Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 9/16/2023 at 5:24 PM, BW511 said:

This is my pet peeve with our side. Half of our forwards are defenders first and itโ€™s left to too few generating scores.

The balance is not quite right

Its our game plan - Forward half territory.ย 

Its why a forward line like Collingwood, which on paper is "No Frills", can prosper.

When you play with 3/4 of oppositions defense in the forward 50, what is the expectation? We take a contested mark? We have one of the shortest lists going around.ย 

ย 
4 minutes ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Its our game plan - Forward half territory.ย 

Its why a forward line like Collingwood, which on paper is "No Frills", can prosper.

When you play with 3/4 of oppositions defense in the forward 50, what is the expectation? We take a contested mark? We have one of the shortest lists going around.ย 

It's all about ball movement, opposition teams know our kick inside 50m is terrible so they sit back wait for the turnover kick and attack from there.

Until we address the teams kicking we have to play this way.ย  Kick the ball better you can hit that dangerous through the corridor kick and open up your forward line, whilst we kick poorly we are stuck with the predictable kick.

42 minutes ago, drdrake said:

It's all about ball movement, opposition teams know our kick inside 50m is terrible so they sit back wait for the turnover kick and attack from there.

Until we address the teams kicking we have to play this way.ย  Kick the ball better you can hit that dangerous through the corridor kick and open up your forward line, whilst we kick poorly we are stuck with the predictable kick.

100%. Said it last year that we have to evolve. Frankly didn't see any improvement in a ball use.

I also notice that our inside-to-outside chains are non-existent. We never try to clear the contest to the outside, just win-it and hack it forward.ย 

 
1 hour ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Its our game plan - Forward half territory.ย 

Its why a forward line like Collingwood, which on paper is "No Frills", can prosper.

When you play with 3/4 of oppositions defense in the forward 50, what is the expectation? We take a contested mark? We have one of the shortest lists going around.ย 

Understand completely, I just donโ€™t agree with it and think our balance and game style is not quite evolved enough yet.

4 hours ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Its our game plan - Forward half territory.ย 

Its why a forward line like Collingwood, which on paper is "No Frills", can prosper.

When you play with 3/4 of oppositions defense in the forward 50, what is the expectation? We take a contested mark? We have one of the shortest lists going around.ย 

That is why Goody is happy if our talls in a pack situation can get the ball to ground in a good spot for our smalls to work from. Its get the ball in and keep it in.

Petty is smart on the lead and good in a one on one up forward.

Petty, Melksham injuries JVR suspension and Brayshaw concussion stuffed our chances - luck does play a part. You need a pretty healthy list going into and during finals.

ย 

ย 


23 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

His kicking action is eerily similar to Steven May.

mckercher, regarded as the best kick in the draft has said that he thinks schoenmakers is top tier, would be a real weapon from deep defence to release pressure if he can spot up targets outside d50

On 9/14/2023 at 8:24 PM, spirit of norm smith said:

Interested to see Charlie Edwards rise up into Calโ€™s listing. Heโ€™s at Melbourne Grammar and got better and better as the year progressed. ย His last few games at Sandy Dragons were hugely impressive. ย The dragons are a breeding ground for quality Mids.

If the Dees have a second round pick around the 22-25 range, he would be hopefully on JTs list.

190cms. Strong. Good pace. Inside or outside. Skills. Can kick 45+ metres.

Iโ€™m putting him into JTs list.ย 

@DeeSpencer@ChaserJ

Charlie Edwards had another good game in preliminary final. ย Looks like heโ€™d fit into the Dees midfield like a glove. ย He might be the Demonlanders one to watch in this years draft.ย 
ย 

18 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

@DeeSpencer@ChaserJ

Charlie Edwards had another good game in preliminary final. ย Looks like heโ€™d fit into the Dees midfield like a glove. ย He might be the Demonlanders one to watch in this years draft.ย 
ย 

Yep, looking forward to watching Edwards on Sunday!

ย 

I missed this, in an article by Cal Twomey, 4 days ago:

" Sanders, who has an Indigenous background, is yet to be added to the AFL's Next Generation Academy list. Under NGA rules, clubs can't match bids on prospects inside the first 40 picks of the draft, but there has been a view that the Roos could be given access to match a bid at any point for Sanders as part of their assistance package.

However, with just over a week to go before the AFL Commission meets, there is a growing feel among rivals that Sanders, a certain top-10 pick, will more likely be in the open pool. "

Hopefully this happens, as it would be good news for us, as he may end up being the one we draft with our first pick.

On 9/19/2023 at 10:29 PM, 2021 said:

I missed this, in an article by Cal Twomey, 4 days ago:

" Sanders, who has an Indigenous background, is yet to be added to the AFL's Next Generation Academy list. Under NGA rules, clubs can't match bids on prospects inside the first 40 picks of the draft, but there has been a view that the Roos could be given access to match a bid at any point for Sanders as part of their assistance package.

However, with just over a week to go before the AFL Commission meets, there is a growing feel among rivals that Sanders, a certain top-10 pick, will more likely be in the open pool. "

Hopefully this happens, as it would be good news for us, as he may end up being the one we draft with our first pick.

That would be good. Ridiculous if the supposed NGA process is manipulated to gift Sanders to the Roos. ย 

Sanders reminds me of Sam Walsh in his draft year. ย 

Whilst Sanders and Mckercher are a long term risk due to being from Tassie, they are both high quality Mids that have class and are the elite type Mids we desperately need. ย Both would be ready to debut within the 1st half of 2024 imv. Either would be great with pick 5/6. ย 


On 9/19/2023 at 10:29 PM, 2021 said:

I missed this, in an article by Cal Twomey, 4 days ago:

" Sanders, who has an Indigenous background, is yet to be added to the AFL's Next Generation Academy list. Under NGA rules, clubs can't match bids on prospects inside the first 40 picks of the draft, but there has been a view that the Roos could be given access to match a bid at any point for Sanders as part of their assistance package.

However, with just over a week to go before the AFL Commission meets, there is a growing feel among rivals that Sanders, a certain top-10 pick, will more likely be in the open pool. "Hopefully this happens, as it would be good news for us, as he may end up being the one we draft with our first pick.

North are really going to shape this draft eh. If the above does happen they would be in the box seat for the Suns pick 4. Package up 10&14. Giving them 2,3&4

Alternatively they could split 3 with us and still get Sanders. You would think they would be keen to bring in some established player rather than 3/4 first round picks.ย 

This draft is compromised to the ridiculous. North should not get a 1st round in this draft. How are middle of the range clubs supposed to improve if they are pushed back to far in the draft.

Crikey, if Northern clubs get a free hit at Academy picks below 40 they should be paying a 20% points premium for getting the player they want (at least for the top 10). 20% discount on top of getting a potential gun player. - stupid.

We will need to go 'hell for leather' to get GCs pick 4. If not at least a good move up the order. It will cost a mint in points though!!!

With our game plan we need forward players who can find space in a crowded phone box. Petty and Fritter can do this but another would be handy. If we can get 2 or 3 of this type on the field at once it makes them hard to cover.

Petty was a bigger loss than it was given credit for.

Watson or Caddy?

Better delivery to inside 50 would be handy as well. We need another player who is a ball collector as well as a good distributor?ย  Hard to find these types.ย 

Potential (available) A graders - excludes the father-son and Academy gift boxed players

Mids. ย  Reid, Mckercher, Sanders, Curtin

Mid runners. Wilson (Darcy), Windsor, Edwards (Charlie), Freijah

Med-small forward. Caddy, Watson, Duursmaย 

Key forwards ย Reid, Morris,ย 

Running defenders. Hardeman, Roberts , Philactidesย 

Key defenders. Oโ€™Sullivan , Murphy , Schoenmakers, Dawson

Rucks. Green (Will)ย 

Wildcard. ย  Ashton Moir.ย 

Edited by spirit of norm smith
O


Agree @BaliDemon

Mckercher is exactly the type of player that the Dees need.ย 


Skills. Pace. Excellent Decision maker. ย Goalkicker. ย Heโ€™s a gun. ย 

Doubt he gets to pick 6 because Kangas, Hawks and Suns pick (whoever gets it) will be seeing Mckercher as a key target to pick. ย We need to somehow get that GC pick. ย 


On 9/19/2023 at 9:11 PM, spirit of norm smith said:

@DeeSpencer@ChaserJ

Charlie Edwards had another good game in preliminary final. ย Looks like heโ€™d fit into the Dees midfield like a glove. ย He might be the Demonlanders one to watch in this years draft.ย 

Cal Twomeyโ€™s reckons Edwards is jumping into first round contention with performances like this:

ย 

9 minutes ago, ChaserJ said:

Cal Twomeyโ€™s reckons Edwards is jumping into first round contention with performances like this:

ย 

Skills seem meh

2 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:


Agree @BaliDemon

Mckercher is exactly the type of player that the Dees need.ย 


Skills. Pace. Excellent Decision maker. ย Goalkicker. ย Heโ€™s a gun. ย 

This is the guy๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ

15 minutes ago, RedLegs23 said:

This is the guy๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ

McKercherโ€™s terrific, think heโ€™ll have a similar impact to Gulden and Butters at AFL level. Donโ€™t see him getting to our pick unless Roos reach for Sanders. Even then it seems unlikely.

On 9/20/2023 at 10:15 AM, manny100 said:

This draft is compromised to the ridiculous. North should not get a 1st round in this draft. How are middle of the range clubs supposed to improve if they are pushed back to far in the draft.

Crikey, if Northern clubs get a free hit at Academy picks below 40 they should be paying a 20% points premium for getting the player they want (at least for the top 10). 20% discount on top of getting a potential gun player. - stupid.

We will need to go 'hell for leather' to get GCs pick 4. If not at least a good move up the order. It will cost a mint in points though!!!

If it wasnโ€™t for the AFL handing GC Anderson on a platter, weโ€™d be in a far better position. Now they hand GC Walters, and North appear to be getting more than they deserve. The player we shouldโ€™ve landed we probably wonโ€™t. I hope one of these players comes out and says Iโ€™ll only play for the Dees.


39 minutes ago, ChaserJ said:

McKercherโ€™s terrific, think heโ€™ll have a similar impact to Gulden and Butters at AFL level. Donโ€™t see him getting to our pick unless Roos reach for Sanders. Even then it seems unlikely.

Yeah no doubt. Pick 4 looks to be the key

From media reports, looks likeย 

1-Eagles ย Harley Reid

2- Suns (Academy match) ย Jed Walter

3-Kangas ย Coby Mckercherย 

4- Kangas (Mckay gift compensation ๐Ÿคฌ) Daniel Curtin

5- Hawks ย Zane Duursmaย 

6- Bulldogs (trade from Suns) Ryley Sandersย 

7- Dees โ€ฆ options left would be โ€ฆ bid on Ethan Read (Suns to match) โ€ฆ then choice of Caddy, Watson, Wilson or Oโ€™Sullivan. ย Right now Iโ€™d be picking Darcy Wilson as a running creative goalkicking mid. ย 
ย 

Love to see how we can grab that Suns pick.ย 

34 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

From media reports, looks likeย 

1-Eagles ย Harley Reid

2- Suns (Academy match) ย Jed Walter

3-Kangas ย Coby Mckercherย 

4- Kangas (Mckay gift compensation ๐Ÿคฌ) Daniel Curtin

5- Hawks ย Zane Duursmaย 

6- Bulldogs (trade from Suns) Ryley Sandersย 

7- Dees โ€ฆ options left would be โ€ฆ bid on Ethan Read (Suns to match) โ€ฆ then choice of Caddy, Watson, Wilson or Oโ€™Sullivan. ย Right now Iโ€™d be picking Darcy Wilson as a running creative goalkicking mid. ย 
ย 

Love to see how we can grab that Suns pick.ย 

Bulldogs will grab Watsonย 

ย 
On 9/20/2023 at 11:13 AM, spirit of norm smith said:

Potential (available) A graders - excludes the father-son and Academy gift boxed players

Mids. ย  Reid, Mckercher, Sanders, Curtin

Mid runners. Wilson (Darcy), Windsor, Edwards (Charlie), Freijah

Med-small forward. Caddy, Watson, Duursmaย 

Key forwards ย Reid, Morris,ย 

Running defenders. Hardeman, Roberts , Philactidesย 

Key defenders. Oโ€™Sullivan , Murphy , Schoenmakers, Dawson

Rucks. Green (Will)ย 

Wildcard. ย  Ashton Moir.ย 

A grade is a bit of a reach for 22 players

itโ€™s a term thrown around too often to describe players. Thereโ€™s no harm building a list with hard working competitive B graders who play 200+ games and having four to half a dozen A graders to ice the cake.

Hardeman is a great worker, runner and foot skills are pretty good but canโ€™t ever see him being A grade

16 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:


Agree @BaliDemon

Mckercher is exactly the type of player that the Dees need.ย 


Skills. Pace. Excellent Decision maker. ย Goalkicker. ย Heโ€™s a gun. ย 

Doubt he gets to pick 6 because Kangas, Hawks and Suns pick (whoever gets it) will be seeing Mckercher as a key target to pick. ย We need to somehow get that GC pick. ย 

Heโ€™s definitely what we need as a quick skilled midfielder, but will be gone before our picks it seems.ย 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demonsโ€™ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 91 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last yearโ€™s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Clubโ€™s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.ย Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Letโ€™s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the teamโ€™s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and โ€ฆ it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterdayโ€™s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourneโ€™s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldnโ€™t get any worse. Well, it did. And whatโ€™s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasnโ€™t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyonโ€™s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourneโ€™s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourneโ€™s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterdayโ€™s 7 goals 21 behinds.ย 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. Iโ€™ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?ย Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?ย 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 338 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies