Jump to content

Featured Replies

B: Jetta, May, Hibberd

HB: Lever, T.Macdonald, Salem

C: Langdon, Brayshaw, Tomlinson

HF: Fritsch, Weideman, Petracca

F: Pickett, B.Brown, Viney

R: Gawn, Oliver, Harmes

I: Jackson, Rivers, Melksham, Spargo

 

Only potential change I would make is Tomlinson out, Salem to a wing, Hunt to a half back flank or if we pick up a classy half back flanker with one of our picks they could potentially step in.

This is how I would set up:

3 tall forwards (Brown, Weideman, Jackson)

3 small forwards (Pickett, Viney, Spargo)

3 medium forwards (Fritsch, Petracca, Melksham)

3 full time inside mids (Oliver, Brayshaw, Harmes)

Petracca to split his time 50/50 between forward and midfield, Viney to split 75/25  forward midfield, Jackson to split 50/50 forward midfield (25% ruck, 25% inside mid)

Harmes to go back tagging the best mid and then getting his own pill, melksham to go back to negating the best defender and then being linkman between midfield and forwards

Jetta and Hibberd to lock down on small forwards, Salem and Rivers to rebound from half back, May Lever and Tmac can form really good defence and rebound

 

Honestly reckon if everyone is utilised in the right position we can definitely contend for top 4 and a flag next year, bring it on.

 

 

Edited by Gawndog98

 

WERRIDEE'S POST TRADE 22 AND RESERVES TEAM FOR 2021.

B: HIBBERD, MAY, LEVER

HB: RIVERS, TOMLINSON, SALEM

C : LANGDON, PETRACCA, BAKER

HF: MELKSHAM, JACKSON, FRITSCH

F: PICKETT, B.BROWN, WEIDEMAN

FOLL: GAWN, OLIVER, VINEY

IC: BRAYSHAW, HARMES, HUNT, HORE

EMERG: JONES, VANDENBERG, SPARROW, NEAL-BULLEN

 

B: LOCKHART(ROOKIE), SMITH, JETTA

HB: CHANDLER (ROOKIE), PETTY, NEITSCHKE (ROOKIE)

C : VANDENBERG, JONES, DRAFT PICK

HF: NEAL-BULLEN, MCDONALD, DRAFT PICK

F: BEDFORD, M.BROWN (ROOKIE), SPARGO

FOLL: BRADTKE (ROOKIEB), SPARROW, JORDON

IC: KOLODJASHNIJ, DARFT PICK, DRAFT PICK

9 hours ago, Gawndog98 said:

B: Jetta, May, Hibberd

HB: Lever, T.Macdonald, Salem

C: Langdon, Brayshaw, Tomlinson

HF: Fritsch, Weideman, Petracca

F: Pickett, B.Brown, Viney

R: Gawn, Oliver, Harmes

I: Jackson, Rivers, Melksham, Spargo

 

Only potential change I would make is Tomlinson out, Salem to a wing, Hunt to a half back flank or if we pick up a classy half back flanker with one of our picks they could potentially step in.

This is how I would set up:

3 tall forwards (Brown, Weideman, Jackson)

3 small forwards (Pickett, Viney, Spargo)

3 medium forwards (Fritsch, Petracca, Melksham)

3 full time inside mids (Oliver, Brayshaw, Harmes)

Petracca to split his time 50/50 between forward and midfield, Viney to split 75/25  forward midfield, Jackson to split 50/50 forward midfield (25% ruck, 25% inside mid)

Harmes to go back tagging the best mid and then getting his own pill, melksham to go back to negating the best defender and then being linkman between midfield and forwards

Jetta and Hibberd to lock down on small forwards, Salem and Rivers to rebound from half back, May Lever and Tmac can form really good defence and rebound

 

Honestly reckon if everyone is utilised in the right position we can definitely contend for top 4 and a flag next year, bring it on.

 

 

Please tell Goodwin mate

you wont get any argument on here

 
14 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

i can't see viney being used forward

he's a mid

IMO one of Oliver/Brayshaw/Harmes/Viney/Petracca will have to spend the majority of their time in another position which Brayshaw and Harmes have tried and failed at. I think Viney has some really good attributes of a small forward, he's a relentless tackler and wins a lot of 1v1s, I think he'd be great at the feet of our tails. I just think out of our mids apart from Petracca he'd have the best potential to play well in a second position, would still get some midfield time, sort of like Kane Lambert. Apart from Kozzy I think Viney would be a better small forward than any other small forwards on our list, highly doubt it happens though knowing Goody, it's just what I reckon would be best for the team. 


On 11/7/2020 at 6:50 PM, Dr.D said:

we're still bloody slow. so much for working on our deficiencies

??‍♂️Baker, hunt, Salem, rivers, Langdon, kozzie, Trac, Oliver.   What a bunch of snails 

5 minutes ago, Gawndog98 said:

IMO one of Oliver/Brayshaw/Harmes/Viney/Petracca will have to spend the majority of their time in another position which Brayshaw and Harmes have tried and failed at. I think Viney has some really good attributes of a small forward, he's a relentless tackler and wins a lot of 1v1s, I think he'd be great at the feet of our tails. I just think out of our mids apart from Petracca he'd have the best potential to play well in a second position, would still get some midfield time, sort of like Kane Lambert. Apart from Kozzy I think Viney would be a better small forward than any other small forwards on our list, highly doubt it happens though knowing Goody, it's just what I reckon would be best for the team. 

harmes is the man i reckon

prior to becoming a mid tagger midway thru 2018 he was primarily deployed as a forward / wing - i expect him to return to that role after the failed attempt to play him as a half-back distributor

Why do people put Melksham in the side ? Just does not warrant it. I would have Petty or tmac ahead of Tomlinson as well.

 
10 minutes ago, Gawndog98 said:

IMO one of Oliver/Brayshaw/Harmes/Viney/Petracca will have to spend the majority of their time in another position which Brayshaw and Harmes have tried and failed at. I think Viney has some really good attributes of a small forward, he's a relentless tackler and wins a lot of 1v1s, I think he'd be great at the feet of our tails. I just think out of our mids apart from Petracca he'd have the best potential to play well in a second position, would still get some midfield time, sort of like Kane Lambert. Apart from Kozzy I think Viney would be a better small forward than any other small forwards on our list, highly doubt it happens though knowing Goody, it's just what I reckon would be best for the team. 

Agree re Viney  Gawndog

Watched his 2020 highlights

He was far more competent than I though as you say tackled like crazy and won a lot of non centre contests just by being stronger and more determined 

Looking forward to his 2021 will be brilliant

2 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

harmes is the man i reckon

prior to becoming a mid tagger midway thru 2018 he was primarily deployed as a forward / wing - i expect him to return to that role after the failed attempt to play him as a half-back distributor

I was never a fan of Harmes as a forward, I just think Viney should be at least tried forward. When we were at our best Harmes was also one of our most important players as a negating mid, didn't do the flashy stuff but I thought his influence on games was enormous. Viney also has great influence as a mid I just think for our midfield balance and potential usefulness in a second position Viney is the man to play forward. I still maintain belief that our best midfield set up is Oliver, Brayshaw, and Harmes which provides the best balance of inside grunt (Oliver), outside nous (Brayshaw), and defence (Harmes), with then Petracca, Viney, and Jackson rotating through there.


[censored] this trade period! we've gotta put up with the Mcdonalds for another year. [censored]!!!!!!!

5 hours ago, Gawndog98 said:

IMO one of Oliver/Brayshaw/Harmes/Viney/Petracca will have to spend the majority of their time in another position which Brayshaw and Harmes have tried and failed at. I think Viney has some really good attributes of a small forward, he's a relentless tackler and wins a lot of 1v1s, I think he'd be great at the feet of our tails. I just think out of our mids apart from Petracca he'd have the best potential to play well in a second position, would still get some midfield time, sort of like Kane Lambert. Apart from Kozzy I think Viney would be a better small forward than any other small forwards on our list, highly doubt it happens though knowing Goody, it's just what I reckon would be best for the team. 

Good point on Viney.  It would greatly improve defensve forward pressure with him in the vicinity.

Seniors

FB: Lever May Hibberd

HB: Salem Petty Rivers

C: Langdon Viney Baker

HF: Fritsch Weideman Harmes

FF: Pickett BBrown Jackson

R: Gawn Oliver Petracca

IC: Brayshaw Hore Spargo Melksham

E: Sparrow MBrown Tomlinson Lockhart

 

2s

FB: Lockhart Smith Jetta

HB: Nietschke TMcDonald Chandler

C: Tomlinson vandenberg Jordon

HF: Neal-Bullen MBrown Hunt

FF: Bedford xxxx xxxx

R: Bradtke Jones Sparrow

IC: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

FB: Hibberd May Hore
HB: Rivers Lever Salem
Int: Lockhart/Tomlinson

C: Langdon Petracca Jackson
R: Gawn  Oliver Viney
Int: Harmes, Sparrow

HF: Spargo Petty Hunt
FF: Pickett Brown Fritsch
Int: ANB/draft picks 

Got to give Jackson a chance at the Blicavs wing/ruck role, with the occasional rest forward. 
 

Brown and Weid won’t work, especially with Fritsch. Petty is a better support man. 

Sparrow offers more versatility than Gus. Heavy midfield rotations and vital.

The 6th and 7th defenders (Hore, Lockhart, Tomlinson) and especially the 6/7th forwards (Hunt, ANB) might all need upgrading. A draft pick in to that forward/mid rotation is a must 

I think Weed will thrive with Brown taking the number one focus .

I love the idea of Jackson on a wing, could be a revelation.


6 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

FB: Hibberd May Hore
HB: Rivers Lever Salem
Int: Lockhart/Tomlinson

C: Langdon Petracca Jackson
R: Gawn  Oliver Viney
Int: Harmes, Sparrow

HF: Spargo Petty Hunt
FF: Pickett Brown Fritsch
Int: ANB/draft picks 

Got to give Jackson a chance at the Blicavs wing/ruck role, with the occasional rest forward. 
 

Brown and Weid won’t work, especially with Fritsch. Petty is a better support man. 

Sparrow offers more versatility than Gus. Heavy midfield rotations and vital.

The 6th and 7th defenders (Hore, Lockhart, Tomlinson) and especially the 6/7th forwards (Hunt, ANB) might all need upgrading. A draft pick in to that forward/mid rotation is a must 

I like Petty but can you please explain how he can work with Brown more effectively than Weed?

6 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

I like Petty but can you please explain how he can work with Brown more effectively than Weed?

He’s sharper at ground level with better agility. He’ll find more of the ball on the lead or in general play and be better defensively. Teams only need 1 go to tall target. Particularly with Gawn, Jackson, Fritsch and Petracca in the side we don’t need Weid’s big clunk marking or contesting. 

All line-ups seem to have a common 18-20 with just some tinkering in the last few spots, including mine:

FB: Rivers May Lever
HB: Salem Petty Hibberd
I: Smith

I like Petty better than the alternatives because he can play genuine KPD and free May and Lever up.  I'm not sold on Smith and could have Hore or Lockhart there, but if Smith can make it he's the most flexible.

C: Langdon Petracca Tomlinson
R: Gawn Oliver Viney
I: Brayshaw Harmes Melksham

I've gone back to Tomlinson on the wing, maybe Harmes, but that still wouldn't change my 22 because I think Tomlinson is ordinary but versatile.  I'm rotating midfielders through the forward line so 3 on the bench.  Melksham will raise eyebrows but he's clearly the next best player on our list by a long way.

HF: Fritsch Weideman Spargo
FF: Jackson B.Brown Pickett

I'm rotating midfielders through the forward line so I only need 6 forwards.  Spargo is there to provide some forward pressure with Pickett and Jackson.  I think his gradient is up.  Everyone knows @A F and I would play Viney as a pressure forward but it's not going to happen.

 

Edited by Pollyanna

1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said:

He’s sharper at ground level with better agility. He’ll find more of the ball on the lead or in general play and be better defensively. Teams only need 1 go to tall target. Particularly with Gawn, Jackson, Fritsch and Petracca in the side we don’t need Weid’s big clunk marking or contesting. 

FWIW, I think Weed's agility and ground play is way under-rated, he can snare a ground ball and he's strong handballer on both sides which is very rare.  I haven't seen anything from Petty to suggest he is better,

2 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

FWIW, I think Weed's agility and ground play is way under-rated, he can snare a ground ball and he's strong handballer on both sides which is very rare.  I haven't seen anything from Petty to suggest he is better,

Weid's my favourite handballer on the list, has great timing and technique on both sides. Just doesn't get enough of the ball and is terrible defensively. I suspect we'll start with Brown and Weid together, I just don't think it will work. I'd love for Weid to genuinely grab hold of his spot and not let it go.


lockhart may lever

rivers petty hibberd

hunt viney langdon

fritsch weed brayshaw

pickett Ben brown jackson

Gawn petracca Oliver

harmes tomlinson salem baker

Hibberd    May    Lever 

Salem  Tommlinson  Rivers 

Harmes  Brayshaw  Langdon 

Petracca   Weideman   Fritsch 

Pickett   Brown  Jackson 

Gawn   Viney   Oliver 

I/C: Melksham, Lochart, Baker, Jetta

Just adding my two cents - Jack tackles all day - put him in the forward line and let him loose on defenders.  Amazing contender for a midfield convert to forward. Love the idea!

 
1 hour ago, Pollyanna said:

All line-ups seem to have a common 18-20 with just some tinkering in the last few spots, including mine:

FB: Rivers May Lever
HB: Salem Petty Hibberd
I: Smith

I like Petty better than the alternatives because he can play genuine KPD and free May and Lever up.  I'm not sold on Smith and could have Hore or Lockhart there, but if Smith can make it he's the most flexible.

C: Langdon Petracca Tomlinson
R: Gawn Oliver Viney
I: Brayshaw Harmes Melksham

I've gone back to Tomlinson on the wing, maybe Harmes, but that still wouldn't change my 22 because I think Tomlinson is ordinary but versatile.  I'm rotating midfielders through the forward line so 3 on the bench.  Melksham will raise eyebrows but he's clearly the next best player on our list by a long way.

HF: Fritsch Weideman Spargo
FF: Jackson B.Brown Pickett

I'm rotating midfielders through the forward line so I only need 6 forwards.  Spargo is there to provide some forward pressure with Pickett and Jackson.  I think his gradient is up.  Everyone knows @A F and I would play Viney as a pressure forward but it's not going to happen.

 

I'd have Melksham in place of Smith and whilst I like Spargo, I worry about that forwardline without another tackler in there, but I guess there's always going to be a Harmes and/or a Petracca rotating through there too. 

24 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Hibberd    May    Lever 

Salem  Tommlinson  Rivers 

Harmes  Brayshaw  Langdon 

Petracca   Weideman   Fritsch 

Pickett   Brown  Jackson 

Gawn   Viney   Oliver 

I/C: Melksham, Lochart, Baker, Jetta

Love the starting team, mate. I'd have Melksham and Lockhart in there, but question Baker and Jetta. I really like Harmes on a wing there. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 599 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies