footy without yelling and hyperbole. I actually left the volume up. Very relaxing game to watch.

We're starting to really click into gear now.

Go Dees

The most relaxed and enjoyable TV commentary that I can remember.   None of this blokey “wodya think BT,  Richo etc” nonsense.   

10 hours ago, Maldonboy38 said:

Our fumbling is becoming a concern and will hurt us against the better sides, especially when it is Petracca, Viney, Oliver, ANB, Spargo etc... who are usually so clean. We have to tidy this up. 

My man Brayshaw is possibly our sloppiest current player. Some of his un-pressured stuff ups today (and over the last 2 weeks as well) were mind boggling. It is only his 2-way running and defensive efforts keeping him in the 22. He is a gun, but clean hands and feet required.

 

I agree.. not sure why so many of the team have been fumbling and yesterday was particularly bad (obviously it was highly contested, but still, there were many dropped uncontested marks). and yes, my fave brayshaw has been one of the big culprits. not a great look. i also noticed chandler was a little guilt of it it in the first half too. it seems to catch on throughout the rest of the team, much like missed shots at goal.. 

a slightly better/healthier opposition yesterday would've made a more stressful watch. we were lucky we weren't punished.

2 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Does anyone even know who the score reviewers are? They've never explained who it is making these decisions, are they actually umpires/officials? No one knows.

Having said that I think it was a point.

No idea but I think we all need to chip in so they can have their glasses prescription updated.

53 minutes ago, BigFez said:

I know this isn't a punting forum but just wanted to share my pain with any punters in the group :)

image.thumb.jpeg.17b3648bb20eb552f5f002a62a90a9f3.jpeg

They never come off the multis 

Edited by BrisbaneDemon

2 minutes ago, monoccular said:

I agree 100%. The back of the padding is totally irrelevant. We, and Frittata, were robbed of a goal. 

The most relaxed and enjoyable TV commentary that I can remember.   None of this blokey “wodya think BT,  Richo etc” nonsense.   

"Whadda you think, Lingy?"

"Who's Lingy?"

"You mate. You're Lingy."

"Oh right. I wondered why people always always call me Lingy. I think ... what was the question again?"


10 minutes ago, old dee said:

Compared to 7 commentators they are heaven. 

Commentary on Richmond Dogs was excellent too. Hudson, Dunstall and Buckley. Too rare a thing though.

5 minutes ago, BrisbaneDemon said:

1F93D56B-F0C0-414A-8480-972B94C73ACA.jpeg

Well played!  Think I was too greedy with 3+.

5 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

"Whadda you think, Lingy?"

"Who's Lingy?"

"You mate. You're Lingy."

"Oh right. I wondered why people always always call me Lingy. I think ... what was the question again?"

 

5 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

"Whadda you think, Lingy?"

"Who's Lingy?"

"You mate. You're Lingy."

"Oh right. I wondered why people always always call me Lingy. I think ... what was the question again?"

Why do channel 7 think this the way to go? I don’t know of one person who enjoys it. Pure [censored].

 
1 hour ago, Mazer Rackham said:

From the 2023 Laws of the Game.

1.1 DEFINITIONS
...
Goal Line: the white line marked on the Playing Surface between each goal post, as illustrated in Diagram 1.

...

16.1 GOALS AND BEHINDS
16.1.1 Scoring a Goal
Subject to Law 16.2, a Goal is scored when the football is Kicked completely over the Goal Line by a Player of the  Attacking Team without being touched by any other Player, even if the football first touches the ground.
16.1.2 Scoring a Behind
Subject to Law 16.2, a Behind is scored when any of the following occurs:
...
(b) the football touches or passes over the goal post or touches the padding or any 
other attachment to the goal post;
(c) a Player of the Attacking Team Kicks the football over the Goal Line but before 
completely passing over the Goal Line, the football is touched by another Player;

Note: "Goal Line", not "back of the padding".

According to the rules, it's a goal. This "back of the padding" thing is a furphy.

Very clear rule The umpires should know that

 

Just read a match review that deadset described Lever as a “high profile recruit”. He’s in his sixth season at the club ffs. Twice as long as he was at the fruit tingles.

its akin to referring to “ex-Bomber” Michael Hibberd or “Number 2 draft pick” Christian Petracca.

Edited by P-man


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 47 replies