Rarely would one witness a game where one ruckman is so absolutely dominant but at the same time ineffectual

Off the back of what happened at the Oscars I don’t want to condone violence. But Good Crivens there are some real slappable heads at the Western Bulldogs. 

Must have been a message from HQ for the commentators to talk up Ugle-Hagan tonight...

12 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

It's a deliberate tactic.  By moving that far away, they are not subject to the "Stand" rule.

Of course, it allows their opponent a clear 5 -  10 metre run forward.

The Dogs coaching team must think it is worth it.  I'm not so convinced.

I don’t see much difference between ceding 5-10 meters or having to stand on the mark.

Seems like a neutral trade off. 

My big fear last year was that the dogs would get this free kick treatment in the gf. So glad we smoked them and umps weren't as one sided as tonight. 

4 minutes ago, picket fence said:

So if you move back a meter or two then it Must be worth it

I'm not sure what the cut-off point is where you are deemed to be no longer standing the mark.

 

10 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Umgle Bungle or whatever his name is as No 1 draft pick looks a BUST

Also Bont 3 ordinary games in  row, hype must be too hard

Has to be injured.

Credit to the Dogs for their defensive work, Swans’ forward structure is a hot mess at the moment. 

5 minutes ago, rjay said:

Must have been a message from HQ for the commentators to talk up Ugle-Hagan tonight...

I think these are standing orders for all commentators.

What a dreadful game of footy. The swans kicking id deplorable and dogs not much better. No real pressure as well. 

Just now, Dee Zephyr said:

Credit to the Dogs for their defensive work, Swans’ forward structure is a hot mess at the moment. 

….. but they have Buddy 😮😱🤔

Live Ladder has us moved up to 3rd. Silver linings and all ...

Don't understand all the Tim English hate. He has been good tonight in both attack and defence. 

Swans the best ball movement team??

yeah nah

1 minute ago, Maldonboy38 said:

Don't understand all the Tim English hate. He has been good tonight in both attack and defence. 

No hate from me. He’s a good ordinary ruckman. WA is welcome to him so long as they leave Jackson the unicorn alone. 

Ridiculously long score review for a decision that was clear on first viewing 

33 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Bulldogs 17 frees to 7

Not unusual for the team smashing the contested possessions to win the [censored] count. Putting their head over it

Bulldogs 20 frees to 7

21 free kicks to7.

 

Seems to be completely different interpretations here depending on the jumper colour, bizarre inconsistency 

Bulldogs 21 frees to 7

Dogs going to [censored] the bed here. Swans much fitter. Swans to win by 30+

2 minutes ago, Rod Grinter Riot Squad said:

21 free kicks to7.

 

Seems to be completely different interpretations here depending on the jumper colour, bizarre inconsistency 

Same with every Bulldogs game. Been happening for years. Won them a flag 6 years ago. It’s ridiculous.

Edited March 31, 20224 yr by Glorious Day

Free kick after free kick for the Dogs

13 minutes ago, Maldonboy38 said:

Don't understand all the Tim English hate. He has been good tonight in both attack and defence. 

He is sooooo soft

2 minutes ago, loges said:

Free kick after free kick for the Dogs

Yep yep and yep