Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Selwood getting done for holding the ball is maybe my favorite moment in football each week. Except for when Danger flops and doesn’t get a free. 
 

Port look good. Geelong look old. Can’t run with Port. I’m excited for when they all retire and become Hawthorn 2.0. 

Seriously, every time Selwood is anywhere near the ball, he throws his arms out and looks at his mate the umpire.

So bloody infuriating.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

FFS Port. Be better. Turning it over and costing themselves goals. 

Can’t wait for May to take on Hawkins again. Let’s hope he refrains from breaking his face this time. 

Edited by Jaded
Posted

Port’s backline and defensive efforts are a disgrace. Geelong move the ball slow. To give them so many uncontested masks inside their forward 50 is a joke. 

Posted

Blitzard was holding Dixon, not the opposite

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, monoccular said:

Blitzard was holding Dixon, not the opposite

Ruck frees make no sense. Flip a coin and pick a recipient. 

This game has turned into a steaming [censored]. Port soft and loose. Geelong slow and cheats. 

Edited by Jaded
Posted

At least we have a watchable game.

Both Dixon and Hawkins being blocked and/or held continually. 

Port are VERY good spreading with ball in hand, but equally as poor when the opposition are spreading forward. Holes everywhere. And they get annihilated one-on-one. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Port let that get away in the last bit of Q2.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Better days ahead said:

We're better than Port and better than Geelong. Our defense will strangle both no dramas

It's crazy watching every other game (even top 4 clashes) going, yeah, we've got both these teams covered no worries. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Chook said:

It's crazy watching every other game (even top 4 clashes) going, yeah, we've got both these teams covered no worries. 

I know! Followed them for decades and I can never remember feeling that way before

Posted

Defensive efforts from Port is bottom 8 stuff. They tackle hard but gees their spread is poor. They hate it when they don’t have the ball. 

Posted

Rowan and Martins laugh in and Doghouse are absolute liabilities just cannot play when heat is on cant have soft players in finals

  • Haha 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Port have good skills and could cause us some difficulties.  
 

Also that bloke Ollie Wines looks a very very good player.  I wish … you know the rest.  

So many ":what ifs" in this context - would we have got Oliver, Petracca, and last years great trio Kozzie, Jackson, Rivers, if we had called Wines' name?

 

Posted

Port are talented, but clearly like it on their terms.

Geelong are capable but are off the pace with their ageing list.

We could drop games to these two in the home & away season. No chance of doing so come finals though. We've got this!

Posted

Port pretty slack in defence - really from mid to HB.

 

Posted (edited)

Georgiades - I know it isn't the same guy, but is he related to the guy who sandwiched Jenkins with Viney??

Edited by monoccular
Posted (edited)

Rozee very selfish again in the third quarter. Took two very poor marginal shots for goal and missed when he had options to go to.

Edited by John Crow Batty

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...