Jump to content

Featured Replies

B: Jetta, May, Hibberd

HB: Lever, T.Macdonald, Salem

C: Langdon, Brayshaw, Tomlinson

HF: Fritsch, Weideman, Petracca

F: Pickett, B.Brown, Viney

R: Gawn, Oliver, Harmes

I: Jackson, Rivers, Melksham, Spargo

 

Only potential change I would make is Tomlinson out, Salem to a wing, Hunt to a half back flank or if we pick up a classy half back flanker with one of our picks they could potentially step in.

This is how I would set up:

3 tall forwards (Brown, Weideman, Jackson)

3 small forwards (Pickett, Viney, Spargo)

3 medium forwards (Fritsch, Petracca, Melksham)

3 full time inside mids (Oliver, Brayshaw, Harmes)

Petracca to split his time 50/50 between forward and midfield, Viney to split 75/25  forward midfield, Jackson to split 50/50 forward midfield (25% ruck, 25% inside mid)

Harmes to go back tagging the best mid and then getting his own pill, melksham to go back to negating the best defender and then being linkman between midfield and forwards

Jetta and Hibberd to lock down on small forwards, Salem and Rivers to rebound from half back, May Lever and Tmac can form really good defence and rebound

 

Honestly reckon if everyone is utilised in the right position we can definitely contend for top 4 and a flag next year, bring it on.

 

 

Edited by Gawndog98

 

WERRIDEE'S POST TRADE 22 AND RESERVES TEAM FOR 2021.

B: HIBBERD, MAY, LEVER

HB: RIVERS, TOMLINSON, SALEM

C : LANGDON, PETRACCA, BAKER

HF: MELKSHAM, JACKSON, FRITSCH

F: PICKETT, B.BROWN, WEIDEMAN

FOLL: GAWN, OLIVER, VINEY

IC: BRAYSHAW, HARMES, HUNT, HORE

EMERG: JONES, VANDENBERG, SPARROW, NEAL-BULLEN

 

B: LOCKHART(ROOKIE), SMITH, JETTA

HB: CHANDLER (ROOKIE), PETTY, NEITSCHKE (ROOKIE)

C : VANDENBERG, JONES, DRAFT PICK

HF: NEAL-BULLEN, MCDONALD, DRAFT PICK

F: BEDFORD, M.BROWN (ROOKIE), SPARGO

FOLL: BRADTKE (ROOKIEB), SPARROW, JORDON

IC: KOLODJASHNIJ, DARFT PICK, DRAFT PICK

9 hours ago, Gawndog98 said:

B: Jetta, May, Hibberd

HB: Lever, T.Macdonald, Salem

C: Langdon, Brayshaw, Tomlinson

HF: Fritsch, Weideman, Petracca

F: Pickett, B.Brown, Viney

R: Gawn, Oliver, Harmes

I: Jackson, Rivers, Melksham, Spargo

 

Only potential change I would make is Tomlinson out, Salem to a wing, Hunt to a half back flank or if we pick up a classy half back flanker with one of our picks they could potentially step in.

This is how I would set up:

3 tall forwards (Brown, Weideman, Jackson)

3 small forwards (Pickett, Viney, Spargo)

3 medium forwards (Fritsch, Petracca, Melksham)

3 full time inside mids (Oliver, Brayshaw, Harmes)

Petracca to split his time 50/50 between forward and midfield, Viney to split 75/25  forward midfield, Jackson to split 50/50 forward midfield (25% ruck, 25% inside mid)

Harmes to go back tagging the best mid and then getting his own pill, melksham to go back to negating the best defender and then being linkman between midfield and forwards

Jetta and Hibberd to lock down on small forwards, Salem and Rivers to rebound from half back, May Lever and Tmac can form really good defence and rebound

 

Honestly reckon if everyone is utilised in the right position we can definitely contend for top 4 and a flag next year, bring it on.

 

 

Please tell Goodwin mate

you wont get any argument on here

 
14 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

i can't see viney being used forward

he's a mid

IMO one of Oliver/Brayshaw/Harmes/Viney/Petracca will have to spend the majority of their time in another position which Brayshaw and Harmes have tried and failed at. I think Viney has some really good attributes of a small forward, he's a relentless tackler and wins a lot of 1v1s, I think he'd be great at the feet of our tails. I just think out of our mids apart from Petracca he'd have the best potential to play well in a second position, would still get some midfield time, sort of like Kane Lambert. Apart from Kozzy I think Viney would be a better small forward than any other small forwards on our list, highly doubt it happens though knowing Goody, it's just what I reckon would be best for the team. 


On 11/7/2020 at 6:50 PM, Dr.D said:

we're still bloody slow. so much for working on our deficiencies

??‍♂️Baker, hunt, Salem, rivers, Langdon, kozzie, Trac, Oliver.   What a bunch of snails 

5 minutes ago, Gawndog98 said:

IMO one of Oliver/Brayshaw/Harmes/Viney/Petracca will have to spend the majority of their time in another position which Brayshaw and Harmes have tried and failed at. I think Viney has some really good attributes of a small forward, he's a relentless tackler and wins a lot of 1v1s, I think he'd be great at the feet of our tails. I just think out of our mids apart from Petracca he'd have the best potential to play well in a second position, would still get some midfield time, sort of like Kane Lambert. Apart from Kozzy I think Viney would be a better small forward than any other small forwards on our list, highly doubt it happens though knowing Goody, it's just what I reckon would be best for the team. 

harmes is the man i reckon

prior to becoming a mid tagger midway thru 2018 he was primarily deployed as a forward / wing - i expect him to return to that role after the failed attempt to play him as a half-back distributor

Why do people put Melksham in the side ? Just does not warrant it. I would have Petty or tmac ahead of Tomlinson as well.

 
10 minutes ago, Gawndog98 said:

IMO one of Oliver/Brayshaw/Harmes/Viney/Petracca will have to spend the majority of their time in another position which Brayshaw and Harmes have tried and failed at. I think Viney has some really good attributes of a small forward, he's a relentless tackler and wins a lot of 1v1s, I think he'd be great at the feet of our tails. I just think out of our mids apart from Petracca he'd have the best potential to play well in a second position, would still get some midfield time, sort of like Kane Lambert. Apart from Kozzy I think Viney would be a better small forward than any other small forwards on our list, highly doubt it happens though knowing Goody, it's just what I reckon would be best for the team. 

Agree re Viney  Gawndog

Watched his 2020 highlights

He was far more competent than I though as you say tackled like crazy and won a lot of non centre contests just by being stronger and more determined 

Looking forward to his 2021 will be brilliant

2 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

harmes is the man i reckon

prior to becoming a mid tagger midway thru 2018 he was primarily deployed as a forward / wing - i expect him to return to that role after the failed attempt to play him as a half-back distributor

I was never a fan of Harmes as a forward, I just think Viney should be at least tried forward. When we were at our best Harmes was also one of our most important players as a negating mid, didn't do the flashy stuff but I thought his influence on games was enormous. Viney also has great influence as a mid I just think for our midfield balance and potential usefulness in a second position Viney is the man to play forward. I still maintain belief that our best midfield set up is Oliver, Brayshaw, and Harmes which provides the best balance of inside grunt (Oliver), outside nous (Brayshaw), and defence (Harmes), with then Petracca, Viney, and Jackson rotating through there.


[censored] this trade period! we've gotta put up with the Mcdonalds for another year. [censored]!!!!!!!

5 hours ago, Gawndog98 said:

IMO one of Oliver/Brayshaw/Harmes/Viney/Petracca will have to spend the majority of their time in another position which Brayshaw and Harmes have tried and failed at. I think Viney has some really good attributes of a small forward, he's a relentless tackler and wins a lot of 1v1s, I think he'd be great at the feet of our tails. I just think out of our mids apart from Petracca he'd have the best potential to play well in a second position, would still get some midfield time, sort of like Kane Lambert. Apart from Kozzy I think Viney would be a better small forward than any other small forwards on our list, highly doubt it happens though knowing Goody, it's just what I reckon would be best for the team. 

Good point on Viney.  It would greatly improve defensve forward pressure with him in the vicinity.

Seniors

FB: Lever May Hibberd

HB: Salem Petty Rivers

C: Langdon Viney Baker

HF: Fritsch Weideman Harmes

FF: Pickett BBrown Jackson

R: Gawn Oliver Petracca

IC: Brayshaw Hore Spargo Melksham

E: Sparrow MBrown Tomlinson Lockhart

 

2s

FB: Lockhart Smith Jetta

HB: Nietschke TMcDonald Chandler

C: Tomlinson vandenberg Jordon

HF: Neal-Bullen MBrown Hunt

FF: Bedford xxxx xxxx

R: Bradtke Jones Sparrow

IC: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx

FB: Hibberd May Hore
HB: Rivers Lever Salem
Int: Lockhart/Tomlinson

C: Langdon Petracca Jackson
R: Gawn  Oliver Viney
Int: Harmes, Sparrow

HF: Spargo Petty Hunt
FF: Pickett Brown Fritsch
Int: ANB/draft picks 

Got to give Jackson a chance at the Blicavs wing/ruck role, with the occasional rest forward. 
 

Brown and Weid won’t work, especially with Fritsch. Petty is a better support man. 

Sparrow offers more versatility than Gus. Heavy midfield rotations and vital.

The 6th and 7th defenders (Hore, Lockhart, Tomlinson) and especially the 6/7th forwards (Hunt, ANB) might all need upgrading. A draft pick in to that forward/mid rotation is a must 

I think Weed will thrive with Brown taking the number one focus .

I love the idea of Jackson on a wing, could be a revelation.


6 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

FB: Hibberd May Hore
HB: Rivers Lever Salem
Int: Lockhart/Tomlinson

C: Langdon Petracca Jackson
R: Gawn  Oliver Viney
Int: Harmes, Sparrow

HF: Spargo Petty Hunt
FF: Pickett Brown Fritsch
Int: ANB/draft picks 

Got to give Jackson a chance at the Blicavs wing/ruck role, with the occasional rest forward. 
 

Brown and Weid won’t work, especially with Fritsch. Petty is a better support man. 

Sparrow offers more versatility than Gus. Heavy midfield rotations and vital.

The 6th and 7th defenders (Hore, Lockhart, Tomlinson) and especially the 6/7th forwards (Hunt, ANB) might all need upgrading. A draft pick in to that forward/mid rotation is a must 

I like Petty but can you please explain how he can work with Brown more effectively than Weed?

6 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

I like Petty but can you please explain how he can work with Brown more effectively than Weed?

He’s sharper at ground level with better agility. He’ll find more of the ball on the lead or in general play and be better defensively. Teams only need 1 go to tall target. Particularly with Gawn, Jackson, Fritsch and Petracca in the side we don’t need Weid’s big clunk marking or contesting. 

All line-ups seem to have a common 18-20 with just some tinkering in the last few spots, including mine:

FB: Rivers May Lever
HB: Salem Petty Hibberd
I: Smith

I like Petty better than the alternatives because he can play genuine KPD and free May and Lever up.  I'm not sold on Smith and could have Hore or Lockhart there, but if Smith can make it he's the most flexible.

C: Langdon Petracca Tomlinson
R: Gawn Oliver Viney
I: Brayshaw Harmes Melksham

I've gone back to Tomlinson on the wing, maybe Harmes, but that still wouldn't change my 22 because I think Tomlinson is ordinary but versatile.  I'm rotating midfielders through the forward line so 3 on the bench.  Melksham will raise eyebrows but he's clearly the next best player on our list by a long way.

HF: Fritsch Weideman Spargo
FF: Jackson B.Brown Pickett

I'm rotating midfielders through the forward line so I only need 6 forwards.  Spargo is there to provide some forward pressure with Pickett and Jackson.  I think his gradient is up.  Everyone knows @A F and I would play Viney as a pressure forward but it's not going to happen.

 

Edited by Pollyanna

1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said:

He’s sharper at ground level with better agility. He’ll find more of the ball on the lead or in general play and be better defensively. Teams only need 1 go to tall target. Particularly with Gawn, Jackson, Fritsch and Petracca in the side we don’t need Weid’s big clunk marking or contesting. 

FWIW, I think Weed's agility and ground play is way under-rated, he can snare a ground ball and he's strong handballer on both sides which is very rare.  I haven't seen anything from Petty to suggest he is better,

2 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

FWIW, I think Weed's agility and ground play is way under-rated, he can snare a ground ball and he's strong handballer on both sides which is very rare.  I haven't seen anything from Petty to suggest he is better,

Weid's my favourite handballer on the list, has great timing and technique on both sides. Just doesn't get enough of the ball and is terrible defensively. I suspect we'll start with Brown and Weid together, I just don't think it will work. I'd love for Weid to genuinely grab hold of his spot and not let it go.


lockhart may lever

rivers petty hibberd

hunt viney langdon

fritsch weed brayshaw

pickett Ben brown jackson

Gawn petracca Oliver

harmes tomlinson salem baker

Hibberd    May    Lever 

Salem  Tommlinson  Rivers 

Harmes  Brayshaw  Langdon 

Petracca   Weideman   Fritsch 

Pickett   Brown  Jackson 

Gawn   Viney   Oliver 

I/C: Melksham, Lochart, Baker, Jetta

Just adding my two cents - Jack tackles all day - put him in the forward line and let him loose on defenders.  Amazing contender for a midfield convert to forward. Love the idea!

 
1 hour ago, Pollyanna said:

All line-ups seem to have a common 18-20 with just some tinkering in the last few spots, including mine:

FB: Rivers May Lever
HB: Salem Petty Hibberd
I: Smith

I like Petty better than the alternatives because he can play genuine KPD and free May and Lever up.  I'm not sold on Smith and could have Hore or Lockhart there, but if Smith can make it he's the most flexible.

C: Langdon Petracca Tomlinson
R: Gawn Oliver Viney
I: Brayshaw Harmes Melksham

I've gone back to Tomlinson on the wing, maybe Harmes, but that still wouldn't change my 22 because I think Tomlinson is ordinary but versatile.  I'm rotating midfielders through the forward line so 3 on the bench.  Melksham will raise eyebrows but he's clearly the next best player on our list by a long way.

HF: Fritsch Weideman Spargo
FF: Jackson B.Brown Pickett

I'm rotating midfielders through the forward line so I only need 6 forwards.  Spargo is there to provide some forward pressure with Pickett and Jackson.  I think his gradient is up.  Everyone knows @A F and I would play Viney as a pressure forward but it's not going to happen.

 

I'd have Melksham in place of Smith and whilst I like Spargo, I worry about that forwardline without another tackler in there, but I guess there's always going to be a Harmes and/or a Petracca rotating through there too. 

24 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

Hibberd    May    Lever 

Salem  Tommlinson  Rivers 

Harmes  Brayshaw  Langdon 

Petracca   Weideman   Fritsch 

Pickett   Brown  Jackson 

Gawn   Viney   Oliver 

I/C: Melksham, Lochart, Baker, Jetta

Love the starting team, mate. I'd have Melksham and Lockhart in there, but question Baker and Jetta. I really like Harmes on a wing there. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 83 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 169 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Like
    • 532 replies