Jump to content

Featured Replies

Unlikely though it seems I think TMac's performance in the VFL tomorrow will strongly influence Grundy's future for this season at least

 
59 minutes ago, Redleg said:

What, one wet evening game will decide whether he stays or goes? 

I think whether he goes or stays is really up to him and it will be based on more than just tonight.

I think given the current situation, we are happy to keep him and honour his contract. 

How is it up to him? There is a contract in place. If we want him, we keep him. We need him.

If Gawn was to go down (again) who have we got? JvR no. TMac useless as a ruckman. No one at Casey.

7 minutes ago, M_9 said:

How is it up to him? There is a contract in place. If we want him, we keep him. We need him.

If Gawn was to go down (again) who have we got? JvR no. TMac useless as a ruckman. No one at Casey.

If Grundy asks to leave and we can do a good deal, we will accomodate him. 

That’s how we operate.

 
1 hour ago, Redleg said:

What, one wet evening game will decide whether he stays or goes? 

I think whether he goes or stays is really up to him and it will be based on more than just tonight.

I think given the current situation, we are happy to keep him and honour his contract. 

But is he Mr Leg?


1 hour ago, Redleg said:

If Grundy asks to leave and we can do a good deal, we will accomodate him. 

That’s how we operate.

Agree if Grundy was anything but a ruckman. We can cover every other position on the ground. For the games that Max missed who would have rucked?

50 minutes ago, M_9 said:

Agree if Grundy was anything but a ruckman. We can cover every other position on the ground. For the games that Max missed who would have rucked?

I am not arguing, I am just saying if he wants to leave we won’t force him to stay.

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

I am not arguing, I am just saying if he wants to leave we won’t force him to stay.

If he plays a poor game tonight will he get dropped? I think he is  like Max he plays best when he is number 0ne and rucks most of the game. 

 

 
19 minutes ago, old dee said:

If he plays a poor game tonight will he get dropped? I think he is  like Max he plays best when he is number 0ne and rucks most of the game. 

 

I don’t know.

We have problems with our key forwards now and I am unsure of what the makeup will be for the remaining games.


40 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

it's not working

it is a real shame

it should've been a point of difference for us

instead it's become a hindrance to our style of play

Agree and Max was bog ordinary tonight!

15 hours ago, Redleg said:

I don’t know.

We have problems with our key forwards now and I am unsure of what the makeup will be for the remaining games.

We don't have any key fwds Rl.

Well we have one. A young first year kid who tries his guts out every week and does well considering he's still developing.

All our four key fwds out injured.

Every club would struggle under this. 

And as for Melksham he's either on or off and explains why he's been in the Magoo's for two years.

Schache isn't up to it either.

That's five of them not in the picture. It's a pretty tough situation for any club.

Unless Fritta comes back and fires I can't see us winning a flag. And even if he does it Will still be tough without another key tall.

We have a great backline but they can't do it all.

Maybe the club should have done more when Bbb and Tmac showed signs of injury and form drop but it's hard to fight dumb luck sometimes.

 

I am over the Grundy experiment.

We just can't afford to have  a ruckman or forward who struggles to mark.

It's fundamental skill of the game.

He's good at tap work and below his knees but marking always takes precedence.

And you can't train it into someone.

20 hours ago, M_9 said:

Agree if Grundy was anything but a ruckman. We can cover every other position on the ground. For the games that Max missed who would have rucked?

Schache with JVR as the chop out.

That combo would be no better or worse than Grundy at this point in a ruck sense.

Probably better as we would have ourselves a capable forward who can kick a goal or two most games.

Grundy lucky to score one goal every other game.  He isn't a part-time forward and not sure why the FD keep talking about trying to  improve his game here.

Very average player all round now post injury.  Has minor moments where he looks reasonable but that's it.

Ppl need to get over the fact that he's some sort of 'impact' player or will turn into one.

His AA days are well behind him unfortunately.  Didn't impress in his two matches at VFL level yet still got a call up.

Very costly recall last night and poor selection given the conditions.  Probably cost us the game imo.

Edited by Demon Dynasty


At this point last season, Goodwin locked in Jackson and Gawn alternating forward at the expense of a 2nd permanent key forward. It really never looked potent enough but Goodwin persisted with it until 5 minutes were left against Brisbane when he swung Petty forward.

It was much the same last night with Grundy and Gawn. I don’t know where that leaves Grundy - whether Goodwin is bold enough to leave him out next week and whether we can afford to keep him in the same side with one of TMac or Brown.

It’s a tough situation. Really, the only clear positive is that if Gawn goes down, we know we have top tier insurance.

Edited by wisedog

Four tall forwards injured and one ineffectual in any form of crowd.

Not our year guys

bbb being injured today after a bye doesn't auger well even for those of us who are desperate.

TMac might provide some definition to the forward structure but I doubt that we can expect the TMac of old

 

Um, I think my views are quite known when it comes to the Grundy Experiment but we are going to play a QF for a chance to have a home PF…

So things are not as bleak as some seem to think…

41 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Four tall forwards injured and one ineffectual in any form of crowd.

Not our year guys

bbb being injured today after a bye doesn't auger well even for those of us who are desperate.

TMac might provide some definition to the forward structure but I doubt that we can expect the TMac of old

 

How many effective tall forwards do the Pies have? Plenty of ways to skin a cat. Get on board ffs. Its not our year... until we win the QF and suddenly it might just be again?

Edited by John Demonic

11 minutes ago, John Demonic said:

How many effective tall forwards do the Pies have? Plenty of ways to skin a cat. Get on board ffs. Its not our year... until we win the QF and suddenly it might just be again?

Pies play a different style. Run and skilled delivery at chest level to a leading small forward with Mihochek providing the taller marking option on the lead

We can dream but it's never been in our gameplan


Despite all his attributes he brings to the game.  He doesn’t fit into our current structure when you compare to the alternate forwards, we really missed petty last night and Grundy is not even close as a forward. 

It's just a bit of a suspicion but I think Grundy's been a tad 'Melburnised' 

He doesn't seem to play with the same dash and dare he did at the Filth. Its as though he's trying to do too much that's not quite him. 

E.g.  coming through the guts he hand passes ( hospital varietal)  when he should have eyed up an entry kick into the fifty..noy necessarily at someone but where they could run onto.

Just one instance...but there were others.

Always doing the seeming 'team' thing..  I want players to do the "best" thing...according to the moment.

Am not slighting him as i feel he's constrained... jmo.

3 hours ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Schache with JVR as the chop out.

…

Currently watching Casey. Nearly half time. Have yet to see either Schache or TMac touch the ball.

Trade Grundy by all means but pray Max doesn’t get injured. There is no back up.

 
4 minutes ago, M_9 said:

Currently watching Casey. Nearly half time. Have yet to see either Schache or TMac touch the ball.

Trade Grundy by all means but pray Max doesn’t get injured. There is no back up.

Jason Taylor said at Trade time that's why he selected Schache.  He was the break-glass option if Max went down as makeshift ruck

5 minutes ago, Demon17 said:

Jason Taylor said at Trade time that's why he selected Schache.  He was the break-glass option if Max went down as makeshift ruck

That wont be the best of outcomes should that have transpired.

Disappointed in the Shack..  another of those ..nqr for AFL ...  

He's not the answer  ( i now realise and concede )


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie? 
    Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG. Unfortunately, performances like these went against the grain of what Melbourne has been producing from virtually midway through 2024 and extending right through to the present day. This is a game between two clubs who have faltered over the past couple of years because their disposal efficiency is appalling. Neither of them can hit the side of a barn door but history tells us that every once in a while such teams have their lucky days or come up against an opponent in even worse shape and hence, one of them will come up trumps in this match.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 258 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sunday’s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Thanks
    • 17 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullarton’s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Casey’s three matches and, with Melbourne’s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next week’s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forward’s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasn’t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the team’s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourne’s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season. There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight. Since that game, the Demons’ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 04

    Round 4 kicks off with a blockbuster on Thursday night as traditional rivals Collingwood and Carlton clash at the MCG, with the Magpies looking to assert themselves as early-season contenders and the Blues seeking their first win of the season. Saturday opens with Gold Coast hosting Adelaide, a key test for the Suns as they aim to back up their big win last week, while the Crows will be looking to keep their perfect record intact. Reigning wooden spooners Richmond have the daunting task of facing reigning premiers Brisbane at the ‘G and the Lions will be eager to reaffirm their premiership credentials after a patchy start. Saturday night sees North Melbourne take on Sydney at Marvel Stadium, with the Swans looking to build on their first win of the season last week against a rebuilding Roos outfit. Sunday’s action begins with GWS hosting West Coast at ENGIE Stadium, a game that could get ugly very early for the visitors. Port Adelaide vs St Kilda at Adelaide Oval looms as a interesting clash, with both clubs form being very hard to read. The round wraps up with Fremantle taking on the Western Bulldogs at Optus Stadium in what could be a fierce contest between two sides with top-eight ambitions. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

      • Thanks
    • 273 replies
    Demonland