Jump to content

Featured Replies

9 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

More like a consistently great team that finally put it together in the finals. 

What ?  

That's what makes great teams great, i.e. consistently putting it together in finals. 

It's the very essence of a great team, which is where they've failed spectacularly.

Clearly, we won't agree.

 
10 minutes ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

What ?  

That's what makes great teams great, i.e. consistently putting it together in finals. 

It's the very essence of a great team, which is where they've failed spectacularly.

Clearly, we won't agree.

If the Cats win tonight, they will be known as a great side. All premierships sides are. Even the ones that bob up and win out of nowhere (which Geelong clearly won't be). 

 

 

1 minute ago, Fat Tony said:

If the Cats win tonight, they will be known as a great side. All premierships sides are. Even the ones that bob up and win out of nowhere (which Geelong clearly won't be). 

 

 

The Bulldogs aren't known as a great side.  They had a great year.

As I said, clearly we disagree.  And there's no point having a backwards and forwards tennis match.  I'll leave you to your opinion.

 

Season has suited teams with a lot of very experienced players.

3 hours ago, Fat Tony said:

It amazes me that people don’t rate Geelong. 
The Cats finished 2018 in eighth but with the second highest percentage and then came up against a side that was white hot in the finals. 
They then won the minor premiership in 2019 and blew a half time lead in the preliminary final against the Tigers. 
This year they are in the GF. 
And they nearly always beat us. 

I wish Melbourne could reach Geelong's level of overratedness.


Geelong has won 10+ games every year since 2003.

They've only missed the finals twice in that period (2006 with 10.5 wins, and 2015 with 11.5 wins).

They've won three flags in the last 14 seasons, could be four tonight.

And they've made the preliminary final weekend 10 times in the last 14 seasons.

All of that to me represents very strong performance.

Yes, they've struggled in finals since the 2011 flag (a 6-12 record heading into tonight), and if they lose tonight they'll have won zero flags in the last nine seasons despite finishing in the top 4 six times. IMO, all that says to me is that they were a mark or two below becoming possibly the greatest team in the history of the game over a 14-season stretch.

20 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

Geelong has won 10+ games every year since 2003.

They've only missed the finals twice in that period (2006 with 10.5 wins, and 2015 with 11.5 wins).

They've won three flags in the last 14 seasons, could be four tonight.

And they've made the preliminary final weekend 10 times in the last 14 seasons.

All of that to me represents very strong performance.

Yes, they've struggled in finals since the 2011 flag (a 6-12 record heading into tonight), and if they lose tonight they'll have won zero flags in the last nine seasons despite finishing in the top 4 six times. IMO, all that says to me is that they were a mark or two below becoming possibly the greatest team in the history of the game over a 14-season stretch.

You're conflating eras.

Not a great current team, irrespective of whether they win tonight, or not.

However, they are a great great club, which is a different issue.  

On 10/23/2020 at 12:55 PM, Whispering_Jack said:

Geelong recruiting guru Stephen Wells has been around for a long time and is one of the most respected of the AFL’s recruiting fraternity. 

This is a great story for those wondering how Geelong has managed to stay among the leading pack of AFL clubs year after year. It’s about a period of 39 days in October/November 2016 when Wells was busy wheeling and dealing his way to securing the players who are now one win away from delivering his club a premiership. 

The Architects: How Geelong tapped into a junior footy team to build a premiership-contending list

And of course, he’s already secured one of the prize recruits of this year’s trade, free agency and draft period in GWS Giant forward Jeremy Cameron plus probably Higgins from North.

Plus 3 picks in the 1st Round of the draft!! Amazing!

 
1 hour ago, titan_uranus said:

Geelong has won 10+ games every year since 2003.

They've only missed the finals twice in that period (2006 with 10.5 wins, and 2015 with 11.5 wins).

They've won three flags in the last 14 seasons, could be four tonight.

And they've made the preliminary final weekend 10 times in the last 14 seasons.

All of that to me represents very strong performance.

Yes, they've struggled in finals since the 2011 flag (a 6-12 record heading into tonight), and if they lose tonight they'll have won zero flags in the last nine seasons despite finishing in the top 4 six times. IMO, all that says to me is that they were a mark or two below becoming possibly the greatest team in the history of the game over a 14-season stretch.

Ease up tiger, we won 6 flags and played in 8 GFs in an 11 year stretch in finals - they are MILES off that.  You can add a 3 dud seasons on either end to make it up to 14 and we still smash them

Edited by Pollyanna

5 hours ago, Clintosaurus said:

Season has suited teams with a lot of very experienced players.

This.

Was interesting in the thread when someone highlighted that they’ve had only 5 changes to the team we beat in the 2018 finals. I think that says a lot about the value of consistency. It’s much easier to have one player step in to a very organised and experience group than 3-4 players most weeks stepping into a team still trying to get the balance right.


People are to in love with Geelong, I hope they bring in Huggins, which pushs out a young gun like Jordan Clark out, I can see a Australian cricket side thing happening, where 6 to 8 players all retire all at once, and the young guns not getting a game  will either be traded or play so long at the lower level they lose confidence in themselves and don't take the next step.

1 hour ago, Hannibal Inc. said:

You're conflating eras.

Not a great current team, irrespective of whether they win tonight, or not.

However, they are a great great club, which is a different issue.  

Yes I agree. 

39 minutes ago, Pollyanna said:

Ease up tiger, we won 6 flags and played in 8 GFs in an 11 year stretch in finals - they are MILES off that.  You can add a 3 dud seasons on either end to make it up to 14 and we still smash them

Fair.

They're doing it in a 16-18 team era where the league is striving for equalisation at every turn, though.

Geelong have onfield coaches on every line. Taylor, Danger, Ablett, Selwood, Hawkins. Be a huge benefit.

On 10/24/2020 at 1:38 PM, Better days ahead said:

I wish Melbourne could reach Geelong's level of overratedness.

Me too! 

21 hours ago, don't make me angry said:

People are to in love with Geelong, I hope they bring in Huggins, which pushs out a young gun like Jordan Clark out, I can see a Australian cricket side thing happening, where 6 to 8 players all retire all at once, and the young guns not getting a game  will either be traded or play so long at the lower level they lose confidence in themselves and don't take the next step.

I thought that in 2018 and guess who made the GF and who finished 9th? 


Off field, Geelong benefits greatly by the fact that it's located within an important marginal electorate. It's my understanding that no other club Victorian club receives government funded upgrades to the extent that Geelong does - from both sides of politics, State and Federal. 

Just one of the little things that helps a club

23 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

Geelong has won 10+ games every year since 2003.

They've only missed the finals twice in that period (2006 with 10.5 wins, and 2015 with 11.5 wins).

They've won three flags in the last 14 seasons, could be four tonight.

And they've made the preliminary final weekend 10 times in the last 14 seasons.

All of that to me represents very strong performance.

Yes, they've struggled in finals since the 2011 flag (a 6-12 record heading into tonight), and if they lose tonight they'll have won zero flags in the last nine seasons despite finishing in the top 4 six times. IMO, all that says to me is that they were a mark or two below becoming possibly the greatest team in the history of the game over a 14-season stretch.

We should have so bad over those 14 seasons.

3 minutes ago, Return to Glory said:

Off field, Geelong benefits greatly by the fact that it's located within an important marginal electorate. It's my understanding that no other club Victorian club receives government funded upgrades to the extent that Geelong does - from both sides of politics, State and Federal. 

Just one of the little things that helps a club

They still have to go out and win.

Just now, old dee said:

They still have to go out and win.

Not disputing that Old Dee. But if you're selling the club as a destination, and can showcase a whole lot of added extras, it's going to help. The money thrown at Geelong is pretty substantial and that flows to club sponsorship, facilities etc

3 minutes ago, Return to Glory said:

Not disputing that Old Dee. But if you're selling the club as a destination, and can showcase a whole lot of added extras, it's going to help. The money thrown at Geelong is pretty substantial and that flows to club sponsorship, facilities etc

Having plenty of money seldom hurts.


21 hours ago, Clintosaurus said:

Geelong have onfield coaches on every line. Taylor, Danger, Ablett, Selwood, Hawkins. Be a huge benefit.

And people wonder why we look to bring in players like Smith, Lewis etc

I did pump up Geelong's tyres earlier, but the clear knock on them under Scott strengthened last night.

In the 2017-2020 period, Geelong has played 11 finals for a 4-7 record.

Richmond, in the same period, has played 12 finals for a 10-2 record (and three flags, obviously). In each of Richmond's premiership winning seasons, they've beaten Geelong (2017 QF, 2019 PF, 2020 GF).

Things could have looked so different to the Richmond "dynasty" and Geelong's Dangerwood era if even one of those three Richmond-Geelong finals went the other way.

2 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

I did pump up Geelong's tyres earlier, but the clear knock on them under Scott strengthened last night.

In the 2017-2020 period, Geelong has played 11 finals for a 4-7 record.

Richmond, in the same period, has played 12 finals for a 10-2 record (and three flags, obviously). In each of Richmond's premiership winning seasons, they've beaten Geelong (2017 QF, 2019 PF, 2020 GF).

Things could have looked so different to the Richmond "dynasty" and Geelong's Dangerwood era if even one of those three Richmond-Geelong finals went the other way.

Correct, but they didn’t. 
Jeelong’s Finals record since 2011 has been very consistent but ultimately very ordinary. 
The amount of Government assistance they recieve compared to other Victorian sides is Horrendous, and it is about time Clubs like The MFC stood up and said so. 
Maybe this is one of the reasons Pert is so forthright about being financially independent. It is the only way we can change things around 

It will be an interesting period of time over Summer. How close did we get to raising $1 Million...?

  • 3 weeks later...
 

Are Geelong leading the field with there new trading strategy? It has never been done before, it could be as smart as north Melbourne where in the 70's with the new 10 year rule, will other clubs head down the Geelong path, it could be a stroke of genius.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 183 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies