Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

The AFL website has a feature on each club’s best father-son selection since 1986 Following in his footsteps: Your club's best father-son selections

The concept has been criticized of late because of claims that it affects the integrity of the draft but there are already so many anomalies in the process and this one is so traditional in the game’s fabric that I believe it should continue. Melbourne was the first beneficiary of the rule when it recruited Ronald Dale Barassi, son of fallen war hero Ron Barassi, Senior, in 1953. The son went on to become the club’s most famous player and personality, playing in six premierships with the club and then going on to a successful coaching career. The Demons are likely to pick up Taj Woewodin (son of Shane) in this year’s draft, our first since 2014. Here’s the writer’s choice for Melbourne:- 

Jack Viney (2012)

The son of Todd is a clear standout among the Demons' father-son crop, emulating his father's feat of captaining the club and going one better on the finals front by claiming a premiership in 2021. Viney's brutal, contested style of play also mirrors that of his dad, who played 233 games for the Demons from 1987-99. Jack has just the one club champion trophy to his name, one fewer than Todd's two, but he remains every chance of ranking equally highly in the pantheon of club greats by the time his career ends. Viney's ex-teammate Billy Stretch, who managed 47 games over five seasons from 2015-19, is the best of the remaining selections. - Michael Rogers
All father-son picks: Tom Kavanagh (1988), Glenn Molloy (1992), Brad Campbell (1992), Chris Johnson (2003), Jack Viney (2012), Billy Stretch (2014)”

 

Wasn’t Ron Barassi the first father son pick?

Such a great tradition. Made much fairer when they tightened the rules to 100 games and bid matching.

I feel that the academy selections being so similar in the way they are picked up taints the public perception of the father son process.

Looking at the article, there aren't really that many father son selections who go on to be fantastic players.

Geelong are the clear standouts picking up Scarlett, Ablett jnr, Hawkins and Nathan Ablett all with 3rd round picks in a short time frame to be part of a premiership team.

 

 
3 minutes ago, BAMF said:

Such a great tradition. Made much fairer when they tightened the rules to 100 games and bid matching.

I feel that the academy selections being so similar in the way they are picked up taints the public perception of the father son process.

Looking at the article, there aren't really that many father son selections who go on to be fantastic players.

Geelong are the clear standouts picking up Scarlett, Ablett jnr, Hawkins and Nathan Ablett all with 3rd round picks in a short time frame to be part of a premiership team.

 

Nathan ablett was chosen to keep Abletts happy . The other 3 were top shelf successes and made a difference in winning flags

dustin fletcher , jobe watson , josh kennedy  but he was better after he left to Sydney,  Tom liber , john brown , steve silvagni 

some players yet proven 

 

 

I've often wondered whether clubs who have had considerable success through the father-son recruitment process, such as Geelong and Essendon, were just lucky or whether they actively helped develop the sons from a young age knowing full well that the club may be the ultimate beneficiary?

A long, long time ago I remember Melbourne making a big song and dance about putting on contract one of Ken McKaige's sons when he was still very young. (Was it Andrew, who subsequently became a TV soap actor?) But apart from that story - and I'm not even sure it was anything more than a PR stunt - I can't recall the club actively monitoring or developing sons of fathers until Chris Johnson.


Bob Johnson Jr was also a Father Son selection in the 1950's he played in 5 premierships 1955-1960 left to play in 1962 for East Fremantle in WA and won a premiership in 1965 with East Fremantle.

Later he became Captian Coach of Oakleigh in the VFA.

Michael Clark, who only played the one game, is the son of Denis. 

However,  I'm not sure he was taken as a father-son.

edit:  A quick check of Demonwiki reveals no fewer than 31 Melbourne players whose fathers also played for the mighty Demons.

Edited by Demonstone
more info

 

Joel Smith and Corey Maynard were not a father son selections because Peter and Shaun played too few games for the MFC otherwise Brayden would have been a Father Son selection.

39 minutes ago, Satan said:

Nathan ablett was chosen to keep Abletts happy . The other 3 were top shelf successes and made a difference in winning flags

dustin fletcher , jobe watson , josh kennedy  but he was better after he left to Sydney,  Tom liber , john brown , steve silvagni 

some players yet proven 

 

 

Not true. Nathan Ablett was a much better footballer pre AFL than Ablett jnr. 

He got there on merit and played well in Geelong's premiership.


Love the father son rule and the changes made using the points system has made it much fairer.

If they get rid of this rule it would be pretty disappointing as it is a unique part of our game and builds family traditions.

 

I notice from Demonwiki that Brent Croswell played 48 games for us. Was his son, Tom Kavanagh, recruited under the father-son scheme in place at the time? If so, what rules were in place about eligibility for selection? After all, if Kavanagh was eligible to play for Melbourne he must also have been eligible for Carlton and North Melbourne as well.

5 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

If so, what rules were in place about eligibility for selection?

I'm pretty sure the criterion in those days was the father playing 50 games at the club, which was later increased to 100 by the League.  Jonathon Brown was recruited as a father-son by Brisbane in 1999 despite his father Brian having played only 51 games for Fitzroy.

Under those rules, Kavanagh couldn't have been taken as a father-son by Melbourne and it would appear that neither Carlton nor North were interested in him despite him being eligible under the 50 game rule.

On 11/9/2021 at 9:05 AM, durango said:

Joel Smith and Corey Maynard were not a father son selections because Peter and Shaun played too few games for the MFC otherwise Brayden would have been a Father Son selection.

From memory both these players came onto our list as Cat B rookies, basketballers that we got because they hadn't played Footy for a few years.

 

I love the Father Son rule, nothing better than seeing a former players kid pull on the same jumper

Looking forward Woey this year and Kalani White in 4 years? Not sure whether any others on the radar. I guess the club does not want any pressure on the young sons.

  • 2 weeks later...

These are the official father-son nominations for 2021 -

Collingwood – Nick Daicos
Melbourne – Taj Woewodin
North Melbourne – Jackson Archer
Port Adelaide – Jase Burgoyne
Western Bulldogs – Sam Darcy

On 11/10/2021 at 6:59 PM, manny100 said:

Looking forward Woey this year and Kalani White in 4 years? Not sure whether any others on the radar. I guess the club does not want any pressure on the young sons.

I know there were some murmurings at the club that Jimmy’s boy Tiernan was also worth tracking.

  • Author
7 hours ago, IvanBartul13 said:

I know there were some murmurings at the club that Jimmy’s boy Tiernan was also worth tracking.

Tiernan Stynes is still a couple of years away. However, he was also regarded very highly in basketball ranks and made a state junior representative side a little while ago, 


I believe this premiership may bring all the father son children back to the Demons fold and they will have a desire to play for the Red and the Blue like before the 1970's.

I believe Nathan Brown has some boys?

Given the winding back of the Academy, it would seen that clubs should concentrate their non-list development efforts on father son/daughter development... as there's is real (defendable) benefit to be had with this program.

Maybe a geneticist, and in-house breeding program on the down low as well..?

😜 

15 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Really great to see Jack Viney taking the premiership cup to Todd.  Love Todd’s reaction. Go Dees 🏆❤️💙 

 

Ditto 🏆❤️💙🍾

 
20 minutes ago, PaulRB said:

Given the winding back of the Academy, it would seen that clubs should concentrate their non-list development efforts on father son/daughter development... as there's is real (defendable) benefit to be had with this program.

Maybe a geneticist, and in-house breeding program on the down low as well..?

😜

I agree, should be written into players contracts that the Club gets to select players partners.

Sounds like a job for JT and team.

  • Author
15 hours ago, Demonstone said:

There was also a mention of Noah Yze, but I don't know his age or anything else about him.

Noah Yze is around 15 years of age. He’s 2 - 3 years away from draft age.

Let’s not forget however, that not every child of an AFL star is necessarily the “son of a gun”.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies