Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, bobby1554 said:

We are nowhere near the Dogs, they are a class above us

 

Couldn't disagree more. 

 

About to lose top of the ladder ?. Hopefully just briefly. 

Just now, bobby1554 said:

We are nowhere near the Dogs, they are a class above us

 

No way! Dogs got lucky tonight imo. Outta these two, Port are the team to watch. They should’ve won this. 

 
13 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

[censored] Richmond- the [censored] cost me a good multi 

[censored] that they are !!!

...did you take them @theline Uncle...?

I had it the other way....Great Waste of Space +13.5

3 minutes ago, Mel Bourne said:

About to lose top of the ladder ?. Hopefully just briefly. 

Teams with a game in hand should always be ahead of teams on the same points but with no game in hand regardless of percentage imo.


7 minutes ago, bobby1554 said:

We are nowhere near the Dogs, they are a class above us

 

I guess we may know by this time Friday week.

Glad the puppies won. More games between us and 3rd. Also port are just an annoying imitation of interstate filth.

1 minute ago, dl4e said:

Glad the puppies won. More games between us and 3rd. Also port are just an annoying imitation of interstate filth.

Wannabe filth if you will

 
15 minutes ago, bobby1554 said:

We are nowhere near the Dogs, they are a class above us

 

Go to bed.

2 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Wannabe filth if you will

Haha you’re hitting a few in the middle, [censored] or not Patches. 


Dogs midfield is a class above the competition. Their backline is very suspect. Their forwardline is meh although they do have Josh “kicks goals against Melbourne specialist” Bruce. 
Port were disappointing for mine. Dogs were very good. Their midfield is next level. 
 

Edit: didn’t watch the Richmond GWS game. But given the injuries to Richmond it seems like GWS blew a good chance. Or did they choke under the pressure?

Edited by Jaded

51 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Couldn't disagree more. 

Noted. That’s what a forum is for, to share opinions.

46 minutes ago, monoccular said:

I guess we may know by this time Friday week.

Yep

 

41 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Go to bed.

Come on pal, do you honestly think we have served up better than that this year? If you do, you are in dreamland

 

2 minutes ago, bobby1554 said:

Come on pal, do you honestly think we have served up better than that this year? If you do, you are in dreamland

 

if you listened to Dazzle you'd be in dream land as well. 


The Powa are an extremely overrated team who got lucky with the shortened version of the game last year.

Couple that with the gifted games played at home and on the Gold Coast where they adapted and play very well.

No improvement whatsoever at all this year, extremely gettable in their backhalf.

32 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Dogs midfield is a class above the competition. Their backline is very suspect. Their forwardline is meh although they do have Josh “kicks goals against Melbourne specialist” Bruce. 
Port were disappointing for mine. Dogs were very good. Their midfield is next level. 
 

Edit: didn’t watch the Richmond GWS game. But given the injuries to Richmond it seems like GWS blew a good chance. Or did they choke under the pressure?

Both

9 minutes ago, Win4theAges said:

The Powa are an extremely overrated team who got lucky with the shortened version of the game last year.

Couple that with the gifted games played at home and on the Gold Coast where they adapted and play very well.

No improvement whatsoever at all this year, extremely gettable in their backhalf.

They aint no Richmond.
And we shall find out who the big dogs really are in a couple weeks.
But we gotta get over Carlton and Adelaide 1st.
Rock into the dogs game fit and undefeated.

1 hour ago, bobby1554 said:

We are nowhere near the Dogs, they are a class above us

 

I reckon they are very beatable.

Libba is the one you need to close down. As far as first dibs midfielders go, he is brilliant. On the outside the Bont and Caleb Daniel are very good also. While their midfield probably bats deeper, our back and forward lines are superior at the moment. Should be a fascinating clash in a couple of weeks time.

 

23 minutes ago, dee-tox said:

I reckon they are very beatable.

Libba is the one you need to close down. As far as first dibs midfielders go, he is brilliant. On the outside the Bont and Caleb Daniel are very good also. While their midfield probably bats deeper, our back and forward lines are superior at the moment. Should be a fascinating clash in a couple of weeks time.

 

One of the things I give the coaches credit for this season is planning for opposition, no one has really got off the leash, and we gave Martin his first proper bath. Libba is awesome, have real respect for him, and I feel we will have a plan here.


3 hours ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Dogs openly throw the ball and the umpires never call it. how much does one have to spend to get that kind of treatment from the umpires?

Button it right now big fella, or I'll have Gordon Legal send you a letter

9 hours ago, bobby1554 said:

We are nowhere near the Dogs, they are a class above us

 

Their midfield is Rolls Royce but we have them covered in every other department. Our defense and pressure game will take care of the doggies. No worries.

Edited by Better days ahead

9 hours ago, Cards13 said:

I’ve asked this before but how did the Swans give Aliir away for free?! He is a very good player. 

Salary cap squeeze i believe.

He's been a great pick-up for Port

 
9 hours ago, The Swimming Dee said:

If I had to choose I think I’d give ed his collywobbles gig back so i didn’t have to hear him comment...it is unbearable 

The quality of commentating in general is of a low standard. I listen to most games with the mute button engaged.

8 hours ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

if you listened to Dazzle you'd be in dream land as well. 

Haha save the legs Patches that right was out of the screws and hot the boundary on one bounce!


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 114 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 379 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies